|
Agenda for 4/7 TOC Meeting
Hi all,
We'll be meeting tomorrow at 8am Pacific.
Agenda:
SIG Updates:- SIG-App Delivery
- SIG Contributor Strategy
- SIG-Network
- SIG-Runtime
- SIG-Security
- SIG-Storage
- SIG Observability
Hi all,
We'll be meeting tomorrow at 8am Pacific.
Agenda:
SIG Updates:- SIG-App Delivery
- SIG Contributor Strategy
- SIG-Network
- SIG-Runtime
- SIG-Security
- SIG-Storage
- SIG Observability
|
By
Amye Scavarda Perrin
·
#4514
·
|
|
Re: [RESULT] SIG Observability Approved
Yay!
<ascavarda@...> wrote:
Yay!
<ascavarda@...> wrote:
|
By
Richard Hartmann
·
#4513
·
|
|
Re: [RESULT] SIG Observability Approved
Applause!
By
alexis richardson
·
#4512
·
|
|
[RESULT] SIG Observability Approved
Brendan Burns has called for a vote on SIG Observability: https://github.com/cncf/sig-observability/pull/1
Welcome new SIG!
+1 Binding: 8/10
Brendan Burns:
Brendan Burns has called for a vote on SIG Observability: https://github.com/cncf/sig-observability/pull/1
Welcome new SIG!
+1 Binding: 8/10
Brendan Burns:
|
By
Amye Scavarda Perrin
·
#4511
·
|
|
Re: [Vote] Argo Project Proposal
+1 non-binding
By
ryota.sawada@...
·
#4510
·
|
|
Re: Vote on SIG-Observability Charter
+1, non-binding
By
Paul Buck
·
#4509
·
|
|
Re: Vote on SIG-Observability Charter
+1 nb
-- Randy AbernethyManaging PartnerRX-M, LLCrandy.abernethy@...
+1 nb
-- Randy AbernethyManaging PartnerRX-M, LLCrandy.abernethy@...
|
By
Randy Abernethy
·
#4508
·
|
|
Re: Vote on SIG-Observability Charter
Dear all,
+1, non binding.
Thank you,
Tina ^ ^
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient,
Dear all,
+1, non binding.
Thank you,
Tina ^ ^
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient,
|
By
Tina Tsou
·
#4507
·
|
|
Re: Vote on SIG-Observability Charter
+1 binding
By
Michelle Noorali <michelle.noorali@...>
·
#4506
·
|
|
Re: Vote on SIG-Observability Charter
+1 NB
By
Naren Narendra <narendra@...>
·
#4505
·
|
|
Re: Vote on SIG-Observability Charter
+1 nb
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Fahad Arshad <fahad.arshad@...>
Date: Friday, April 3, 2020 at 5:13 AM
To: <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: Re: [cncf-toc] Vote on SIG-Observability Charter
+1,
+1 nb
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Fahad Arshad <fahad.arshad@...>
Date: Friday, April 3, 2020 at 5:13 AM
To: <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: Re: [cncf-toc] Vote on SIG-Observability Charter
+1,
|
By
Jon Mittelhauser
·
#4504
·
|
|
Re: Vote on SIG-Observability Charter
+1, nb
Fahad Arshad
By
Fahad Arshad
·
#4503
·
|
|
Re: [cncf-gb] GB-TOC joint meeting
+1 thanks Eduardo
Quinton
I understand and I think agree with the principles, but I don't think the details are clear. Let me list some examples.
1) Nats has non-Synadia maintainers & core
+1 thanks Eduardo
Quinton
I understand and I think agree with the principles, but I don't think the details are clear. Let me list some examples.
1) Nats has non-Synadia maintainers & core
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#4502
·
|
|
Re: [cncf-gb] GB-TOC joint meeting
...about NATS towards graduation:
Maintenance of a project is critical, we all agree on that. Now I think is important to consider in the equation "which other companies contribute to the project"; I
...about NATS towards graduation:
Maintenance of a project is critical, we all agree on that. Now I think is important to consider in the equation "which other companies contribute to the project"; I
|
By
Eduardo Silva
·
#4501
·
|
|
Re: [cncf-gb] GB-TOC joint meeting
Regarding requiring multiple maintainer organizations for graduated projects, specifically:
Alexis: "Let's make sure that we are super clear on *what and why* we want from
multiple maintainers at
Regarding requiring multiple maintainer organizations for graduated projects, specifically:
Alexis: "Let's make sure that we are super clear on *what and why* we want from
multiple maintainers at
|
By
Quinton Hoole <quinton@...>
·
#4500
·
|
|
Re: [Vote] Argo Project Proposal
+1 nb
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 3:20 PM Amye Scavarda Perrin via Lists.Cncf.Io <ascavarda=linuxfoundation.org@...> wrote:
--
Peter Rosell
Senior Software Developer / DevOps
Phone: +46 (0) 10 457 67
+1 nb
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 3:20 PM Amye Scavarda Perrin via Lists.Cncf.Io <ascavarda=linuxfoundation.org@...> wrote:
--
Peter Rosell
Senior Software Developer / DevOps
Phone: +46 (0) 10 457 67
|
By
Peter Rosell
·
#4499
·
|
|
Re: Vote on SIG-Observability Charter
+1 non-binding
--Kiran Mova | Co-Founder, Chief Architect MayaData | kiran.mova@...
https://github.com/openebs/openebs
+1 non-binding
--Kiran Mova | Co-Founder, Chief Architect MayaData | kiran.mova@...
https://github.com/openebs/openebs
|
By
Kiran Mova
·
#4498
·
|
|
Re: Vote on SIG-Observability Charter
+1, nb
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of "Chris Wright via lists.cncf.io" <chrisw=redhat.com@...>
Reply to: "chrisw@..." <chrisw@...>
Date: Thursday, 2. April 2020 at 14:47
To: Brendan Burns
+1, nb
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of "Chris Wright via lists.cncf.io" <chrisw=redhat.com@...>
Reply to: "chrisw@..." <chrisw@...>
Date: Thursday, 2. April 2020 at 14:47
To: Brendan Burns
|
By
Reitbauer, Alois
·
#4497
·
|
|
Re: Vote on SIG-Observability Charter
+1, non-binding
great looking start on a such an important topic
+1, non-binding
great looking start on a such an important topic
|
By
Chris Wright
·
#4496
·
|
|
Re: Vote on SIG-Observability Charter
+1, nb
Philippe
By
Philippe Robin
·
#4495
·
|