Last week at the CNCF TOC meeting, we discussed issues with the CNCF Reference Architecture and felt it was ready to finalize (and much better than what we had

+Varun and Jayant to answer that

I'd like to understand why gRPC doesn't work with HTTP 1.x

Hi all, "I am not on the TOC, but" I did want to share a few thoughts about GRPC per the call the other day. I was recently at one of those moderated VC dinners where everyone gets put on the spot to

At yesterday's TOC meeting, we discussed formalizing a Fluentd project proposal after having a great experience collaborating with the Fluentd community: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/20 For the

Yes

Yes. -- Benjamin Hindman Founder of Mesosphere and Co-Creator of Apache Mesos Mesosphere Inc. Follow us on Twitter: @mesosphere See how DC/OS elastically runs containerized apps and data

YES

Yes

From yesterday's TOC meeting, we had discussion around adopting a code of conduct for the CNCF community. We decided to go with what the k8s community has already

All, Slides are here - https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xbMsdJdLZzokm8Lf4-S4lr5HauOWOs46V9XSbh011ig/edit#slide=id.gd5ae4e962_2_136 Expected changes: - gRPC slides to be added - some mods on

Congrats from the Prometheus side and welcome :)

Thanks, Chris and the TOC... the OpenTracing folks are excited about this! Hopefully we'll have the opportunity to chat in person at Kubecon next month. Best wishes, Ben ᐧ

Excellent!

I just wanted to let people know that OpenTracing has formally

FWIW I kicked off a thread about service meshes on the Network-SIG mailing list to gauge how those folks feel about making improvements to the k8s config model to facilitate solutions like

thanks Louis, that is helpful <cncf-toc@...> wrote:

@Alexis, For taxation overheads as a strawman - a simple HTTP/1.1 roundtrip latency percentile distribution at 10^n (n = 2..5) qps with a 4k response payload - CPU time measurement of the proxy under

We have HTTP/2 in alpha. Gory details here: https://github.com/BuoyantIO/linkerd/issues/174 Performance: a heady topic. That post is still accurate. Note that it's focused on a sidecar / low-mem

"standardized assessment" meaning "assessment"? or do you have something in mind?