|
Re: [VOTE] Rook moving to incubation
+1 non-binding
By
Yassine Tijani <ytijani@...>
·
#2372
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Rook moving to incubation
+1 binding
By
Ken Owens
·
#2371
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Rook moving to incubation
+1 non-binding
--
Bob Killen
Research Cloud Administrator
University of Michigan
+1 non-binding
--
Bob Killen
Research Cloud Administrator
University of Michigan
|
By
Bob Killen <rkillen@...>
·
#2370
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Rook moving to incubation
+1 (non-binding)
--
Thomas Phelan
Chief Architect
650 533 6462Try BlueData on AWS: www.bluedata.com/AWS
+1 (non-binding)
--
Thomas Phelan
Chief Architect
650 533 6462Try BlueData on AWS: www.bluedata.com/AWS
|
By
Tom Phelan
·
#2369
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Rook moving to incubation
+1 binding
By
alexis richardson
·
#2368
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Rook moving to incubation
+1 (non binding)
By
Steve Kokhang Leon
·
#2367
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Rook moving to incubation
+1 (non-binding)
By
Alex Chircop
·
#2366
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Rook moving to incubation
Very big (non-binding) +1 !
Very big (non-binding) +1 !
|
By
Joseph Jacks <j@...>
·
#2365
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Rook moving to incubation
+1 (non-binding).
By
Ihor Dvoretskyi
·
#2364
·
|
|
[VOTE] Rook moving to incubation
Rook (https://rook.io) has requested to move to the incubation maturity level:
https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/139
In the time since being accepted to the sandbox, two releases were completed,
Rook (https://rook.io) has requested to move to the incubation maturity level:
https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/139
In the time since being accepted to the sandbox, two releases were completed,
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#2363
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SAFE (Security) Working Group
+1 (non-binding)
By
Ylinen, Mikko
·
#2362
·
|
|
Re: RFC: Dragonfly
Hi, Randy,
Thanks for your feedback.
We are very sure that all these adopters of Dragonfly are using Dragonfly in production like what I mentioned in my presentation.
Since Dragonfly is very
Hi, Randy,
Thanks for your feedback.
We are very sure that all these adopters of Dragonfly are using Dragonfly in production like what I mentioned in my presentation.
Since Dragonfly is very
|
By
AllenSun
·
#2361
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SAFE (Security) Working Group
+1 (non-binding)
Yuan Chen
Principal Architect, JD Silicon Valley R&D Center
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>
Date: Tuesday, September 4, 2018 at 6:50 AM
To:
+1 (non-binding)
Yuan Chen
Principal Architect, JD Silicon Valley R&D Center
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>
Date: Tuesday, September 4, 2018 at 6:50 AM
To:
|
By
Yuan Chen <yuan.chen@...>
·
#2360
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SAFE (Security) Working Group
+1 (non-binding)
Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> schrieb am Di. 4. Sep. 2018 um 15:50:
--
Beste Arbeitgeber ITK 2018 - 1.Platz für QAware
ausgezeichnet von Great Place to Work und kununu
Dr.
+1 (non-binding)
Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> schrieb am Di. 4. Sep. 2018 um 15:50:
--
Beste Arbeitgeber ITK 2018 - 1.Platz für QAware
ausgezeichnet von Great Place to Work und kununu
Dr.
|
By
Josef Adersberger
·
#2359
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SAFE (Security) Working Group
+1 (non-binding)
Carlos Arturo Quiroga Quiroga.
"Daniel Bryant" ---09/05/2018 03:34:24 AM---+1 (non-binding) On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 2:50 PM Chris Aniszczyk <
From: "Daniel Bryant"
+1 (non-binding)
Carlos Arturo Quiroga Quiroga.
"Daniel Bryant" ---09/05/2018 03:34:24 AM---+1 (non-binding) On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 2:50 PM Chris Aniszczyk <
From: "Daniel Bryant"
|
By
Carlos Arturo Quiroga <cquiroga@...>
·
#2358
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SAFE (Security) Working Group
+1 (non-binding)
---------------------------------------
王鹏飞
Technical VP
北京焱融科技有限公司
手机:+86-13681265240
邮箱:wangpengfei@...
URL: www.yanrongyun.com
+1 (non-binding)
---------------------------------------
王鹏飞
Technical VP
北京焱融科技有限公司
手机:+86-13681265240
邮箱:wangpengfei@...
URL: www.yanrongyun.com
|
By
wangpengfei@yanrongyun.com
·
#2357
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SAFE (Security) Working Group
+1 non-binding
By
Evan Gilman
·
#2356
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SAFE (Security) Working Group
+1 (non binding)
By
Yong Tang
·
#2355
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SAFE (Security) Working Group
+1 (non-binding)
By
Daniel Bryant
·
#2354
·
|
|
Re: RFC: Dragonfly
Hi, Deepak Vij,
Thanks for your feedback.
Yes, it's a great job to support image pulling optimization in scheduling of Kubernetes.
I think that the important feature you mentioned is
focus on
Hi, Deepak Vij,
Thanks for your feedback.
Yes, it's a great job to support image pulling optimization in scheduling of Kubernetes.
I think that the important feature you mentioned is
focus on
|
By
AllenSun
·
#2353
·
|