cncf-toc@lists.cncf.io

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Messages

Between

and

Re: Encouraging diversity through the SIGs

As a Jewish, white-skinned, gender non-conforming individual, I understand. I would give up my place at the table, however, for a person of color or other under-represented person. Yes, there's a

By Jaice Singer DuMars <jaice@...> · #3349 ·

Re: Encouraging diversity through the SIGs

(Though I would say that stating the issue solely as “white” and “men” is reductive in the gender issue, ignores the heteronormativity, and ignores physical, developmental, and other

By Roger Klorese <roger.klorese@...> · #3348 ·

Re: Encouraging diversity through the SIGs

+1 for this +1. Roger B.A. Klorese Senior Product Manager SUSE 705 5th Ave S, Suite 1000 Seattle WA 98104 (P)+1 206.217.7432 (M)+1 425.444.5493 roger.klorese@... Schedule a meeting:

By Roger Klorese <roger.klorese@...> · #3347 ·

Re: Encouraging diversity through the SIGs

+1 as well, and glad to see this conversation moving forward. One point I want to make absolutely clear is that diversity does not mean "corporate diversity" or "diversity of thought" or any other

By Jaice Singer DuMars <jaice@...> · #3346 ·

Re: Encouraging diversity through the SIGs

Liz, Thank you so much for bringing this up, it's definitely something I'm thinking about as we build out sustainable SIGs. Confab (content strategy conference) just had a very good keynote on this:

By Amye Scavarda Perrin · #3345 ·

Re: Encouraging diversity through the SIGs

+1 and a comment: It has seemed to me so far that the term “diversity” at CNCF is widely assumed to mean “more, and more equitable representation of, women.” I attended a diversity session at

By Roger Klorese <roger.klorese@...> · #3344 ·

Re: Encouraging diversity through the SIGs

Yes, clearly, supporting and encouraging diversity is well-placed suggestion. +1. Steve, I thought of sending this same request earlier. I agree. Examples would elicit desired behavior as well as

By Lee Calcote · #3343 ·

Re: Encouraging diversity through the SIGs

I defer to the experts here but I highly recommend taking this free course we put together and require for all staff as a

By Chris Aniszczyk · #3342 ·

Re: [VOTE] CNCF Security SIG

+1 (non binding). Thanks Suresh

By Suresh Krishnan · #3341 ·

Re: Encouraging diversity through the SIGs

Might I suggest that along with the requirements we include specific examples for the SIG leads for how they might go about increasing the diversity within their SIG? SIG leads might be supportive but

By Stephen Watt · #3340 ·

Re: Encouraging diversity through the SIGs

+1 -- Erin A. Boyd Senior Principal Software Engineer, OCTO Red Hat eboyd@...

By Erin Boyd · #3339 ·

Re: Encouraging diversity through the SIGs

+1 -- Mark Coleman T. +31 6 52 13 49 60 W. www.implicit-explicit.com Hello. We are the Implicit-Explicit company. Connectors at large. You and your users should meet. Really. You should.

By Mark Coleman <mark@...> · #3338 ·

Re: Encouraging diversity through the SIGs

Indeed +1 This is great ! Thanks, Vineet

By Vineet Gupta · #3337 ·

Re: Encouraging diversity through the SIGs

Huge +1!!

By Stephen Augustus · #3336 ·

Encouraging diversity through the SIGs

Alexis just shared an idea with me that I think is so great that I wanted to act immediately! This comes out of discussions with several folks at KubeCon and elsewhere about how we can improve

By Liz Rice · #3335 ·

Re: [VOTE] CNCF Security SIG

+1 great step to benefit for all industries . Thanks

By Vineet Gupta · #3334 ·

Re: [VOTE] CNCF Security SIG

Enthusiastic +1 non-binding 🎉

By Andrew Martin · #3333 ·

Re: [VOTE] CNCF Security SIG

+1 non-binding. -- Tom Keiser tom@...

By Tom Keiser · #3332 ·

Re: [VOTE] CNCF Security SIG

+1 non-binding

By Igor Mameshin · #3331 ·

Re: [VOTE] CNCF Security SIG

+1 non-binding

By Justin Cappos <jcappos@...> · #3330 ·

4661 - 4680 of 8007

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms