Only about 1/3 of people attended for the general session technical content? Do we know if that has changed over time? Is this typical compared to other conferences? I can’t help but wonder, am I

We might want to be careful with data about past conferences. The Cons started with many insiders. Then it was very much about cluster ops and there was regular talk about the lack of apps there. The

Thanks Matt, I will defer to Alexis as TOC Chair if he wants to make this an agenda item or not at an upcoming meeting. We are happy to offer space at KubeCon Seattle to discuss this topic with staff

Has there been a survey of attendees from previous conferences? Is there data that shows attendees dissatisfaction with the content and specific areas?

I would like to request that we have a discussion in a TOC meeting on the Con technical content. I’m happy to help curate items to discuss on it. Three ideas I would initially seed the list with

I may be mistaken, but iiuc the Knative team spent time in q2 working with many of the serverless oss projects, so that they used Knative CRDs. That could explain the appearance of proliferation in

Camille, that is a fantastic observation. Thanks for pointing it out. -- Matt Farina mattfarina.com

Precisely. This is what some of us are getting at. And to reiterate not all that different than having a *whole track* for Istio in Kovnhavn while Istio was still nascent. In fact, much less mature

This is a good idea. DevOpsDays KC is a single track, so we have different concerns, but we run a series of lightening talks where we often put things that are less pertinent but still need exposure

maybe a bit off-topic idea but I would like to share it for the next CloudNativeCon: I see the need of developers and vendors to showcase the projects they are working on, despite the motivations like

I’m an organizer in KC, and we do many things to get better submissions. We still have a lot of areas where we can improve, though. We reach out to other local meetups and communities and promote

I realize I'm chiming in late here but something has been bothering me about this for a while: it is very strange that most of the submissions for this track were for a technology that was announced

This is interesting data. I found the track selection a bit confusing actually. I submitted a session about my experience as an end-user involved in the CloudEvents WG trying to help drive out some of

DevOps Enterprise Summit asks about a lot of transformation related details. We may want to do that as well since many of the end-users are likely using these tools to help move their legacy

As an end-user, I submitted several this year that weren’t accepted, and I don’t have a team of people to make it sound great, and I don’t speak at a lot of conferences in order to know exactly

Thanks, Mike. We were looking for a model we could emulate and DevopsDays looks like a promising one. CNCF staff are investigating this. -- Dan Kohn <dan@...> Executive Director, Cloud Native

Hi, I wonder if we might want to look at a similar setup as devopsdays? It is organized by local groups, and the rules are quite simple and fair. It must be organized by a committee from various

Hello, Sounds like a lot of value packed within a single day! By any chance, how can we plan for something similar to be held in Tokyo? There are container focused events held here, and some are

We had a Kubernetes day in Amsterdam last June which was a good success; we had 200 attendees for a full day, single track event hosted in a great location (thanks to the ones in cc to make it

Also an option, of course. By the way, we do have a local event - Cloud Native London, it took place last month and also in 2017 (IIRC). It's a great event, but it's not exactly affordable.