I think it's important to ensure that we don't end up with projects scattered across multiple locations. The objective should always be to put all projects on the cluster. In my opinion, it's one of

I've proposed a "reference architecture" environment people could experience by "renting" time (at $0) to illustrate cloud native vs traditional virtualization approaches like openstack. Several of us

i sense a CNCF Cloud in the works ;-) Diane -- Kind Regards, Diane Mueller Director, Community Development Red Hat OpenShift @openshiftcommons We have more in Common than you know, learn more at

This would be very useful for the Docker developers as well! They would love to have access too, would that be ok?

yes it could

All, The Fedora team has been asking for access to the cncf cluster for some testing of their Fedora cloud projects. Could this "opening" up include them as a potential guest on the cluster? Diane

Have the folks apply for cluster access here by creating an issue and filling out the template: https://github.com/cncf/cluster/issues -- Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719

Hi all, Thanks for supporting Camille's idea on widening the availability of the CNCF Cluster to more open source projects! Towards NEXT STEPS: 1) Camille please let ZK team know the answer is Yes.

Yes. When Ken and I created this stack, we first analysed all the projects that we could think of, that are in the space. I want to share this info ASAP, but need to spend an hour cleaning it up.

hmm I guess it depends on the audience then. I might agree that from an app developer perspective the points of interop in the old pict might not be of great interest, but from a CNCF project

Doug, IMHO the old one is quite hard to understand, especially for developers who might use CNCF projects. This is an attempt to simplify the picture somewhat. At the end of the day most developers

On the new reference architecture picture I have a few comments/questions: 1 - what is driving the need for a new one rather than tweaking the existing one? 2 - I actually prefer the old one. I like

all, https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1h8HFOAVLrJTvjUPP6ZHG2SzVKsTaMLvbiqjzUj4vml8/edit?ts=578d8da0#slide=id.g15e23e5137_1_0 comments actively sought a

Happy to help! Ticket in progress to update Community to Projects. Thanks, Brett -- Brett Preston The Linux Foundation +1 (971) 303-9030 bpreston@... Google Talk: bpreston@... Skype: bprestoncf

don't spin your wheels yet please let's discuss your proposal as a group.

Sorry but is this a no or not now wrt using this cluster? I don't have time to spend on fruitless initiatives so if we're not yet clear on the purpose of this cluster yet I'm not going to spin my

Brett Preston, our new project coordinator, would be happy to manage the process. I'm fine changing from Community to Projects. If you or others can propose some improved text, we can quickly make the

Many thanks Camille. This is a very interesting topic. I don't think we can throw the doors open to all projects, but I do think that your email touches on many places where interoperation &

Dan, Chris, Who is the best person to work with on clarifying the projects proposals process on the website? I think that the current website design makes this info a little hard to find. Should

Hi folks, So the ZooKeeper community has expressed some interest in using the CNCF cluster to set up a more sharable testing infrastructure for release verification. Are we open to this sort of thing?