|
Re: השב: [VOTE] End User Reference Architecture v1.0
Hi, Yaron.
This layer diagram is extremely high-level, and the explanations of the levels are intended to be descriptive rather than exhaustive, so it doesn't preclude the service broker model.
Hi, Yaron.
This layer diagram is extremely high-level, and the explanations of the levels are intended to be descriptive rather than exhaustive, so it doesn't preclude the service broker model.
|
By
Brian Grant
·
#422
·
|
|
Re: peanut-gallery thoughts about GRPC
On gRPC and HTTP 1.x I think the best way to bring gRPC to the HTTP 1.x world is via OpenAPI (formerly swagger) and JSON, see the blog post here: http://www.grpc.io/blog/coreos
We do this in etcd v3:
On gRPC and HTTP 1.x I think the best way to bring gRPC to the HTTP 1.x world is via OpenAPI (formerly swagger) and JSON, see the blog post here: http://www.grpc.io/blog/coreos
We do this in etcd v3:
|
By
Brandon Philips <brandon.philips@...>
·
#421
·
|
|
[devroom-managers] "Cloud and Monitoring" and "Containers and Microservices" devrooms Joint Call for Proposals
FYI for awareness, CNCF is also sponsoring FOSDEM this year
Begin forwarded message:
FYI for awareness, CNCF is also sponsoring FOSDEM this year
Begin forwarded message:
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#420
·
|
|
השב: [VOTE] End User Reference Architecture v1.0
Chris,
Probably too late to comment, but looking at the charts seems like we are missing a notion of resources binding / dependency, similar to cloud foundry
E. G. A web Micro-Service binds to
Chris,
Probably too late to comment, but looking at the charts seems like we are missing a notion of resources binding / dependency, similar to cloud foundry
E. G. A web Micro-Service binds to
|
By
Yaron Haviv
·
#418
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] End User Reference Architecture v1.0
Sorry, I missed that last call. So apologies if this was discussed.
Two thoughts/Questions that come to mind when looking thru the slides:
a) Emphasis on security seem to be missing. It
Sorry, I missed that last call. So apologies if this was discussed.
Two thoughts/Questions that come to mind when looking thru the slides:
a) Emphasis on security seem to be missing. It
|
By
Ram, J <j.ram@...>
·
#419
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] End User Reference Architecture v1.0
YES
By
alexis richardson
·
#417
·
|
|
[VOTE] End User Reference Architecture v1.0
Last week at the CNCF TOC meeting, we discussed issues with the CNCF Reference Architecture and felt it was ready to finalize (and much better than what we had
Last week at the CNCF TOC meeting, we discussed issues with the CNCF Reference Architecture and felt it was ready to finalize (and much better than what we had
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#416
·
|
|
Re: peanut-gallery thoughts about GRPC
+Varun and Jayant to answer that
+Varun and Jayant to answer that
|
By
Brian Grant
·
#415
·
|
|
Re: peanut-gallery thoughts about GRPC
I'd like to understand why gRPC doesn't work with HTTP 1.x
I'd like to understand why gRPC doesn't work with HTTP 1.x
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#414
·
|
|
peanut-gallery thoughts about GRPC
Hi all,
"I am not on the TOC, but" I did want to share a few thoughts about GRPC per the call the other day.
I was recently at one of those moderated VC dinners where everyone gets put on the spot to
Hi all,
"I am not on the TOC, but" I did want to share a few thoughts about GRPC per the call the other day.
I was recently at one of those moderated VC dinners where everyone gets put on the spot to
|
By
Ben Sigelman
·
#413
·
|
|
RFC: Project Proposal for Fluentd
At yesterday's TOC meeting, we discussed formalizing a Fluentd project proposal after having a great experience collaborating with the Fluentd community:
https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/20
For the
At yesterday's TOC meeting, we discussed formalizing a Fluentd project proposal after having a great experience collaborating with the Fluentd community:
https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/20
For the
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#412
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CNCF Code of Conduct
Yes
By
Jonathan Boulle <jonathan.boulle@...>
·
#411
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CNCF Code of Conduct
Yes.
--
Benjamin Hindman
Founder of Mesosphere and Co-Creator of Apache Mesos
Mesosphere Inc.
Follow us on Twitter: @mesosphere
See how DC/OS elastically runs
containerized apps and data
Yes.
--
Benjamin Hindman
Founder of Mesosphere and Co-Creator of Apache Mesos
Mesosphere Inc.
Follow us on Twitter: @mesosphere
See how DC/OS elastically runs
containerized apps and data
|
By
Benjamin Hindman
·
#410
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CNCF Code of Conduct
YES
By
Brian Grant
·
#408
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CNCF Code of Conduct
Yes
By
alexis richardson
·
#409
·
|
|
[VOTE] CNCF Code of Conduct
From yesterday's TOC meeting, we had discussion around adopting a code of conduct for the CNCF community. We decided to go with what the k8s community has already
From yesterday's TOC meeting, we had discussion around adopting a code of conduct for the CNCF community. We decided to go with what the k8s community has already
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#407
·
|
|
DRAFT slides for TOC call tomorrow
All,
Slides are here -
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xbMsdJdLZzokm8Lf4-S4lr5HauOWOs46V9XSbh011ig/edit#slide=id.gd5ae4e962_2_136
Expected changes:
- gRPC slides to be added
- some mods on
All,
Slides are here -
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xbMsdJdLZzokm8Lf4-S4lr5HauOWOs46V9XSbh011ig/edit#slide=id.gd5ae4e962_2_136
Expected changes:
- gRPC slides to be added
- some mods on
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#406
·
|
|
Re: FYI: OpenTracing formally joins CNCF!
Congrats from the Prometheus side and welcome :)
Congrats from the Prometheus side and welcome :)
|
By
Julius Volz
·
#405
·
|
|
Re: FYI: OpenTracing formally joins CNCF!
Thanks, Chris and the TOC... the OpenTracing folks are excited about this! Hopefully we'll have the opportunity to chat in person at Kubecon next month.
Best wishes,
Ben
ᐧ
Thanks, Chris and the TOC... the OpenTracing folks are excited about this! Hopefully we'll have the opportunity to chat in person at Kubecon next month.
Best wishes,
Ben
ᐧ
|
By
Ben Sigelman
·
#404
·
|
|
Re: FYI: OpenTracing formally joins CNCF!
Excellent!
By
alexis richardson
·
#403
·
|