Thanks Yuri and Matt. This has been helpful for me. I realised what was bothering me. I think we should graduate Jaeger; but when we do so I think we should also provide some thoughts on the state

Thanks, Matt. Yes, I wouldn't disagree about the niche qualification. Adopting tracing is relatively difficult today due to lack of reusable instrumentation, which will hopefully change with

I will let @Yuri Shkuro and @Gary Brown chime in, but FWIW, my own take is that distributed tracing in general is still fairly niche and likely to be found at early adopter companies/enterprises. I'm

Ticketmaster is an enterprise. So is Uber but they are the parent Co. Weaveworks is not an enterprise, it is a small isv. Has jaeger found much traction among, say, non members of CNCF? My worry

We are probably about to get way off topic, but just to make sure I understand, what exactly is the definition of an enterprise here? Is Ticketmaster an enterprise? Is Uber?

I'm interested in end users who are also willing to self identify as enterprises. Prometheus has a lot of these. I had hoped Jaeger would be similar. Again it's not a deal breaker for me at all, but

Are you specifically referring to enterprise reselling/platform and not end-users?

Not that this should be a blocker but how much evidence of enterprise or CSP use is Jaeger seeing? Weaveworks are a happy user, as documented here.

Hi folks, Here is Jaeger's due diligence document for review prior to the graduation vote: Please take a look at this document as well as the graduation PR and comment away! Thanks to Yuri and Gary

OK thanks, we opened the issue here and would like to present this Wednesday if possible: https://github.com/cncf/sig-app-delivery/issues/8. Is this new process documented somewhere? It's hard to

So we are working on getting the SIGs more engaged in the process of helping to review projects. https://github.com/cncf/sig-app-delivery/issues where we should be working to get SIG App-Delivery to

All, The KUDO project presented at the TOC meeting in mid September and we were wondering what the next steps are. At the end of our presentation there was talk that SIG App Delivery would get

Sending round the TOC for any initial thoughts ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Justin Cappos <justincappos@...> Date: 5 Oct 2019, 13:26 +0100 To: Liz Rice <liz@...> Cc: Amye Scavarda

Hi, Since inception of CNCF SIGs, we’ve intended to breathe new life into the Networking WG, reincarnating it as a SIG with a redefined charter. Its draft charter is now ready for broad review and

Likewise, I need to miss, apologies!

Apologies but I will miss the meeting today due to travel.

Hi all! We'll be meeting today:

Hi all, We'll be meeting Tuesday: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Rrg4vg1EUBWsGszECNRF7St3EtBeESGlsGTh3_yXJx8/edit#slide=id.g25ca91f87f_0_0

Hi A few of us have put together a draft charter for the CNCF Core SIG. We would like to distribute it more widely for community feedback now. If you have an interest in this area, please reach out

The NATS team would be happy to volunteer a maintainer to represent messaging/streaming.