Even a max of 3-5 from one vendor would be a significant difference from the 68 from one company, 41 from another.... ---- Nick On 10/3/2018 2:54 PM, Anthony Skipper

I would agree with double blind. But a max of 1 talk per vendor might also go a long way.

On the call yesterday, Dan asked me to send out my thoughts on double-blind reviewing. My e-mail quickly turned into a blog entry:

thanks Michael, good write up. I really like the overall thinking here. We are not raising the bar for adoption, but we are asking for clarity of thought and planning for early projects. That will

To add a bit of color on the Falco Sandbox proposal and presentation. I started with the proposal document first because I felt that the problem we were trying to solve may not necessarily be well

Camille, If we are looking for prior art to build templates on, the ASF incubator has a template [1], examples of proposals are at [2][3]. I like the sections in there on why the project wants to

I agree requiring the writing up front (instead of after the presentation) can be useful, here are some good examples imho: Falco

Chris pointed out in chat that groups already are writing up docs for their proposals. However, the problem in my mind is that first we see a slide deck style presentation, then it is followed by a

I’ll be boarding a plane at 8AM, so I probably won’t be on the call today. Q Quinton Hoole Technical Vice President America Research Center 2330 Central Expressway, Santa Clara, CA

I won't have time to listen in on the call, but I like what I am seeing. Thanks Alexis and everyone else.

I have updated the Agenda

Hi all Apologies, there will be an updated Agenda tomorrow. Want to discuss some TOC business. Will be asking project presentations to go on hold Alexis

Here's the agenda deck for tomorrow: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Xt1xNSN8_pGuDLl5H8xEYToFss7VoIm7GBG0e_HrsLc/edit?ts=5bae170b#slide=id.g25ca91f87f_0_0 We will be hearing from the keycloak

+1 (non-binding)

The vote for Rook moving to the incubation maturity level has been approved: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/139 https://www.cncf.io/blog/2018/09/25/toc-votes-to-move-rook/ +1 binding TOC votes

+1 (non-binding)

+1 (non-binding) -- Aviv Laufer| DoiT International| phone: +972-54-5365536| email: aviv@...Follow me:

+1 (non-binding)

would like to remind TOC member to vote on WG proposition :)-- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Standard Engineer IT Standard & Patent/IT Product Line Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd Email:

+1 non-binding -- Aparna Sinha Group Product Manager Kubernetes 650-283-6086 (m)