Thanks for kicking off this thread, Gareth. I'm reminded of a couple things when it comes to attribution and bias: Academic and society papers (e.g., ACM) have author attribution including

Agreed, this is an important point, and good to expose to sunlight. I like Alexis’ authorship statements and the point about listing authors and their affiliations. Sometimes people’s biases

Thanks for raising this Gareth. This is an open issue for SIG Security where we have a growing number of individuals participating in assessments and an open issue to write up guidelines:

Thanks for posting this Gareth. IMO it is better to be open about bias than to pretend it away. We could state that documents coming from CNCF TOC & SIGs are marked as "Authored by members of the

Hi All On a couple of calls yesterday (SIG Security, and discussions about the proposed SIG App Delivery), the topic of bias or conflict of interest came up. In discussion we thought it worth

FYI for prospectuses around CNCF project related events for organizations that are interested ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Dan Kohn <dan@...> Date: Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 11:04

Hi everyone, The TOC Project Presentation meetings will now be held on the 3rd Tuesday of the month instead of the 2nd Tuesday. We have updated the meeting invitation to reflect this change. Please

Hi everyone, We held a closed TOC meeting this week and made progress on the project proposal backlog. The meeting notes are now added to the working doc. Liz

Three cheers for Thanos! <caniszczyk@...> wrote:

For the record, I volunteered to sponsor also during the meeting. On 7/9/19, 9:50 AM, "cncf-toc@... on behalf of alexis richardson" <cncf-toc@... on behalf of

I am happy to sponsor Thanos for CNCF Sandbox. <caniszczyk@...> wrote:

Hey all, we had three project proposal presentations from the community today: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1jhzJlSAAJNNil1nIYp60eSMH3LPd6AwqHLt3vEAzMSg/edit#slide=id.g25ca91f87f_0_0 Thanos

Hey all, the agenda for tomorrow's community presentation meeting is

Hi, Further to this thread, the CNCF Storage SIG has been prepping a simple questionnaire: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1heH9mGBjvBvA08hUDrlSBrw9ANGSnNGNZkraliTR5H0/edit?usp=sharing The idea was

Hi, I would suggest the workflow states that the project must exist and have a minimum of adoption, otherwise, it could lead to "elevator pitch" to validate ideas. -- Eduardo Silva Principal

Folks, I'm quite tardy, but I created the proposed flow-chart for the project adoption process as discussed 2 meetings

Just a friendly reminder that the CFP for KubeCon + CloudNativeCon NA closes soon: https://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/kubecon-cloudnativecon-north-america-2019/cfp/ Please get your submissions

Thanks, we will put something together in the coming week.-- Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719

thanks all! a high level overview on the main site would be great!

Hi Quinton and MIchael, You are both correct. SAFE WG started as a group separate from CNCF. Many early members joined the group with the assumption that the goal of the group was to become a CNCF