|
Re: Encouraging diversity through the SIGs
Yes, clearly, supporting and encouraging diversity is well-placed suggestion. +1.
Steve, I thought of sending this same request earlier. I agree. Examples would elicit desired behavior as well as
Yes, clearly, supporting and encouraging diversity is well-placed suggestion. +1.
Steve, I thought of sending this same request earlier. I agree. Examples would elicit desired behavior as well as
|
By
Lee Calcote
·
#3343
·
|
|
Re: Encouraging diversity through the SIGs
I defer to the experts here but I highly recommend taking this free course we put together and require for all staff as a
I defer to the experts here but I highly recommend taking this free course we put together and require for all staff as a
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#3342
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CNCF Security SIG
+1 (non binding).
Thanks
Suresh
+1 (non binding).
Thanks
Suresh
|
By
Suresh Krishnan
·
#3341
·
|
|
Re: Encouraging diversity through the SIGs
Might I suggest that along with the requirements we include specific examples for the SIG leads for how they might go about increasing the diversity within their SIG? SIG leads might be supportive but
Might I suggest that along with the requirements we include specific examples for the SIG leads for how they might go about increasing the diversity within their SIG? SIG leads might be supportive but
|
By
Stephen Watt
·
#3340
·
|
|
Re: Encouraging diversity through the SIGs
+1
--
Erin A. Boyd
Senior Principal Software Engineer, OCTO
Red Hat
eboyd@...
+1
--
Erin A. Boyd
Senior Principal Software Engineer, OCTO
Red Hat
eboyd@...
|
By
Erin Boyd
·
#3339
·
|
|
Re: Encouraging diversity through the SIGs
+1
--
Mark Coleman
T. +31 6 52 13 49 60
W. www.implicit-explicit.com
Hello.
We are the Implicit-Explicit company.
Connectors at large.
You and your users should meet.
Really.
You should.
+1
--
Mark Coleman
T. +31 6 52 13 49 60
W. www.implicit-explicit.com
Hello.
We are the Implicit-Explicit company.
Connectors at large.
You and your users should meet.
Really.
You should.
|
By
Mark Coleman <mark@...>
·
#3338
·
|
|
Re: Encouraging diversity through the SIGs
Indeed +1
This is great !
Thanks,
Vineet
Indeed +1
This is great !
Thanks,
Vineet
|
By
Vineet Gupta
·
#3337
·
|
|
Re: Encouraging diversity through the SIGs
Huge +1!!
By
Stephen Augustus
·
#3336
·
|
|
Encouraging diversity through the SIGs
Alexis just shared an idea with me that I think is so great that I wanted to act immediately! This comes out of discussions with several folks at KubeCon and elsewhere about how we can improve
Alexis just shared an idea with me that I think is so great that I wanted to act immediately! This comes out of discussions with several folks at KubeCon and elsewhere about how we can improve
|
By
Liz Rice
·
#3335
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CNCF Security SIG
+1 great step to benefit for all industries .
Thanks
+1 great step to benefit for all industries .
Thanks
|
By
Vineet Gupta
·
#3334
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CNCF Security SIG
Enthusiastic +1 non-binding 🎉
Enthusiastic +1 non-binding 🎉
|
By
Andrew Martin
·
#3333
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CNCF Security SIG
+1 non-binding.
--
Tom Keiser
tom@...
+1 non-binding.
--
Tom Keiser
tom@...
|
By
Tom Keiser
·
#3332
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CNCF Security SIG
+1 non-binding
By
Igor Mameshin
·
#3331
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CNCF Security SIG
+1 non-binding
By
Justin Cappos <jcappos@...>
·
#3330
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CNCF Security SIG
+1 non-binding
On 30/05/19 1:17 AM, Chris Aniszczyk wrote:
-- Cheers & Best regards,Feilong Wang
+1 non-binding
On 30/05/19 1:17 AM, Chris Aniszczyk wrote:
-- Cheers & Best regards,Feilong Wang
|
By
Feilong Wang <feilong@...>
·
#3329
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CNCF Security SIG
+1 binding
By
Brian Grant
·
#3328
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CNCF Security SIG
+1 binding
By
Liz Rice
·
#3327
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CNCF Security SIG
+1 non-binding
By
Maor Goldberg
·
#3326
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CNCF Security SIG
+1 nb
On 5/29/19 9:17 PM, Chris Aniszczyk wrote:
+1 nb
On 5/29/19 9:17 PM, Chris Aniszczyk wrote:
|
By
Haining Zhang
·
#3325
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CNCF Security SIG
+1 (non-binding)
I'm really happy to see this becoming (or potentially becoming) an official SIG. In talking to a lot of users in the Cloud Native space. practical advice around security is something
+1 (non-binding)
I'm really happy to see this becoming (or potentially becoming) an official SIG. In talking to a lot of users in the Cloud Native space. practical advice around security is something
|
By
Michael Ducy
·
#3324
·
|