cncf-toc@lists.cncf.io

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Messages

Between

and

I'm not personally a fan of RPC, at least for the sort of applications I write. I have lived through several generations of RPC—DCE, Corba, Java RMI, and so on. I'm sure GRPC is the best of the

By Martin Nally <mnally@...> · #435 ·

Re: [VOTE] End User Reference Architecture v1.0

A global service catalogue is an interesting idea. If it is "like DNS but for cloud native apps" then it presupposes an "HTTP but for cloud native apps". Such as a service broker protocol for

By alexis richardson · #434 ·

Re: [VOTE] End User Reference Architecture v1.0

By Ram, J <j.ram@...> · #433 ·

Re: peanut-gallery thoughts about GRPC

Thanks. And, if you're building a new microservice-based application, you need to use something. What are the choices? an RPC system an open-source REST API framework and OpenAPI codegen for

By Brian Grant · #432 ·

Re: peanut-gallery thoughts about GRPC

Fascinating. Thank-you. I shall need at least a day to digest this and respond so please be patient with me :-)

By alexis richardson · #431 ·

Re: peanut-gallery thoughts about GRPC

Thanks Alexis. > Can you please list which ones are notable? The main one seems to be "streaming" replies. Streaming is certainly notable but multiplexing and flow-control are also very important

By Jayant Kolhe <jkolhe@...> · #430 ·

Re: peanut-gallery thoughts about GRPC

Jayant Many thanks. Can you please list which ones are notable? The main one seems to be "streaming" replies. This shouldn't prevent someone building a http 1 compatibility layer, if that what helps

By alexis richardson · #429 ·

Re: peanut-gallery thoughts about GRPC

gRPC protocol was designed to build high performance, cross platform and usable libraries for building microservices. It was designed on top of HTTP2 to explicitly make use of Full duplex streams to

By Jayant Kolhe <jkolhe@...> · #428 ·

Re: peanut-gallery thoughts about GRPC

+1, protocols FTW ;-)

By alexis richardson · #427 ·

Re: peanut-gallery thoughts about GRPC

Since you asked the peanut gallery: I would be delighted to see gRPC supersede Thrift and Finangle for a laundry list of reasons. The crux: being burned by Thrift and Finangle's cross-language and

By Matt T. Proud · #426 ·

Re: peanut-gallery thoughts about GRPC

Brandon, Thank-you. It may help if I mention why I raised the question about HTTP 1.x. Overall we are fans of gRPC at Weaveworks. But we stumbled into some issues when trying to use it in this

By alexis richardson · #425 ·

Re: [VOTE] End User Reference Architecture v1.0

Given that security spans all the layers and is a complex topic, I'm not sure what we'd add at the current level of detail. Service naming, discovery, load balancing, and routing (service fabric/mesh

By Brian Grant · #424 ·

Re: [VOTE] End User Reference Architecture v1.0

YES

By Brian Grant · #423 ·

Re: השב: [VOTE] End User Reference Architecture v1.0

Hi, Yaron. This layer diagram is extremely high-level, and the explanations of the levels are intended to be descriptive rather than exhaustive, so it doesn't preclude the service broker model.

By Brian Grant · #422 ·

Re: peanut-gallery thoughts about GRPC

On gRPC and HTTP 1.x I think the best way to bring gRPC to the HTTP 1.x world is via OpenAPI (formerly swagger) and JSON, see the blog post here: http://www.grpc.io/blog/coreos We do this in etcd v3:

By Brandon Philips <brandon.philips@...> · #421 ·

[devroom-managers] "Cloud and Monitoring" and "Containers and Microservices" devrooms Joint Call for Proposals

FYI for awareness, CNCF is also sponsoring FOSDEM this year Begin forwarded message:

By Chris Aniszczyk · #420 ·

השב: [VOTE] End User Reference Architecture v1.0

Chris, Probably too late to comment, but looking at the charts seems like we are missing a notion of resources binding / dependency, similar to cloud foundry E. G. A web Micro-Service binds to

By Yaron Haviv · #418 ·

Re: [VOTE] End User Reference Architecture v1.0

Sorry, I missed that last call. So apologies if this was discussed. Two thoughts/Questions that come to mind when looking thru the slides: a) Emphasis on security seem to be missing. It

By Ram, J <j.ram@...> · #419 ·

Re: [VOTE] End User Reference Architecture v1.0

YES

By alexis richardson · #417 ·

[VOTE] End User Reference Architecture v1.0

Last week at the CNCF TOC meeting, we discussed issues with the CNCF Reference Architecture and felt it was ready to finalize (and much better than what we had

By Chris Aniszczyk · #416 ·

7561 - 7580 of 7995

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms