|
|
Re: Migrating the CNCF calendar from PT to UTC?
+1, also from UTC it easier to calculate the time to local time (for people outside the US)
|
+1, also from UTC it easier to calculate the time to local time (for people outside the US)
|
By
Omer Kahani
·
#4520
·
|
|
Re: Migrating the CNCF calendar from PT to UTC?
+1
Kind regards,
Tom Kerkhove
Microsoft Azure MVP & Advisor – AZUG Crew Member - Azure Architect at Codit
Blog - blog.tomkerkhove.be
Twitter - @TomKerkhove
Op vr 10 apr. 2020 om 11:54 schreef
|
+1
Kind regards,
Tom Kerkhove
Microsoft Azure MVP & Advisor – AZUG Crew Member - Azure Architect at Codit
Blog - blog.tomkerkhove.be
Twitter - @TomKerkhove
Op vr 10 apr. 2020 om 11:54 schreef
|
By
Tom Kerkhove
·
#4519
·
|
|
Migrating the CNCF calendar from PT to UTC?
Dear all,
I am aware that this is not the best mailing list for this discussion,
but I am not aware of a better one. Please feel free to redirect me,
and this discussion.
Currently the "CNCF Public
|
Dear all,
I am aware that this is not the best mailing list for this discussion,
but I am not aware of a better one. Please feel free to redirect me,
and this discussion.
Currently the "CNCF Public
|
By
Richard Hartmann
·
#4518
·
|
|
[RESULT] Dragonfly Approved
Dragonfly has requested to move to the incubation maturity level:
https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/276
Binding: 8/10 *note: Quorum is 10 as Jeff Brewer has been away*
Sheng Liang:
|
Dragonfly has requested to move to the incubation maturity level:
https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/276
Binding: 8/10 *note: Quorum is 10 as Jeff Brewer has been away*
Sheng Liang:
|
By
Amye Scavarda Perrin
·
#4517
·
|
|
[RESULT] Argo Approved
The Argo project is being proposed as an incubation level CNCF
project: https://github.com/argoproj/argo
Binding: 8/10 *note: Quorum is 10 as Jeff Brewer has been away*
Michelle Noorali:
|
The Argo project is being proposed as an incubation level CNCF
project: https://github.com/argoproj/argo
Binding: 8/10 *note: Quorum is 10 as Jeff Brewer has been away*
Michelle Noorali:
|
By
Amye Scavarda Perrin
·
#4516
·
|
|
Re: [RESULT] SIG Observability Approved
\o/
By
Matt Young
·
#4515
·
|
|
Agenda for 4/7 TOC Meeting
Hi all,
We'll be meeting tomorrow at 8am Pacific.
Agenda:
SIG Updates:- SIG-App Delivery
- SIG Contributor Strategy
- SIG-Network
- SIG-Runtime
- SIG-Security
- SIG-Storage
- SIG Observability
|
Hi all,
We'll be meeting tomorrow at 8am Pacific.
Agenda:
SIG Updates:- SIG-App Delivery
- SIG Contributor Strategy
- SIG-Network
- SIG-Runtime
- SIG-Security
- SIG-Storage
- SIG Observability
|
By
Amye Scavarda Perrin
·
#4514
·
|
|
Re: [RESULT] SIG Observability Approved
Yay!
<ascavarda@...> wrote:
|
Yay!
<ascavarda@...> wrote:
|
By
Richard Hartmann
·
#4513
·
|
|
Re: [RESULT] SIG Observability Approved
Applause!
By
alexis richardson
·
#4512
·
|
|
[RESULT] SIG Observability Approved
Brendan Burns has called for a vote on SIG Observability: https://github.com/cncf/sig-observability/pull/1
Welcome new SIG!
+1 Binding: 8/10
Brendan Burns:
|
Brendan Burns has called for a vote on SIG Observability: https://github.com/cncf/sig-observability/pull/1
Welcome new SIG!
+1 Binding: 8/10
Brendan Burns:
|
By
Amye Scavarda Perrin
·
#4511
·
|
|
Re: [Vote] Argo Project Proposal
+1 non-binding
By
ryota.sawada@...
·
#4510
·
|
|
Re: Vote on SIG-Observability Charter
+1, non-binding
By
Paul Buck
·
#4509
·
|
|
Re: Vote on SIG-Observability Charter
+1 nb
-- Randy AbernethyManaging PartnerRX-M, LLCrandy.abernethy@...
|
+1 nb
-- Randy AbernethyManaging PartnerRX-M, LLCrandy.abernethy@...
|
By
Randy Abernethy
·
#4508
·
|
|
Re: Vote on SIG-Observability Charter
Dear all,
+1, non binding.
Thank you,
Tina ^ ^
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient,
|
Dear all,
+1, non binding.
Thank you,
Tina ^ ^
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient,
|
By
Tina Tsou
·
#4507
·
|
|
Re: Vote on SIG-Observability Charter
+1 binding
By
Michelle Noorali <michelle.noorali@...>
·
#4506
·
|
|
Re: Vote on SIG-Observability Charter
+1 NB
By
Naren Narendra <narendra@...>
·
#4505
·
|
|
Re: Vote on SIG-Observability Charter
+1 nb
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Fahad Arshad <fahad.arshad@...>
Date: Friday, April 3, 2020 at 5:13 AM
To: <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: Re: [cncf-toc] Vote on SIG-Observability Charter
+1,
|
+1 nb
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Fahad Arshad <fahad.arshad@...>
Date: Friday, April 3, 2020 at 5:13 AM
To: <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: Re: [cncf-toc] Vote on SIG-Observability Charter
+1,
|
By
Jon Mittelhauser
·
#4504
·
|
|
Re: Vote on SIG-Observability Charter
+1, nb
Fahad Arshad
By
Fahad Arshad
·
#4503
·
|
|
Re: [cncf-gb] GB-TOC joint meeting
+1 thanks Eduardo
Quinton
I understand and I think agree with the principles, but I don't think the details are clear. Let me list some examples.
1) Nats has non-Synadia maintainers & core
|
+1 thanks Eduardo
Quinton
I understand and I think agree with the principles, but I don't think the details are clear. Let me list some examples.
1) Nats has non-Synadia maintainers & core
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#4502
·
|
|
Re: [cncf-gb] GB-TOC joint meeting
...about NATS towards graduation:
Maintenance of a project is critical, we all agree on that. Now I think is important to consider in the equation "which other companies contribute to the project"; I
|
...about NATS towards graduation:
Maintenance of a project is critical, we all agree on that. Now I think is important to consider in the equation "which other companies contribute to the project"; I
|
By
Eduardo Silva
·
#4501
·
|
