> If a goal is to remove the unspoken marketing incentives for a project to join the Sandbox, what value does the Sandbox provide that a Working Group with a small initiative seeking a neutral home

I’m concerned that we may overcorrecting in this proposal, resulting in little value ascribed to the Sandbox project tier, detracting from the work projects have put in to reach Sandbox. If a goal

Sorry for the late notice, but after a late-breaking conflict has come up and I'm going to have to miss today's meeting Liz

A focus on healthy governance is an important consideration as we look across the project levels. Seeding small portions of governance requirements upfront positions the project for future success. In

Hi all, We'll be meeting tomorrow, this is a TOC + SIG Chair meeting. Agenda: Sandbox Proposal Review * Existing branding * Process for current sandbox proposals * Public comment period Projects

We did a sig-security security assessment of SPIFFE/SPIRE, and the project has done a very good job with the security evaluation and risk analysis of its components. More details of the assessment:

+1. People have other jobs and vacations too. I don't see the need to rush this.

Hi Chris, Not all DD reviews and discussions are open and public. The communications are happening in the private channels, this has been confirmed by the TOC in the meetings. I believe this

Strong agree with alexis - I’m booked solid these days and unless something is on fire it usually gets bumped down the list. I usually book at a minimum one week out from initial engagement and I

Feel free to go ahead and edit. I created a clone of it before I sent it out to the internet for comment, just in case someone wanted to troll. Edit away! --brendan

Greetings all, The Brigade 2020 Annual Review PR has been posted at https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/449 per Sandbox project processes. Thank you in advance for your time and energy! Cheers, Vaughn

How do you want feedback? email here or edit the form? scary that it appears i can edit :-) thanks -Doug _______________________________________________________ STSM | IBM Hybrid Cloud | OM

Busy people just don't pay attention to Github notifications until it really matters? <caniszczyk@...> wrote:

Maybe the weeks feel extra long these days but it seems just an extra unnecessary amount of time. All the work and review happens in the open so it's not like people will be surprised. -- Chris

I see no reason to move to one week if the meetings are two weeks apart. This is like an auction "asking once, asking twice..."

Brendan, As someone who has a sandbox project to submit, this looks good to me. The form does need some cleanup (like a thing listed as optional is marked as required). Otherwise, this looks doable. -

This sparked a few thoughts I figured I would share... 1. If someone goes on vacation for a week they could miss a public comment period in its entirety. As someone who went through the 2 week period

Many apologies for the delay in getting this together. Here is the first draft of the sandbox

Chris is suggesting reducingthe comment period after a vote is called from two weeks to one week. I can see the attraction,because in practice if people are going to comment it seems they’re

I like the ideal to revamp the process. Being on both sides of the process I had to learn that it is far from ideal. I would suggest to add a section which projects should join the CNCF, what they