|
Re: RFC: Strimzi
Yes, of course.
Each Kafka cluster has a distinct set of users, topics, policies, etc. Nothing would be shared.
Kind regards,
Tom
Yes, of course.
Each Kafka cluster has a distinct set of users, topics, policies, etc. Nothing would be shared.
Kind regards,
Tom
|
By
Tom Bentley
·
#3218
·
|
|
Re: RFC: Strimzi
Tom
Yes but what happens when there are two or more clusters? Does Strimzi support creation of multiple Kafka clusters in one kubernetes cluster? If so, then those clusters may require different
Tom
Yes but what happens when there are two or more clusters? Does Strimzi support creation of multiple Kafka clusters in one kubernetes cluster? If so, then those clusters may require different
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#3217
·
|
|
Re: RFC: Strimzi
Hi Alexis,
Strimzi provides operators which make it easy for different users to create their own Kafka clusters, (plus topics, users etc within those clusters). It does not provide support for a
Hi Alexis,
Strimzi provides operators which make it easy for different users to create their own Kafka clusters, (plus topics, users etc within those clusters). It does not provide support for a
|
By
Tom Bentley
·
#3216
·
|
|
Re: RFC: Strimzi
Tom
Fantastic news - congratulations.
Perhaps I misunderstood but isn't one goal of Strimzi to enable Kafka-aaS.
Tom
Fantastic news - congratulations.
Perhaps I misunderstood but isn't one goal of Strimzi to enable Kafka-aaS.
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#3215
·
|
|
Re: RFC: Strimzi
Hi Alexis,
I just wanted to let people know that the project has now adopted an open governance model (https://github.com/strimzi/strimzi-kafka-operator/blob/master/GOVERNANCE.md) as a first step. We
Hi Alexis,
I just wanted to let people know that the project has now adopted an open governance model (https://github.com/strimzi/strimzi-kafka-operator/blob/master/GOVERNANCE.md) as a first step. We
|
By
Tom Bentley
·
#3214
·
|
|
Re: Announcing Telecom User Group (TUG)
That sounds like a great idea Cheryl. I will not be in Barcelona but will be able to join the Zoom calls and contribute to the work.
Thanks
Suresh
That sounds like a great idea Cheryl. I will not be in Barcelona but will be able to join the Zoom calls and contribute to the work.
Thanks
Suresh
|
By
Suresh Krishnan
·
#3213
·
|
|
Re: Announcing Telecom User Group (TUG)
Hi Cheryl,
Excellent news…
Dell Technologies would like to participate in the TUG activities.
/br Michael
_____________________
Michael M. Damena
DTS Global Principal
Hi Cheryl,
Excellent news…
Dell Technologies would like to participate in the TUG activities.
/br Michael
_____________________
Michael M. Damena
DTS Global Principal
|
By
michael.damena@...
·
#3212
·
|
|
Re: Announcing Telecom User Group (TUG)
Hi Cheryl,
Hi all,
Component Soft, a European cloud and cloud native training and consulting company whose most important customers are global telco vendors and operators, would like to also
Hi Cheryl,
Hi all,
Component Soft, a European cloud and cloud native training and consulting company whose most important customers are global telco vendors and operators, would like to also
|
By
Erno Erdelyi
·
#3211
·
|
|
Re: Announcing Telecom User Group (TUG)
Hi,
I‘d like to join the TUG being a telco vendor from ZTE.
王长金 Wang ChangJin
电信云及核心网产品团队/无线产品经营部 CCN Product Team/Wireless Product
Hi,
I‘d like to join the TUG being a telco vendor from ZTE.
王长金 Wang ChangJin
电信云及核心网产品团队/无线产品经营部 CCN Product Team/Wireless Product
|
By
wang.changjin@...
·
#3210
·
|
|
Re: Announcing Telecom User Group (TUG)
Hi,
I would like to join from Nokia side if possible.
Br,
Gerg0
Hi,
I would like to join from Nokia side if possible.
Br,
Gerg0
|
By
Gergely Csatari
·
#3209
·
|
|
Re: Apologies
No worries, it's cancelled.
Enjoy the vacation!
--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
No worries, it's cancelled.
Enjoy the vacation!
--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#3208
·
|
|
Re: Apologies
And I am also on vacation this week and so also apologise for missing TOC tomorrow. Will be back next week though.
Liz
On 15 Apr 2019, 11:03 +0200, alexis richardson <alexis@...>, wrote:
And I am also on vacation this week and so also apologise for missing TOC tomorrow. Will be back next week though.
Liz
On 15 Apr 2019, 11:03 +0200, alexis richardson <alexis@...>, wrote:
|
By
Liz Rice
·
#3207
·
|
|
Apologies
I shall miss TOC tomorrow and next week due to vacation.
I shall miss TOC tomorrow and next week due to vacation.
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#3206
·
|
|
Re: CNCF Storage SIG - Mission/Purpose/Ownership?
Thanks Saad. Agreed, if we are admitting more projects into the Sandbox, we have to be much clearer about what level of endorsement (or lack of) that implies. I'd like to have some discussion on this
Thanks Saad. Agreed, if we are admitting more projects into the Sandbox, we have to be much clearer about what level of endorsement (or lack of) that implies. I'd like to have some discussion on this
|
By
Liz Rice
·
#3205
·
|
|
Re: Announcing Telecom User Group (TUG)
That's a great news for China Mobile.
I'd like to join in this group
Xuan Jia
China Mobile
Cheryl Hung <chung@...> 于2019年4月12日周五 下午11:55写道:
That's a great news for China Mobile.
I'd like to join in this group
Xuan Jia
China Mobile
Cheryl Hung <chung@...> 于2019年4月12日周五 下午11:55写道:
|
By
Xuan Jia <jason.jiaxuan@...>
·
#3204
·
|
|
Re: Incubation of OpenEBS in to CNCF?
FWIW, this was part of my intention with https://github.com/cncf/toc/issues/214. I think we can do a much better job of onboarding folks to the process and expectations. These documentation/landing
FWIW, this was part of my intention with https://github.com/cncf/toc/issues/214. I think we can do a much better job of onboarding folks to the process and expectations. These documentation/landing
|
By
Matt Klein
·
#3203
·
|
|
Re: Incubation of OpenEBS in to CNCF?
+1, well said Erin
By
alexis richardson
·
#3202
·
|
|
Re: Incubation of OpenEBS in to CNCF?
This does bring up a point where perhaps we (TOC + TOC contributors) need to create a means of communicating this more simplistically to any new user/developer/contributor so they can understand the
This does bring up a point where perhaps we (TOC + TOC contributors) need to create a means of communicating this more simplistically to any new user/developer/contributor so they can understand the
|
By
Erin Boyd
·
#3201
·
|
|
Re: Incubation of OpenEBS in to CNCF?
Thanks Saad
I agree, and have worked long and hard on and with the TOC to have any explicit or implicit endorsement of Sandbox projects removed. Whatever remains is despite my best efforts. If you
Thanks Saad
I agree, and have worked long and hard on and with the TOC to have any explicit or implicit endorsement of Sandbox projects removed. Whatever remains is despite my best efforts. If you
|
By
Quinton Hoole <quinton@...>
·
#3200
·
|
|
Re: CNCF Storage SIG - Mission/Purpose/Ownership?
Thanks for taking the time to respond Liz and Shannon!
I agree that the timing is not quite right. We can't make SIG sponsorship a requirement for new projects before SIGs even exist -- we have to let
Thanks for taking the time to respond Liz and Shannon!
I agree that the timing is not quite right. We can't make SIG sponsorship a requirement for new projects before SIGs even exist -- we have to let
|
By
Saad Ali <saadali@...>
·
#3199
·
|