cncf-toc@lists.cncf.io

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Messages

Between

and

The CNCF Security SIG has been approved: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/146 +1 binding TOC votes (7/9): Alexis: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/3304 Brendan:

By Chris Aniszczyk · #3368 ·

CNCF TOC Agenda 6/4/2019

Here's a friendly reminder that we meet

By Chris Aniszczyk · #3367 ·

Re: Encouraging diversity through the SIGs

+1. This does seem to be going in the right direction. Thanks

By H.Gaikwad@... · #3366 ·

Re: [VOTE] CNCF Security SIG

I thought I had already voted but apparently sent it just to Chris. I can't email. For the record: +1 binding!

By Joe Beda <jbeda@...> · #3365 ·

Re: Encouraging diversity through the SIGs

+1. Do it. Sent from the virtual desk of Chris Didato. (Please excuse the brevity and any typos).

By chrisdidato@gmail.com · #3364 ·

Re: Encouraging diversity through the SIGs

Excellent points! I'd love to see more auto transcription if that is feasible.

By alexis richardson · #3363 ·

Re: Encouraging diversity through the SIGs

I applaud the definition of diversity as more than gender.... though we should be a bit careful about using the term "diversity of thought" (since that has emerged as a code word used by some who

By Sarah Allen · #3362 ·

Re: Clarifying TOC Sponsor and Sandbox entry requirements

I'll work on adding an FAQ before next week's TOC meeting on this topic and some other things that have been in the backlog: https://github.com/cncf/toc/issues/248 re 3 TOC sponsors, created an issue

By Chris Aniszczyk · #3361 ·

Re: Clarifying TOC Sponsor and Sandbox entry requirements

Thanks Alexis! This helps a lot, but also highlights the need to get the docs to match the reality so that projects know what is going to be asked of them. We need to get that full questionnaire for

By Liz Rice · #3360 ·

Re: Clarifying TOC Sponsor and Sandbox entry requirements

Liz Excellent! Let me try to clarify our previous processes, to date. The roles of sponsor have been very different for Incubation & Sandbox. 1) Incubation: the sponsor acts as a champion for the

By alexis richardson · #3359 ·

Clarifying TOC Sponsor and Sandbox entry requirements

Hello TOC folks, We have some slightly conflicting / ambiguous documentation which I’d like to get tidied up (partly inspired by this issue). It seems odd that Sandbox requires two sponsors but

By Liz Rice · #3358 ·

Re: [VOTE] CNCF Security SIG

+1 non-binding

By Xing Yang · #3357 ·

Re: Encouraging diversity through the SIGs

Very good point! Suggestions on this (or pointers to existing examples) would be welcome and super-helpful

By Liz Rice · #3356 ·

Re: [VOTE] CNCF Security SIG

+1 non-binding

By Jacopo Nardiello · #3355 ·

Re: [VOTE] CNCF Security SIG

+1 nb :) L.

By Leonardo Di Donato · #3354 ·

Re: Encouraging diversity through the SIGs

Let's do the best we can, knowing it will be flawed, and get better over time.

By Jaice Singer DuMars <jaice@...> · #3353 ·

Re: Encouraging diversity through the SIGs

(Even without the typo. I’ll yield the floor now.) Roger B.A. Klorese Senior Product Manager SUSE 705 5th Ave S, Suite 1000 Seattle WA 98104 (P)+1 206.217.7432 (M)+1

By Roger Klorese <roger.klorese@...> · #3352 ·

Re: Encouraging diversity through the SIGs

Thanks. As a Jewish (and raised before we were as widely viewed as “white”) white-skinned not entirely cis queer person, I wonder whether we need to compete for the allotted seats at the table,

By Roger Klorese <roger.klorese@...> · #3351 ·

Re: Encouraging diversity through the SIGs

IMO: a diversity goal here is true internationalization

By alexis richardson · #3350 ·

Re: Encouraging diversity through the SIGs

As a Jewish, white-skinned, gender non-conforming individual, I understand. I would give up my place at the table, however, for a person of color or other under-represented person. Yes, there's a

By Jaice Singer DuMars <jaice@...> · #3349 ·

4641 - 4660 of 8006

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms