|
Re: [VOTE] CNCF Security SIG
+1 non binding :)
By
Lorenzo Fontana <fontanalorenz@...>
·
#3308
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CNCF Security SIG
+1nb - looking forward to contributing!
--
Nathan ShimekVP of Client SolutionsP 415-940-2786
+1nb - looking forward to contributing!
--
Nathan ShimekVP of Client SolutionsP 415-940-2786
|
By
nathan.shimek@...
·
#3307
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CNCF Security SIG
+1 non-binding.
SJ
By
Sunil James <sunil@...>
·
#3306
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CNCF Security SIG
+1, super excited about it and will contribute.
Cheers,
Michael
--
Developer Advocate @ AWS
+353 86 0215164
Amazon Data Services Ireland Limited registered office: One Burlington Plaza,
+1, super excited about it and will contribute.
Cheers,
Michael
--
Developer Advocate @ AWS
+353 86 0215164
Amazon Data Services Ireland Limited registered office: One Burlington Plaza,
|
By
Hausenblas, Michael
·
#3305
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CNCF Security SIG
+1 binding
By
alexis richardson
·
#3304
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CNCF Security SIG
+1 nb
By
Justin Cormack
·
#3303
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CNCF Security SIG
+1/nb
Roger B.A. Klorese
Senior Product Manager
SUSE
705 5th Ave S, Suite 1000
Seattle WA 98104
(P)+1 206.217.7432
(M)+1 425.444.5493
roger.klorese@...
Schedule a meeting:
+1/nb
Roger B.A. Klorese
Senior Product Manager
SUSE
705 5th Ave S, Suite 1000
Seattle WA 98104
(P)+1 206.217.7432
(M)+1 425.444.5493
roger.klorese@...
Schedule a meeting:
|
By
Roger Klorese <roger.klorese@...>
·
#3302
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CNCF Security SIG
Excellent. +1 non-binding.
Excellent. +1 non-binding.
|
By
Lee Calcote
·
#3301
·
|
|
[VOTE] CNCF Security SIG
A new CNCF Security SIG has been proposed with Liz Rice and Joe Beda as the TOC liaisons. The Co-Chairs: Sarah Allen, Dan Shaw, Jeyappragash JJ
Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the
A new CNCF Security SIG has been proposed with Liz Rice and Joe Beda as the TOC liaisons. The Co-Chairs: Sarah Allen, Dan Shaw, Jeyappragash JJ
Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#3300
·
|
|
CNCF interactions with Huawei
CNCF interactions with Huawei are covered by this statement from the Linux Foundation:
https://www.linuxfoundation.org/blog/2019/05/linux-foundation-statement-on-huawei-entity-list-ruling/
In short,
CNCF interactions with Huawei are covered by this statement from the Linux Foundation:
https://www.linuxfoundation.org/blog/2019/05/linux-foundation-statement-on-huawei-entity-list-ruling/
In short,
|
By
Dan Kohn <dan@...>
·
#3299
·
|
|
Reminder: TOC Session at KubeCon EU 2019 @ 1155am
Just a reminder, we have a TOC session at 1155am today:
https://kccnceu19.sched.com/event/Ngtv
Essentially it will be an open meeting, with some intros + questions and then we will have an open Q&A
Just a reminder, we have a TOC session at 1155am today:
https://kccnceu19.sched.com/event/Ngtv
Essentially it will be an open meeting, with some intros + questions and then we will have an open Q&A
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#3298
·
|
|
[RESULT] CNCF Storage SIG (APPROVED)
The CNCF Storage SIG has been approved:
https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/234
+1 binding TOC votes (6/9):
Alexis: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/3248
Xiang:
The CNCF Storage SIG has been approved:
https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/234
+1 binding TOC votes (6/9):
Alexis: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/3248
Xiang:
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#3297
·
|
|
Re: the challenge of documentation
I can't speak to what was discussed at the meeting, but I agree that the contributors need help. In my experience, they (mostly) do want to produce good documentation.
Many projects would benefit
I can't speak to what was discussed at the meeting, but I agree that the contributors need help. In my experience, they (mostly) do want to produce good documentation.
Many projects would benefit
|
By
Sarah Allen
·
#3296
·
|
|
Re: the challenge of documentation
Great articulation, thank you Brian. IMO this adds more weight to the argument for hiring another writer to help the projects with these doc challenges.
Great articulation, thank you Brian. IMO this adds more weight to the argument for hiring another writer to help the projects with these doc challenges.
|
By
Liz Rice
·
#3295
·
|
|
Re: the challenge of documentation
Thank you Brian. That’s a really good point.
Thank you Brian. That’s a really good point.
|
By
Michelle Noorali <michelle.noorali@...>
·
#3294
·
|
|
[RESULT] tikv moving to incubation (APPROVED)
The tikv project has been approved to the incubation maturity level from sandbox: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/221
+1 binding TOC votes (7/9):
Alexis:
The tikv project has been approved to the incubation maturity level from sandbox: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/221
+1 binding TOC votes (7/9):
Alexis:
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#3293
·
|
|
the challenge of documentation
The challenge of documentation was mischaracterized in the GB/TOC meeting today.
It's less that contributors don't want to produce good documentation, but that it requires specialized expertise to do
The challenge of documentation was mischaracterized in the GB/TOC meeting today.
It's less that contributors don't want to produce good documentation, but that it requires specialized expertise to do
|
By
Brian Grant
·
#3292
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] tikv moving to incubation
+1 binding
By
Matt Klein
·
#3291
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] tikv moving to incubation
+1 binding
By
Michelle Noorali
·
#3290
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] tikv moving to incubation
+1 (non-binding)
--
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
+1 (non-binding)
--
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
|
By
Davanum Srinivas
·
#3289
·
|