Stephen This came up indirectly at the Kubecon 'meet the TOC' session, when Jaice asked what we are doing to make the TOC more diverse. Several people responded. One idea, that I have high hopes

The short answer is yes. But so far, just for the TOC-elected seats. A TOC Contributor did previously win a TOC-elected TOC seat. I would like to see a change in distribution who votes for the TOC

Short answer is yes and this path exists somewhat already, many CNCF members did end up nominating contributors, of the 30+ nominees many of them were already TOC Contributors. It was very competitive

Is the CNCF trying to create a path for TOC Contributors to grow into the TOC? I think its a good thing when folks who are consistently showing up and doing the work are rewarded for it. If we want

We plan on bringing this up in the next TOC meeting on Feb 5th (next Tuesday)-- Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719

Quinton, If you are referring to this one sentence: "The TOC makes use of this input to act as an informed and effective executive board to select and promote appropriate CNCF projects and

Hi, Congrats to all the folks on the brand-new TOC! :) I spotted a few concerns in the community around the TOC election and wanted to see if anyone had thoughts about them. One was around diversity

Thanks Diane I think that’s adequately covered in the doc - the TOC creates and approves SIG’s. If anyone believes we need to create more SIG’s, they should, by implication, ask the TOC to do

Quinton et al, Would it be possible to ask for a section in the Operator Model on how one goes about proposing a new SIG and the process for getting it approved? (or if there is documentation on this

I recruited David Wheeler to create the Best Practices Badge for CII and worked with him to create both the passing and higher milestone levels and build the BadgeApp. David is open to making

Greetings to the new TOC Late last year Alexis kicked off a public discussion regarding forming CNCF SIG’s (initially referred to as Categories). Since then a few of us have collaborated on

I agree it's a great start. Personally I think we should come up with a custom variant the tweaks some of the values and focuses on some key common elements. I think if we want to go down this road

Matt, most of the things you mention are fairly well covered by the CII Best Practices program, a basic version of which is currently a CNCF graduation requirement, as Brian detailed below. I would

I would be weary of requiring quantification of scalability or performance as a graduation project requirement, mainly because in my experience it's virtually impossible to accurately do so given the

I think “production ready” has a lot to do with known, accurate and well-documented limitations, as opposed to no limitations at all, or vague claims, or an absolute set of metrics that need to be

Welcome new TOC members! We have several projects asking for graduation reviews: Fluentd, containerd, TUF, NATS, and Jaeger. I didn't participate in some recent project graduation votes because I

Hey all, here are the results for the GB-selected TOC seats:

The vote for CoreDNS moving to the graduation maturity level has been approved: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/172 https://www.cncf.io/announcement/2019/01/24/coredns-graduation/ +1 binding TOC

+1 non binding -- Christopher LILJENSTOLPECo-Founder & CTO, SolutionsTigeracdl@... | @liljenstolpe | @liljenstolpeFollow us: Blog | Twitter | LinkedInZero Trust Network Security & Continuous

+1 binding -- Benjamin Hindman Founder of Mesosphere and Co-Creator of Apache Mesos Mesosphere Inc. Follow us on Twitter: @mesosphere Follow Us