cncf-toc@lists.cncf.io

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Messages

Topics Expanded Polls

Export Group Data

Between

and

Re: CNCF SIGs Proposal

RegSec?

By alexis richardson · #2849 ·

Re: CNCF SIGs Proposal

+1 that "Governance" isn't a great name for this security-related SIG. I'd suggest "Security and Compliance". In many cases end users are concerned not just with security but also with associated

By Liz Rice · #2848 ·

FYI: Summer of Code 2019 + CNCF

CNCF plans on participating in Summer of Code again this year: https://github.com/cncf/soc#project-ideas If you're a CNCF project/mentor interested in participating, please submit a project idea with

By Chris Aniszczyk · #2847 ·

Re: CNCF SIGs Proposal

I agree with Sarah, and this is where most people missunderstand policy - they think of it in terms of governance instead of a set of rules which provides constraints for a cluster. Could we change it

By Zhipeng Huang · #2846 ·

Re: Thank-yous (was Re: [cncf-toc] CNCF SIGs Proposal)

+1.

By Brian Grant · #2845 ·

Thank-yous (was Re: [cncf-toc] CNCF SIGs Proposal)

Quinton has done all the "final" edits, and the team of volunteers (Erin, Matt, Alex & some others) got the doc into an editable state. THANK-YOU! a

By alexis richardson · #2844 ·

Re: CNCF SIGs Proposal

Overall the doc looks great -- thanks Alexis for your editorial work and Quinton for moving this forward! One small point on naming of a specific SIG: Governance security, authentication,

By Sarah Allen <sarahallen@...> · #2843 ·

Re: CNCF SIGs Proposal

From: Brian Grant <briangrant@...> Date: Friday, February 1, 2019 at 07:24 To: Quinton Hoole <quinton.hoole@...> Cc: "cncf-toc@..." <cncf-toc@...>, Erin Boyd <eboyd@...>, Sarah Allen

By Quinton Hoole · #2842 ·

Re: CNCF SIGs Proposal

Maybe we can put the doc into GitHub and capture comments in there. Geri - we had commenting turn on before and we had hundreds of comments so it was intended to provide a cleaner view of the document

By Erin Boyd · #2841 ·

Re: CNCF SIGs Proposal

Erin (and Quinton), Yes, Quinton's edits and clarification are spot on - and much appreciated! Many thanks! Diane -- Kind Regards, Diane Mueller Director, Community Development Red Hat

By Diane Mueller · #2840 ·

Re: CNCF SIGs Proposal

Thanks for all the work on this. It's much improved. I think the proposed governance model should address concerns with earlier proposals. What is meant by "high level roadmap of projects within this

By Brian Grant · #2839 ·

Re: CNCF SIGs Proposal

Is there a way to have the ability to add comments and notes directly in the doc? In read-only mode, it is hard to provide much detailed feedback. Thanks, Geri Jennings CyberArk From:

By Geri Jennings · #2838 ·

Re: Potentially OT question

Info on becoming a Kubernetes Certified Service Provider is at https://www.cncf.io/certification/kcsp/. Please feel free to follow up with me and/or info@... if you have any questions. -- Dan Kohn

By Dan Kohn <dan@...> · #2837 ·

Potentially OT question

Hi there, we are a silver member of CNCF and were wondering how one gets added to the following? https://landscape.cncf.io/category=kubernetes-certified-service-provider&grouping=organization Thanks

By Dan Hubbard <dan@...> · #2836 ·

Re: CNCF SIGs Proposal

Does this sufficiently cover what you are looking for, Diane? Let us know. Thanks, Erin

By Erin Boyd · #2835 ·

Re: CNCF SIGs Proposal

I added the following to the main doc to clarify: "SIGs are formed by the TOC. Initial SIGs are listed below, and will be adapted over time as required. If members of the community believe that

By Quinton Hoole · #2834 ·

Re: CNCF SIGs Proposal

Oh, now I understand where the confusion arose. There is a link in the intro of the main document to a description of the differences between Kubernetes SIGs and CNCF SIGS. That’s where the

By Quinton Hoole · #2833 ·

Re: Congrats and Questions!

Thanks for the feedback all!

By Stephen Watt · #2832 ·

Re: CNCF SIGs Proposal

My apologies Diane – I just reread the Operating Model section and you’re right - it’s not sufficiently clear on the point you raised. I will add some wording to the effect of my email reply

By Quinton Hoole · #2831 ·

Re: Congrats and Questions!

Stephen This came up indirectly at the Kubecon 'meet the TOC' session, when Jaice asked what we are doing to make the TOC more diverse. Several people responded. One idea, that I have high hopes

By alexis richardson · #2830 ·

5161 - 5180 of 8007

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms