+1 non binding-- Bob Killen Research Cloud Administrator University of Michigan

+1 (non-binding) -- Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims

+1 nb -- Liz Rice @lizrice | lizrice.com | +44 (0) 780 126 1145

+1 non-binding thanks -Doug _______________________________________________________ STSM | IBM Open Source, Cloud Architecture & Technology (919) 254-6905 | IBM 444-6905 | dug@... The more I'm

+1 (non binding)

+1 (non-binding) Thanks, - Phil Chris Aniszczyk wrote on 2/18/19 11:59 AM:

+1 nb Sent by mobile; please excuse my brevity.

+1 (non-binding).

containerd has requested to move to the graduation maturity level: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/165 The containerd community believes it has fulfilled all the graduation criteria: - Have a healthy

+1 for kicking the vote :-)

Final reminder here on any reviews/comments, I plan on kicking the vote early next week.-- Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719

On the last TOC call there was a call to look at updating the graduation requirements and also to look at the various CII levels: https://github.com/cncf/toc/issues/196 One idea was to potentially

Hi TOC The document has been moved to a PR: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/194 Chris, it looks like we need to do a few updates on our GitHub repo to reflect the new TOC members – the list is out

Thanks. I posted a link to the review presentation and project health dashboard to the PR. A link to the CII badge status details is also in the PR. TOC members: PTAL and ask questions if there is

+1 -- Cheers, Chris Aniszczyk http://aniszczyk.org +1 512 961 6719

Could we please push that out a week? A week isn't a sufficient amount of time for any serious diligence.

Hey all, now that we have a newly formed TOC, we are back to tackling backlog of project/graduation requests. At the TOC call today, we discussed that containerd will be next and offer a week of

From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of <Li> Date: Tuesday, February 5, 2019 at 09:28 To: "cncf-toc@..." <cncf-toc@...> Subject: Re: [cncf-toc] CNCF SIGs Proposal Quinton> Yes, that’s the intention,

Xiang, Below: I don't think that's a "MUST HAVE", but it would be Nice. Well, one aim of all this is that SIGs help to identify project gaps for CNCF, and some of the pre-solicitation and

Thanks for putting this together! I have a few questions and comments on the proposal. Questions: 1. Does every existing CNCF project need to be assigned to a SIG? 2. Does every candidate project