Hi, Thank you for your comments and the opportunity to present Strimzi to the TOC yesterday. We are keen to work towards neutral open governance of the project and think that the link to the Cortex

Keycloak does indeed have built-in support for MFA, but it is currently limited to one-time passwords (HOTP or TOTP). It is possible to extend Keycloak to add additional custom MFA mechanisms and we

As this may come up I wanted to clarify the relationship between Keycloak and RH-SSO. Keycloak is the community project and is freely available for anyone to use. RH-SSO is built directly from

Actually, domain-mode is not relevant. Domain-mode is a feature of WildFly that allows creating and managing a group of servers, but this is not relevant in Kubernetes since it already has this

Greetings, Sorry I could not make the call today, but I did want to raise some concerns I have had over Keycloak. One is the fact that, at heart, it is still a login/password system. There is some

Thanks for the presentation. Very informative. The questions I (and Joe) had around HA and scalability are at least partially answered in the installation

I am a potential sponsor. for me to buy in: I'd like to see a neutral gov & roadmap plus plans from david on achieving unambiguous neutrality, plus thoughts on what would be useful as a 'spun out'

Hey all, we heard from the Strimzi project today: https://github.com/cncf/toc/issues/138 There were questions about if the ZK aspects of the operator could be pulled out as its own project. There

There is nothing RHT enterprise specific and it is backed fully by proven upstream technologies with active communities. Regarding clustering and concerns expressed in the chat there is a way to

The Keycloak project presented today: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/176 The TOC, especially Joe had some questions on how Keycloak was deployed on Wildfly (vs the RHT enterprise version of that).

Hello All, I would like to second Erin’s idea for CNCF role in telco softwares, they are majorly driven towards NFV base deployments . Since I am coming from telco security companies a large

Hey all, we are meeting tomorrow, focused on community presentations to catch up on the CNCF community presentation

The CRI-O project has been approved to join the CNCF incubator: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/177 +1 binding TOC votes (6/9): Matt: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/3018 Alexis:

+1 (non-binding)

+1 binding

+1 binding

Like finding the right team from universities that we could collaborate with, many even funding at certain level if needed ? Basically we need a communication channel and a defined mechanism for

Could this work be done under the new Governance/Security SIG forming? I'm not sure what the specific ask is here outside of a place to collaborate / meet maybe? -- Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) |

Hi TOC members, In today's Policy WG's meeting[0] we discussed the possibility of introducing formal verification into the cloud native world in conjunction with policy engine, to form a complete

+1 (non-binding)