I would like to publicly call that each "Selecting Group" adhere to process changes that I mentioned (publicly publishing all nominees and who nominated them, and allowing for public comment on the

Please wait until Monday for us to publish the post as stated before, there will be a maintainer election policy put forth that was discussed at the last GB meeting and will be published to

As a maintainer, I would also appreciate this information. :) -- Jaice Singer DuMars Open Source Strategy, Open Source Programs Office +1 (206) 371-2293 345 Spear St., San Francisco CA 94105

While the GB and End User TAB have processes in place to create a list of nominees for which to vote on, the non-sandbox project maintainers do not. This is new for them. Can you please outline how

<caniszczyk@...> wrote: This is phrased as if all projects suggest one common nominee. Prometheus team understood the process to be that every project suggests a person and then all

+1 Great suggestion Matt. Best Regards, Shannon Williams Rancher Labs shannon@... +1 650-521-6902

The process is baked into the charter here (6)(e): https://github.com/cncf/foundation/blob/master/charter.md#6-technical-oversight-committee-toc I don't have a problem in publicizing the "Qualified

+1 I think this is an excellent suggestion

During this nomination cycle, is there any reason that we can't: Make all nominations public, with who / what org nominated the nominee. Some ability for a public comment period on the nominees. If

Thanks Chris!-- Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims

There will be 11 seats total: - 6 nominees from the Governing Board (GB) - 2 nominees from the End User Community (up from 1) - 1 nominee from the non-sandbox project maintainers (up from 0) - 2

Chris, Thanks for the blog post. Do we have numbers for how many people are eligible to cast votes in each "Selecting Group"? As i read it, just 3 of the seats (2 from EUC and 1 from non-sandbox) are

Hi Nicola - Thanks for your email. I do not believe there are however you are welcome to email the below email in case they have additional information. kcsp@... Best, Jessie -- Jessie Adams

We are working on a blog post, PR that should go out next week describing the election process, we will open nominations this month with results coming here:

Chris, Amye, et al With the TOC adding 2 seats, what do people do if they want to stand? More generally as we discussed at Kubecon, how are we making the TOC process more open & inclusive? alexis

Liz and Michelle, Thanks for putting this together. The first time I had to work on a good sized conference I wished someone had put something like this together. - Matt Farina

As ex-KC/CNC co-chairs, Michelle and I started talking about some things we wished we had known beforehand, and how we could start trying to pass these thoughts on down the chain of new co-chairs.

Hello everyone, there are some discount for KCSP or KTP for join to Kubecon of Amsterdam? Thank you for the answer. Have a good day.

It would be great if we could be tracking this effort on github... Chris A: do you think https://github.com/cncf/toc/issues/248 is a good issue to add on to? I'm not if you intended for this to

Thanks Sarah. I added flow specifically for sandbox to this document as well to maybe fine grain out each flow for each