+1 (non-binding)

+1 non-binding, from policy wg we are really glad OPA has made such great progress :) -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Principle Engineer OpenStack, Kubernetes, CNCF, LF Edge, ONNX, Kubeflow, OpenSDS, Open

+1 non-binding

+1 non-binding. Just as I finally get around to providing requested feedback this morning… the vote goes out. JIT feedback. - Lee

+1 (non-binding)

A question out of curiosity here. Shouldn't the movement of projects across various stages in CNCF be based on how many of the end user community and customers have adopted and how the product is

+1 non binding -- Christian Posta twitter: @christianposta http://blog.christianposta.com

+1 (non-binding).

OPA has requested to move to the incubation maturity level: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/199 Since entering the CNCF Sandbox, OPA has demonstrated growth and progress. 12 releases were published

+ 1

+1 binding

Hello TOC!, My name is Eduardo Silva from Fluentd project. On November 2016, sponsored by Brian Grant, Fluentd joined CNCF in the Incubating stage. One year later in November 2017, we submitted PR

The CNCF is being looked to as a thought leader, and as I read the mission statement it seems to clearly evoke a strong leadership role “fostering and sustaining an ecosystem.” I like Liz’s

GitHub is fine. I think someone approved my moderated message to this list quite some time after I sent it. I sent this message before filling on GitHub, and I filed on GitHub because I realized I

Yup. I kind of like what we did in the Serverless WG. We produced a whitepaper and landscape doc to help people understand what serverless is all about, what's going on in the community, what's out

+100 to what Liz said. I think that the Storage and Serverless working groups have created very useful "landscape white papers" (see below) to clarify common terminology, ways to evaluate alternative

When I was writing the SIG Responsibilities I added a bullet under the end user education section that reads: I don’t know if I would call this “thought leadership” in the typical sense. The

Thanks Liz for pointing out my use of 'thought leadership' is not really what I intended. I just wanted to share with the TOC that many projects/people/companies do look to the CNCF as the

"Thought leadership" in the sense of innovation - this fundamentally has to come from across the community. The TOC, with support and input from the new SIGs, is curating, not inventing. I doubt

Hi Erin, I have heard similar requests from multiple companies, so thanks for raising this. I agree that clarity would benefit the different communities involved. I suggest the SIGs seek input from