|
Re: Discuss CloudNaticeCon/KubeCon technical content at the TOC
Has there been a survey of attendees from previous conferences? Is there data that shows attendees dissatisfaction with the content and specific areas?
Has there been a survey of attendees from previous conferences? Is there data that shows attendees dissatisfaction with the content and specific areas?
|
By
Yuri Shkuro
·
#2556
·
|
|
Discuss CloudNaticeCon/KubeCon technical content at the TOC
I would like to request that we have a discussion in a TOC meeting on the Con technical content. I’m happy to help curate items to discuss on it.
Three ideas I would initially seed the list with
I would like to request that we have a discussion in a TOC meeting on the Con technical content. I’m happy to help curate items to discuss on it.
Three ideas I would initially seed the list with
|
By
Matt Farina
·
#2555
·
|
|
Re: Thoughts on KubeCon
I may be mistaken, but iiuc the Knative team spent time in q2 working with many of the serverless oss projects, so that they used Knative CRDs. That could explain the appearance of proliferation in
I may be mistaken, but iiuc the Knative team spent time in q2 working with many of the serverless oss projects, so that they used Knative CRDs. That could explain the appearance of proliferation in
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#2554
·
|
|
Re: Thoughts on KubeCon
Camille, that is a fantastic observation. Thanks for pointing it out.
--
Matt Farina
mattfarina.com
Camille, that is a fantastic observation. Thanks for pointing it out.
--
Matt Farina
mattfarina.com
|
By
Matt Farina
·
#2553
·
|
|
Re: Thoughts on KubeCon
Precisely. This is what some of us are getting at. And to reiterate not all that different than having a *whole track* for Istio in Kovnhavn while Istio was still nascent. In fact, much less mature
Precisely. This is what some of us are getting at. And to reiterate not all that different than having a *whole track* for Istio in Kovnhavn while Istio was still nascent. In fact, much less mature
|
By
Ruben Orduz <ruben@...>
·
#2552
·
|
|
Re: Thoughts on KubeCon
This is a good idea. DevOpsDays KC is a single track, so we have different concerns, but we run a series of lightening talks where we often put things that are less pertinent but still need exposure
This is a good idea. DevOpsDays KC is a single track, so we have different concerns, but we run a series of lightening talks where we often put things that are less pertinent but still need exposure
|
By
Barker, Daniel <drbarker@...>
·
#2551
·
|
|
Re: Thoughts on KubeCon
maybe a bit off-topic idea but I would like to share it for the next CloudNativeCon:
I see the need of developers and vendors to showcase the projects they are working on, despite the motivations like
maybe a bit off-topic idea but I would like to share it for the next CloudNativeCon:
I see the need of developers and vendors to showcase the projects they are working on, despite the motivations like
|
By
Eduardo Silva
·
#2550
·
|
|
Re: Thoughts on KubeCon
I’m an organizer in KC, and we do many things to get better submissions. We still have a lot of areas where we can improve, though. We reach out to other local meetups and communities and promote
I’m an organizer in KC, and we do many things to get better submissions. We still have a lot of areas where we can improve, though. We reach out to other local meetups and communities and promote
|
By
Barker, Daniel <drbarker@...>
·
#2549
·
|
|
Re: Thoughts on KubeCon
I realize I'm chiming in late here but something has been bothering me about this for a while: it is very strange that most of the submissions for this track were for a technology that was announced
I realize I'm chiming in late here but something has been bothering me about this for a while: it is very strange that most of the submissions for this track were for a technology that was announced
|
By
Camille Fournier
·
#2548
·
|
|
Re: Thoughts on KubeCon
This is interesting data. I found the track selection a bit confusing actually. I submitted a session about my experience as an end-user involved in the CloudEvents WG trying to help drive out some of
This is interesting data. I found the track selection a bit confusing actually. I submitted a session about my experience as an end-user involved in the CloudEvents WG trying to help drive out some of
|
By
Barker, Daniel <drbarker@...>
·
#2547
·
|
|
Re: Thoughts on KubeCon
DevOps Enterprise Summit asks about a lot of transformation related details. We may want to do that as well since many of the end-users are likely using these tools to help move their legacy
DevOps Enterprise Summit asks about a lot of transformation related details. We may want to do that as well since many of the end-users are likely using these tools to help move their legacy
|
By
Barker, Daniel <drbarker@...>
·
#2546
·
|
|
Re: Thoughts on KubeCon
As an end-user, I submitted several this year that weren’t accepted, and I don’t have a team of people to make it sound great, and I don’t speak at a lot of conferences in order to know exactly
As an end-user, I submitted several this year that weren’t accepted, and I don’t have a team of people to make it sound great, and I don’t speak at a lot of conferences in order to know exactly
|
By
Barker, Daniel <drbarker@...>
·
#2545
·
|
|
Re: Thoughts on KubeCon
Thanks, Mike. We were looking for a model we could emulate and DevopsDays looks like a promising one. CNCF staff are investigating this.
--
Dan Kohn <dan@...>
Executive Director, Cloud Native
Thanks, Mike. We were looking for a model we could emulate and DevopsDays looks like a promising one. CNCF staff are investigating this.
--
Dan Kohn <dan@...>
Executive Director, Cloud Native
|
By
Dan Kohn <dan@...>
·
#2544
·
|
|
Re: Thoughts on KubeCon
Hi,
I wonder if we might want to look at a similar setup as devopsdays?
It is organized by local groups, and the rules are quite simple and fair. It must be organized by a committee from various
Hi,
I wonder if we might want to look at a similar setup as devopsdays?
It is organized by local groups, and the rules are quite simple and fair. It must be organized by a committee from various
|
By
mike@...
·
#2543
·
|
|
Re: Thoughts on KubeCon
Hello,
Sounds like a lot of value packed within a single day!
By any chance, how can we plan for something similar to be held in Tokyo?
There are container focused events held here, and some are
Hello,
Sounds like a lot of value packed within a single day!
By any chance, how can we plan for something similar to be held in Tokyo?
There are container focused events held here, and some are
|
By
Ippei Suzuki
·
#2542
·
|
|
Re: Thoughts on KubeCon
We had a Kubernetes day in Amsterdam last June which was a good success; we had 200 attendees for a full day, single track event hosted in a great location (thanks to the ones in cc to make it
We had a Kubernetes day in Amsterdam last June which was a good success; we had 200 attendees for a full day, single track event hosted in a great location (thanks to the ones in cc to make it
|
By
alessandro
·
#2541
·
|
|
Re: Thoughts on KubeCon
Also an option, of course.
By the way, we do have a local event - Cloud Native London, it took place
last month and also in 2017 (IIRC). It's a great event, but it's not exactly
affordable.
Also an option, of course.
By the way, we do have a local event - Cloud Native London, it took place
last month and also in 2017 (IIRC). It's a great event, but it's not exactly
affordable.
|
By
Ilya Dmitrichenko
·
#2540
·
|
|
Re: Thoughts on KubeCon
One more option to would be to partner with existing community events
and add k8s or CloudNative tracks. We've found this to be a win/win
at SCALE and other local events I'm involved in.
One more option to would be to partner with existing community events
and add k8s or CloudNative tracks. We've found this to be a win/win
at SCALE and other local events I'm involved in.
|
By
Ilan Rabinovitch
·
#2539
·
|
|
Re: Thoughts on KubeCon
Yes ;)
Cheers,
Michael
--
Michael Hausenblas, Developer Advocate
OpenShift by Red Hat
Mobile: +353 86 0215164 | Twitter: @mhausenblas
http://openshift.com | http://mhausenblas.info
Yes ;)
Cheers,
Michael
--
Michael Hausenblas, Developer Advocate
OpenShift by Red Hat
Mobile: +353 86 0215164 | Twitter: @mhausenblas
http://openshift.com | http://mhausenblas.info
|
By
Michael Hausenblas <mhausenb@...>
·
#2538
·
|
|
Re: Thoughts on KubeCon
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 10:46 AM Michael Hausenblas <mhausenb@...> wrote
To be clear, are you suggesting that we could leverage
existing groups by considering to mini-conferences at
the locations
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 10:46 AM Michael Hausenblas <mhausenb@...> wrote
To be clear, are you suggesting that we could leverage
existing groups by considering to mini-conferences at
the locations
|
By
Ilya Dmitrichenko
·
#2537
·
|