+1 binding

The Harbor community has requested to move to the incubation maturity level and believes it has fulfilled the criteria: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/163 They have also created a presentation on

Alexis has informed me there's conflicts so we will cancel the TOC meeting for tomorrow. He's also stated the graduation reviews will be moved to the next TOC meeting on the 20th and the TOC plans to

Hello everyone! A few weeks ago we’ve announced the third-annual CNCF Community Awards. Based on the community feedback, we’ve decided to extend the nomination phase for an extra week as many

Hey all, here is a summary of maintainer survey results this year: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1NkaMG5FUf06m6397A-wb3IW0ibjisyRBg3rUuUI7Mu0/edit#slide=id.g44dbd86c82_0_338 Thanks everyone

Quinton, 100% of the changes to the charter were from votes by the GB and recorded in the GB minutes. In order to create the git history, we will be manually going through each board meetings minutes

Thanks Chris I don’t think that there’s particular urgency in manually stitching together git commits, but more importantly, according to the Charter: 18. Amendments This charter may be amended

I get your point, historically it's been a word doc because that's how lawyers love to craft these things initially. We put the charter now on GitHub as the canonical source:

I think it’s important that we have a public record of historical changes to the charter (like the one you made below, but I’m sure there are others that came before it). Could you make that

It's updated on the website now but lives in a word doc. We are moving the charter to GitHub to make our lives easier and that will be the canonical source moving forward. -- Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) |

Thanks Chris Where is the canonical version of the charter, and it’s change history? Is it in GitHub somewhere? I can’t seem to find it. Thanks Q From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Bryan Cantrill

Chris, Thanks for the quick resolution, and for communicating it to promptly to CNCF members! - Bryan

Bryan, you’re correct that three years ago all CNCF members participated in the nomination process. Reviewing the meeting minutes, I found the resolution that changed the nomination language. It was

There are some more details here, such as which TOC members were elected by which group: https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/process/election-schedule.md

I don't think that that's correct -- or rather, I don't see any grammatical way that "each individual (entity or member) eligible to nominate a TOC member may nominate..." can possibly refer to

Totally agree that it's a bit confusing at first, but on the nomination point: "Each individual (entity or member) eligible to nominate a TOC member may nominate" refers to the previous clause which

Chris, I'm a little confused about the nomination process. In particular, I can't see where in the charter it describes who many nominate candidates for the TOC. In section 6(e)(ii) it says: But I

TOC and wider community, there's been some discussion with the TOC about formalizing an archiving process for CNCF projects and what that would mean for projects. Please take a look at this issue and

Hey TOC and wider community, we have a set of project graduation/incubation reviews coming up that we want to share with the wider community: containerd (graduation):

TOC nominations are starting TODAY for the 6 TOC slots that open up in Jan 2019 that are selected by GB members (they can propose UP TO TWO NOMINEES as part of the GB, where you can only nominate up