cncf-toc@lists.cncf.io

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Messages

Topics Expanded Polls

Export Group Data

Between

and

Re: sig contributor strategy charter ready for vote

+1 binding from me, thank you! -- Liz Rice @lizrice | lizrice.com | +44 (0) 780 126 1145

By Liz Rice · #4339 ·

Re: sig contributor strategy charter ready for vote

+1 (nb), thanks Paris and all.

By Ihor Dvoretskyi · #4338 ·

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cncf-toc] Point of process

Pitching in here, I think most would agree that ideally tools and projects need to be shared openly from their conception. However, I think from the usability point of view we also want to have a

By Ricardo Aravena · #4337 ·

Re: sig contributor strategy charter ready for vote

+1 non-binding --Kiran Mova | Co-Founder, Chief Architect MayaData | kiran.mova@... https://github.com/openebs/openebs

By Kiran Mova · #4336 ·

Re: sig contributor strategy charter ready for vote

+1 NB!! Looking forward to this!! :)

By Stephen Augustus · #4335 ·

sig contributor strategy charter ready for vote

Hi TOC: We are ready for a vote. I know many of you gave +1s when we initially proposed this with the last iteration of TOC, but we are now ready for the final vote with the new crew.

By Paris Pittman <parispittman@...> · #4334 ·

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cncf-toc] Point of process

All of these discussion got me thinking about a few things. I figured I'd share. First, I agree this should have been done in the open from the start. While I didn't run the show and I did ask for

By Matt Farina · #4333 ·

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cncf-toc] Point of process

100% agree with encouraging diversity and not being king makers. However, I also think that applies within projects, not just between projects. I want to make sure that we adopt tools that encourage

By Brendan Burns · #4332 ·

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cncf-toc] Point of process

To add to your thought, Brendan...I believe we should be thorough with our technical due diligence and understand what differentiates one project from another in the same space. And the CNCF, like any

By Erin Boyd · #4331 ·

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cncf-toc] Point of process

I'm in full agreement regarding transparency in the CNCF. However, I think the discussion about OperatorHub has more to do with it's intersection with Helm and the Helm Hub as well as whether Operator

By Brendan Burns · #4330 ·

Re: Point of process

While I recognize the importance and the impact of an initiative like hub.cncf.io to the cloud native mission, I also agree that this should be discussed and introduced in a more open manner. The

By Alex Chircop · #4329 ·

Re: Point of process

Amen!

By Erin Boyd · #4328 ·

Re: Point of process

Yes, I completely agree

By Chris Wright · #4327 ·

Re: Point of process

"kick" --> "kick off", obv ;-) <alexis=weave.works@...> wrote:

By alexis richardson · #4326 ·

Re: Point of process

Heartily seconded! -- Dims-- Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims

By Davanum Srinivas · #4325 ·

Re: Point of process

I believe the issue here is simple. The CNCF is an open organisation and should not develop its own projects in secret. End of story. We saw this happen before eg "cloud native network functions"

By alexis richardson · #4324 ·

Re: Point of process

Agree with the sentiment here. I'd put it as domain squatting or cookie licking is not healthy for the broader industry. What I find uncomfortable here is the potential added component of lack of

By Chris Wright · #4323 ·

Re: CNCF Hub

Thumbs up on the Conf Hub from the Litmus community. The community has a hub (https://hub.litmuschaos.io) for chaos experiments of Kubernetes applications. It will be nice to see the community coming

By Uma Mukkara · #4322 ·

Re: Point of process

Thank you for raising this Chris. I have contacted the TOC multiple times on unfair treatment and inequality, especially when it comes to TOC sponsorship and prioritisation even for sandbox

By Vinod · #4321 ·

Re: Point of process

Lots to unpack here, Chris, and as it’s 11pm I may not do it full justice in this response but I did want to make a couple of quick points: First come, first served project assessment has been a

By Liz Rice · #4320 ·

3661 - 3680 of 7995

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms