From: Brian Grant <briangrant@...> Date: Friday, February 1, 2019 at 07:24 To: Quinton Hoole <quinton.hoole@...> Cc: "cncf-toc@..." <cncf-toc@...>, Erin Boyd <eboyd@...>, Sarah Allen

Maybe we can put the doc into GitHub and capture comments in there. Geri - we had commenting turn on before and we had hundreds of comments so it was intended to provide a cleaner view of the document

Erin (and Quinton), Yes, Quinton's edits and clarification are spot on - and much appreciated! Many thanks! Diane -- Kind Regards, Diane Mueller Director, Community Development Red Hat

Thanks for all the work on this. It's much improved. I think the proposed governance model should address concerns with earlier proposals. What is meant by "high level roadmap of projects within this

Is there a way to have the ability to add comments and notes directly in the doc? In read-only mode, it is hard to provide much detailed feedback. Thanks, Geri Jennings CyberArk From:

Info on becoming a Kubernetes Certified Service Provider is at https://www.cncf.io/certification/kcsp/. Please feel free to follow up with me and/or info@... if you have any questions. -- Dan Kohn

Hi there, we are a silver member of CNCF and were wondering how one gets added to the following? https://landscape.cncf.io/category=kubernetes-certified-service-provider&grouping=organization Thanks

Does this sufficiently cover what you are looking for, Diane? Let us know. Thanks, Erin

I added the following to the main doc to clarify: "SIGs are formed by the TOC. Initial SIGs are listed below, and will be adapted over time as required. If members of the community believe that

Oh, now I understand where the confusion arose. There is a link in the intro of the main document to a description of the differences between Kubernetes SIGs and CNCF SIGS. That’s where the

Thanks for the feedback all!

My apologies Diane – I just reread the Operating Model section and you’re right - it’s not sufficiently clear on the point you raised. I will add some wording to the effect of my email reply

Stephen This came up indirectly at the Kubecon 'meet the TOC' session, when Jaice asked what we are doing to make the TOC more diverse. Several people responded. One idea, that I have high hopes

The short answer is yes. But so far, just for the TOC-elected seats. A TOC Contributor did previously win a TOC-elected TOC seat. I would like to see a change in distribution who votes for the TOC

Short answer is yes and this path exists somewhat already, many CNCF members did end up nominating contributors, of the 30+ nominees many of them were already TOC Contributors. It was very competitive

Is the CNCF trying to create a path for TOC Contributors to grow into the TOC? I think its a good thing when folks who are consistently showing up and doing the work are rewarded for it. If we want

We plan on bringing this up in the next TOC meeting on Feb 5th (next Tuesday)-- Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719

Quinton, If you are referring to this one sentence: "The TOC makes use of this input to act as an informed and effective executive board to select and promote appropriate CNCF projects and

Hi, Congrats to all the folks on the brand-new TOC! :) I spotted a few concerns in the community around the TOC election and wanted to see if anyone had thoughts about them. One was around diversity

Thanks Diane I think that’s adequately covered in the doc - the TOC creates and approves SIG’s. If anyone believes we need to create more SIG’s, they should, by implication, ask the TOC to do