Bounties on bug fixes comes to mind. -- Jessie Frazelle 4096R / D4C4 DD60 0D66 F65A 8EFC 511E 18F3 685C 0022 BFF3 pgp.mit.edu

Pay the maintainers and high contributors who don't have other means to make money. -- Jessie Frazelle 4096R / D4C4 DD60 0D66 F65A 8EFC 511E 18F3 685C 0022 BFF3 pgp.mit.edu

Matt I kicked off a new thread on the "helping projects" topic you & Jessie have homed in on. Re: "favourites" I think this ought to be simple: 1) Graduated & Incubated projects get lots of help &

If you have ideas on how we can help projects more, please give us ideas here or take a look at the servicedesk where we document the services CNCF offers for projects:

Jessie & Matt Thank-you for raising and elaborating on the topic of how CNCF helps projects. The topic was aired (again) at the last GB offsite, whose slides were shared a couple of months ago.

Hey all, one of the feedback items from the last CNCF Maintainer Survey was improved documentation for the service desk used by CNCF projects: https://github.com/cncf/servicedesk We have recently

Beyond neutral IP, I agree this is the most important thing the foundation provides, and IMHO CNCF does not do enough of it (there are so many things that high velocity projects need I could go on and

Yeah that was what I meant with shared IP. I think there are ways to limit the effect of gamification of the system and I think you all have done a great job of this so far especially with the format

In addition to what Jess said, a foundation provides a vendor neutral (or as close as we can get) location for a project. Competitors on products and services have a place to work together on projects

+1 Agreed and well put. From:<cncf-toc@...> on behalf of "Jessica Frazelle via Lists.Cncf.Io" <me=jessfraz.com@...> Reply-To: "me@..." <me@...> Date: Tuesday, September 18, 2018 at 5:31 PM To:

Really excited to see this news. It's a trend to embrace the CNCF ecosystem (k8s, docker) currently, and we are trying to build our own platform based on k8s. In image distribution part, Dragonly is

Matt I agree! These are both good areas for a Category WG to be responsible for. One Q -- I wasn't sure what you meant by "Then, separate from the documentation effort, come up with a list of value

The foundation exists to foster cloud native technology and adoption by end users The basis for this is that certain open source projects solve problems specific to cloud native, as defined by the

I agree with Jessie -- and for whatever it's worth, here were my reasons to be involved with the CNCF during its inception over three years ago:

I agree with Jessie!

In my opinion the foundations role should be a space for shared IP. And I agreed that people are putting too much importance on being in the foundation. You can do open source without a foundation.

First off, please take this in the sprit in which it's intended. It's not meant to be snarky or argumentative, (though it will probably sound that way), it's just meant to start a conversation. I've

I really liked the honesty around politics, companies (both big and startup), and the ways extending the community can be gamed. It’s great to see reflection on keeping things on track. I had a few

Here's the agenda deck for tomorrow: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1gNU8wJK2NH902V_j_Dbaz12ptIgWEMYCM8MVeVfqFIM/edit#slide=id.g25ca91f87f_0_0 We will be covering a backlog of community

wow, times change. +1