I meant the monthly public TOC meetings (1st Tue of the month, the ones that aren't dedicated for project reviews) On 17 Aug 2019, 15:08 +0100, Sarah Allen <sarah@...>, wrote:

It would be great to hear about what all the SIGs are doing at a TOC meeting, and have a regular time/place to share updates from SIG-Security. I think I'm missing a little context -- I couldn't

I'm going to assume that folks didn't respond because they think it's a good idea :-) Amye, please could you coordinate with the SIG chairs and get them onto the agenda for the next public TOC

Hola TOC and interested readers, a few weeks ago I've presented KubeVirt to you, with goal to find sponsors for KubeVirt submission to the CNCF Sandbox. Back then there was the ask about early

I'll be back from vacation Tue 13. Q

Doh. 12th is Monday.

Hi all Following a steer from Liz: Michelle and I have agreed this schedule for getting to a vote on the charter for CNCF App Delivery SIG. 12 Aug (Tuesday) Close TOC / community comments on draft

Yes - this makes sense - happy to do this. It would also serve as a means to get TOC feedback and for the SIG to raise any items that might require TOC discussion. If there are items that require a

Hi everyone, I’d like to suggest that every SIG should have a space on the TOC open meeting agenda to present an update. I’m picturing a summary of recent SIG outputs, upcoming plans, maybe a

Thanks, really great work by the Kubernetes Security Audit WG to see this to completion! Folks have asked for the threat model and I've attached that here along with the output from the audit. --

This is really helpful. I appreciate the expediency and fully understand the tension between transparency and disclosure embargoes and decisions therein. Best, Ruben

thanks Sarah!

Hey all, today we announced and open sourced the results of Kubernetes Security Audit: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/3975 -- Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719

I'll miss today's meeting. I left some comments on SIG App Charter -- seems like other folks have left comments. Assume the vote is on TOC Liaisons for the new SIG, might be good for new chairs to

Hey all, we are meeting

+1 non-binding From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of "Chris Aniszczyk via Lists.Cncf.Io" <caniszczyk=linuxfoundation.org@...> Reply-To: "caniszczyk@..." <caniszczyk@...> Date: Friday, August 2, 2019 at

Hi TOC, I am an Open Source evangelist and I work in the application security domain. I am not associated with Red Hat company. I love Open Source and Open Standard and especially the software

+1 binding, with thanks to everyone who contributed to rkt over the years Liz On 3 Aug 2019, 17:48 +0100, Steven Dake <steven.dake@...>, wrote:

+1 NB.

+1 binding