Paris, On the call today you suggested pairing down the scope of the SIG because there is so much proposed. It occured to me that contributing to the CNCF can mean a lot of things. To large areas are

Thanks TOC and community members for your time today on the call and support via mailing list. Next steps: smooth out the charter and have interested folks step forward to help bootstrap. after, TOC

The CNCF Annual Report for 2019 is live: https://www.cncf.io/cncf-annual-report-2019/ Thank you everyone for a great year, we look forward to serving the community in 2020 and beyond! -- Chris

Vinod Great questions. I recommend you look at two paths to offer help - 1) Please get involved in SIG Security. And maybe connect with Keycloak team and ask them what they plan to do next with

Hi Alexis, I have contacted the TOC 6 months ago offering help in reviewing sandbox submission for which I have already reviewed the quality and used it in production for years. I didn't receive any

The CNCF SIG Runtime has been approved. +1 Binding: 7/9 Alexis Richardson: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/4006 Matt Klein: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/4006 Joe Beda:

Hi all, We'll be meeting tomorrow at 8am Pacific. Current agenda:Vote Updates Annual Review Process TOC Election Update SIG ContribEx Presentation Slides are also available. -- Amye Scavarda

Agreed! This would be a helpful resource. I've had a few situations (especially looking for advice for dealing with crazy "contributors") where I would have loved to use this...

This is wonderful and very needed. I can relate... Thanks for bringing this up! Don’t really know what the perfect setup (zoom? slack? in person meetings?) for such thing would be, but having

I would really need this already, good idea Matt! Lorenzo

+1 nb I think healthy projects have to have happy maintainers and contributors to thrive long-term. Also, part of that is for them to feel genuinely welcomed and included.

All agreed with Matt's points. To add to this, Prometheus has its own mailing list, and this will be true of others I suspect. We have had confusion about how mailing lists are supposed to work in

Hi, Yeah, good idea :) I've always missed networking channels for maintainers, I mean "inter-projects". And for the upcoming CloudNativeCon, I think would be great if CNCF could arrange some

+1 to this idea.

+1 NB. This SIG stands to benefit all projects, and hopefully, help recognize all types of contributors (non-code). I’d like to see a contributor ladder come forth here. - Lee

+1 from me as well. Thanks Paris!

Big +1 from me. Very excited to see this SIG form as I think this is an area that many projects struggle with. The projects that don't struggle with this have some very overworked maintainers. ;)

Hi TOC and community, I'm watching the emails fly by re: maintainer things so figured no time like the present to send this start of a proposal along. I've been working on it for a few weeks and

Liz Rice has called a vote on increasing the requirement to join Sandbox to three TOC sponsors (up from two) as we are increasing the size of the TOC from 9 to 11 seats. This goes into effect with the

I've been confused about this and I know others have been as well so I wanted to see If I have it right now and help others know how the CNCF project maintainer mailing lists work. The details: Each