|
Re: Fluentd Graduation Request (2017-2019)
+1 (nb)
Roger B.A. Klorese
Senior Product Manager
SUSE
705 5th Ave S, Suite 1000
Seattle WA 98104
(P)+1 206.217.7432
(M)+1 425.444.5493
roger.klorese@...
Schedule a meeting:
+1 (nb)
Roger B.A. Klorese
Senior Product Manager
SUSE
705 5th Ave S, Suite 1000
Seattle WA 98104
(P)+1 206.217.7432
(M)+1 425.444.5493
roger.klorese@...
Schedule a meeting:
|
By
Roger Klorese <roger.klorese@...>
·
#3090
·
|
|
Re: Fluentd Graduation Request (2017-2019)
Thanks for the summary, Eduardo. And sorry this has taken so long.
I believe Fluentd is ready for graduation, and would like to call a vote.
Adoption of fluentd is widespread, as can be seen on its
Thanks for the summary, Eduardo. And sorry this has taken so long.
I believe Fluentd is ready for graduation, and would like to call a vote.
Adoption of fluentd is widespread, as can be seen on its
|
By
Brian Grant
·
#3089
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] OPA moving to incubation
+1 binding
--
Liz Rice
@lizrice | lizrice.com | +44 (0) 780 126 1145
+1 binding
--
Liz Rice
@lizrice | lizrice.com | +44 (0) 780 126 1145
|
By
Liz Rice
·
#3088
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] OPA moving to incubation
+1 non-binding.
By
Deepak Vij <deepak.vij@...>
·
#3087
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] OPA moving to incubation
+1 binding
On Mar 26, 2019, at 6:30 AM, Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:
+1 binding
On Mar 26, 2019, at 6:30 AM, Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:
|
By
Brewer, Jeff
·
#3086
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] OPA moving to incubation
+1 (non binding)
By
Justin Cormack
·
#3085
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] OPA moving to incubation
+1 non binding
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of "Chris Short via Lists.Cncf.Io" <chris=chrisshort.net@...>
Reply-To: <chris@...>
Date: Tuesday, March 26, 2019 at 7:45 AM
To: Chris Aniszczyk
+1 non binding
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of "Chris Short via Lists.Cncf.Io" <chris=chrisshort.net@...>
Reply-To: <chris@...>
Date: Tuesday, March 26, 2019 at 7:45 AM
To: Chris Aniszczyk
|
By
Jon Mittelhauser
·
#3084
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] OPA moving to incubation
+1 non-binding
--
Chris Short
Web | Newsletter | Twitter
+1 non-binding
--
Chris Short
Web | Newsletter | Twitter
|
By
Chris Short
·
#3083
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] OPA moving to incubation
+1 binding
By
alexis richardson
·
#3082
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] OPA moving to incubation
+1
--brendan
By
Brendan Burns
·
#3081
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] OPA moving to incubation
+1 nb
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>
Date: Tuesday, March 26, 2019 at 9:30 AM
To: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] OPA moving to incubation
+1 nb
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>
Date: Tuesday, March 26, 2019 at 9:30 AM
To: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] OPA moving to incubation
|
By
Geri Jennings
·
#3080
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] OPA moving to incubation
+1 (non-binding)
By
Justin Cappos
·
#3079
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] OPA moving to incubation
+1 (non-binding)
By
Ayrat Khayretdinov <akhayretdinov@...>
·
#3078
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] OPA moving to incubation
+1 non-binding, from policy wg we are really glad OPA has made such great progress :)
--
Zhipeng (Howard) Huang
Principle Engineer
OpenStack, Kubernetes, CNCF, LF Edge, ONNX, Kubeflow, OpenSDS, Open
+1 non-binding, from policy wg we are really glad OPA has made such great progress :)
--
Zhipeng (Howard) Huang
Principle Engineer
OpenStack, Kubernetes, CNCF, LF Edge, ONNX, Kubeflow, OpenSDS, Open
|
By
Zhipeng Huang
·
#3077
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CNCF SIGs Proposal
+1 non-binding
By
Ken Owens
·
#3076
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] OPA moving to incubation
+1 non-binding.
Just as I finally get around to providing requested feedback this morning… the vote goes out. JIT feedback.
- Lee
+1 non-binding.
Just as I finally get around to providing requested feedback this morning… the vote goes out. JIT feedback.
- Lee
|
By
Lee Calcote
·
#3075
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] OPA moving to incubation
+1 (non-binding)
By
Ken Owens
·
#3074
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] OPA moving to incubation
A question out of curiosity here. Shouldn't the movement of projects across various stages in CNCF be based on how many of the end user community and customers have adopted and how the product is
A question out of curiosity here. Shouldn't the movement of projects across various stages in CNCF be based on how many of the end user community and customers have adopted and how the product is
|
By
Rakshith Venkatesh
·
#3073
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] OPA moving to incubation
+1 non binding
--
Christian Posta
twitter: @christianposta
http://blog.christianposta.com
+1 non binding
--
Christian Posta
twitter: @christianposta
http://blog.christianposta.com
|
By
Christian Posta
·
#3072
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] OPA moving to incubation
+1 (non-binding).
By
Ihor Dvoretskyi
·
#3071
·
|