|
Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cncf-toc] An interesting issue wrt CLA
I will definitely ping GitHub folks about this, but I thought it useful to at least document the desired approach in general.
I will definitely ping GitHub folks about this, but I thought it useful to at least document the desired approach in general.
|
By
Brendan Burns
·
#4046
·
|
|
Re: An interesting issue wrt CLA
Dependabot is a service now owned by GitHub. Do we want to expect all people offering a service like this to sign the CNCF CLA and associate their bot with it? The person choosing to use the bot is
Dependabot is a service now owned by GitHub. Do we want to expect all people offering a service like this to sign the CNCF CLA and associate their bot with it? The person choosing to use the bot is
|
By
Matt Farina
·
#4045
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SIG Runtime
+1 NB
Cheers,
Cathy Zhang
Amazon Data Services Ireland Limited registered office: One Burlington Plaza, Burlington Road, Dublin 4, Ireland. Registered in Ireland. Registration number 390566.
+1 NB
Cheers,
Cathy Zhang
Amazon Data Services Ireland Limited registered office: One Burlington Plaza, Burlington Road, Dublin 4, Ireland. Registered in Ireland. Registration number 390566.
|
By
Hong Zhang <cathy.zhang@...>
·
#4044
·
|
|
Re: An interesting issue wrt CLA
Bots can have delegated authority to sign things on behalf of their makers. It seems like it would be even more important for this kind of a bot to have a signature since if it was compromised or
Bots can have delegated authority to sign things on behalf of their makers. It seems like it would be even more important for this kind of a bot to have a signature since if it was compromised or
|
By
Sarah Allen
·
#4043
·
|
|
An interesting issue wrt CLA
Folks,
See:
https://github.com/kubernetes-client/javascript/pull/384
Dependabot is automatically generating a PR to update vulnerable dependencies, but of course the CNCF CLA is required, and
Folks,
See:
https://github.com/kubernetes-client/javascript/pull/384
Dependabot is automatically generating a PR to update vulnerable dependencies, but of course the CNCF CLA is required, and
|
By
Brendan Burns
·
#4042
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SIG Runtime
+1 NB
--Kiran Mova | Co-Founder, Chief Architect MayaData | kiran.mova@...
https://github.com/openebs/openebs
+1 NB
--Kiran Mova | Co-Founder, Chief Architect MayaData | kiran.mova@...
https://github.com/openebs/openebs
|
By
Kiran Mova
·
#4041
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SIG Runtime
+1 (nb)
Cheers,
Michael
--
Developer Advocate @ AWS
+353 86 0215164
Amazon Data Services Ireland Limited registered office: One Burlington Plaza, Burlington Road, Dublin 4, Ireland. Registered
+1 (nb)
Cheers,
Michael
--
Developer Advocate @ AWS
+353 86 0215164
Amazon Data Services Ireland Limited registered office: One Burlington Plaza, Burlington Road, Dublin 4, Ireland. Registered
|
By
Hausenblas, Michael
·
#4040
·
|
|
Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] SIG Runtime
+1 binding
from Alimail iPhone
+1 binding
from Alimail iPhone
|
By
Li, Xiang
·
#4039
·
|
|
Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] SIG Runtime
+1, binding
--brendan
By
Brendan Burns
·
#4038
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SIG Runtime
CNCF SIGs should not affect Kubernetes SIGs.
CNCF SIGs should not affect Kubernetes SIGs.
|
By
Brian Grant
·
#4037
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SIG Runtime
+1 binding
By
Brian Grant
·
#4036
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SIG Runtime
+1 nb
On 1/7/20 5:39 AM, Amye Scavarda Perrin wrote:
+1 nb
On 1/7/20 5:39 AM, Amye Scavarda Perrin wrote:
|
By
Haining Zhang
·
#4035
·
|
|
[RESULT] SIG Network (Approved)
The CNCF Network SIG has been approved:
https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/317
Binding: 6/9
Matt Klein: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/3757
alexis richardson:
The CNCF Network SIG has been approved:
https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/317
Binding: 6/9
Matt Klein: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/3757
alexis richardson:
|
By
Amye Scavarda Perrin
·
#4034
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SIG Runtime
Xu,
AFAIK, k8s sig-node should remain as it is. Part of this group's focus would be working with sig-node so that runtimes can interface with k8s. For example, having a particular runtime implement
Xu,
AFAIK, k8s sig-node should remain as it is. Part of this group's focus would be working with sig-node so that runtimes can interface with k8s. For example, having a particular runtime implement
|
By
Ricardo Aravena
·
#4033
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SIG Runtime
+1 binding (on the assumption the minor details in the PR get addressed)
--
Liz Rice
@lizrice | lizrice.com | +44 (0) 780 126 1145
On 7 Jan 2020, 14:00 +0000, Pengfei Ni , wrote:
+1 binding (on the assumption the minor details in the PR get addressed)
--
Liz Rice
@lizrice | lizrice.com | +44 (0) 780 126 1145
On 7 Jan 2020, 14:00 +0000, Pengfei Ni , wrote:
|
By
Liz Rice
·
#4032
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SIG Runtime
+1 nb
Best regards.
---
Pengfei Ni
Amye Scavarda Perrin <ascavarda@...> 于2020年1月7日周二 上午5:39写道:
+1 nb
Best regards.
---
Pengfei Ni
Amye Scavarda Perrin <ascavarda@...> 于2020年1月7日周二 上午5:39写道:
|
By
Pengfei Ni
·
#4031
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SIG Runtime
+1 nb
Rabi
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Philippe Robin <Philippe.Robin@...>
Date: Tuesday, 7 January 2020 at 10:18
To: "ascavarda@..." <ascavarda@...>, CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: Re:
+1 nb
Rabi
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Philippe Robin <Philippe.Robin@...>
Date: Tuesday, 7 January 2020 at 10:18
To: "ascavarda@..." <ascavarda@...>, CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: Re:
|
By
Rabi Abdel
·
#4030
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SIG Runtime
+1 nb
Philippe
By
Philippe Robin
·
#4029
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SIG Runtime
+1 non-binding!
By
Nikhita Raghunath
·
#4028
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SIG Runtime
+1 nb
--
L.
By
Leonardo Di Donato
·
#4027
·
|