|
Re: [VOTE] Archiving Project Process v1.0
+1 nb
By
Ruben Orduz <orduzr@...>
·
#3238
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Archiving Project Process v1.0
+1 binding.
Jeff
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Matt Klein <mattklein123@...>
Date: Tuesday, May 7, 2019 at 12:32 PM
To: Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>
Cc: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...>
Subject:
+1 binding.
Jeff
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Matt Klein <mattklein123@...>
Date: Tuesday, May 7, 2019 at 12:32 PM
To: Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>
Cc: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...>
Subject:
|
By
Brewer, Jeff
·
#3237
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Archiving Project Process v1.0
+1 binding.
By
Matt Klein
·
#3236
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Archiving Project Process v1.0
+1
From:Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>
To:CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...>
Date:2019-05-07 11:18:07
Subject:[cncf-toc] [VOTE] Archiving Project Process v1.0
Hey all, on the TOC call today we decided to move
+1
From:Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>
To:CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...>
Date:2019-05-07 11:18:07
Subject:[cncf-toc] [VOTE] Archiving Project Process v1.0
Hey all, on the TOC call today we decided to move
|
By
Quinton Hoole
·
#3235
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Archiving Project Process v1.0
+1 nb
Eduardo Arango
Software Engineer
Sylabs,Inc
Git: @ArangoGutierrez
Twitter: @CarlosEArango
+1 nb
Eduardo Arango
Software Engineer
Sylabs,Inc
Git: @ArangoGutierrez
Twitter: @CarlosEArango
|
By
eduardo@...
·
#3234
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Archiving Project Process v1.0
+1 binding
By
Michelle Noorali
·
#3233
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Archiving Project Process v1.0
+1 binding
By
Joe Beda
·
#3232
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Archiving Project Process v1.0
+1 from me.
--
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
+1 from me.
--
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
|
By
Davanum Srinivas
·
#3231
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Archiving Project Process v1.0
+1 binding
By
Li, Xiang
·
#3230
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Archiving Project Process v1.0
+1 (non-binding)
By
David McKay <david.andrew.mckay@...>
·
#3229
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Archiving Project Process v1.0
+1
By
alexis richardson
·
#3228
·
|
|
[VOTE] Archiving Project Process v1.0
Hey all, on the TOC call today we decided to move forward with
formalizing the archiving process for projects after a bunch of
discussion.
Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full
Hey all, on the TOC call today we decided to move forward with
formalizing the archiving process for projects after a bunch of
discussion.
Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#3227
·
|
|
Have to drop, apologies!
--brendan
By
Brendan Burns
·
#3226
·
|
|
Universal Data Plane API Working Group (UDPA-WG)
Hi CNCF TOC,
We (Matt Klein and myself, on behalf of Envoy) would like to propose the creation of a new CNCF working group dedicated to developing the Universal Data Plane API (UDPA).
The TL;DR is
Hi CNCF TOC,
We (Matt Klein and myself, on behalf of Envoy) would like to propose the creation of a new CNCF working group dedicated to developing the Universal Data Plane API (UDPA).
The TL;DR is
|
By
Harvey Tuch <htuch@...>
·
#3225
·
|
|
Re: Agenda for 5/7/2019 TOC meeting
done
--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
done
--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#3224
·
|
|
Re: Agenda for 5/7/2019 TOC meeting
Hi Chris
Please add the CNCF Storage SIG charter.
https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/234
Thanks
Q
________________________________________
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2019 8:31 AM
To: CNCF TOC
Subject:
Hi Chris
Please add the CNCF Storage SIG charter.
https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/234
Thanks
Q
________________________________________
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2019 8:31 AM
To: CNCF TOC
Subject:
|
By
Quinton Hoole
·
#3223
·
|
|
Agenda for 5/7/2019 TOC meeting
Here's the agenda for tomorrow's
Here's the agenda for tomorrow's
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#3222
·
|
|
Re: Archiving process
SGTM
Projects may need more than 2 weeks to respond.
Q
SGTM
Projects may need more than 2 weeks to respond.
Q
|
By
Quinton Hoole
·
#3221
·
|
|
Archiving process
There is progress on the proposed process for archiving projects - any comments?
Thanks,
Liz
There is progress on the proposed process for archiving projects - any comments?
Thanks,
Liz
|
By
Liz Rice
·
#3220
·
|
|
Re: RFC: Strimzi
Tom,
Excellent
Think of these clusters as "tenants".
Super
Now imagine traffic flowing into the Kube cluster. If the kafka clusters become overloaded, is there a way to share traffic fairly, without
Tom,
Excellent
Think of these clusters as "tenants".
Super
Now imagine traffic flowing into the Kube cluster. If the kafka clusters become overloaded, is there a way to share traffic fairly, without
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#3219
·
|