|
Re: [VOTE] SAFE (Security) Working Group
+1 non-binding
By
ytijani@...
·
#2320
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SAFE (Security) Working Group
+1 (non-binding)
--
Thomas Phelan
Chief Architect
650 533 6462Try BlueData on AWS: www.bluedata.com/AWS
+1 (non-binding)
--
Thomas Phelan
Chief Architect
650 533 6462Try BlueData on AWS: www.bluedata.com/AWS
|
By
Tom Phelan
·
#2319
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SAFE (Security) Working Group
+1 binding
By
Ken Owens
·
#2318
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SAFE (Security) Working Group
+1 (non-binding)
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>
Date: Tuesday, September 4, 2018 at 9:50 AM
To: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] SAFE
+1 (non-binding)
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>
Date: Tuesday, September 4, 2018 at 9:50 AM
To: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] SAFE
|
By
Geri Jennings
·
#2317
·
|
|
[VOTE] SAFE (Security) Working Group
A new CNCF Working Group has been proposed (sponsored by Ken Owens):
https://github.com/cn-security/safe
Secure Access for Everyone (SAFE) Working Group will explore secure access, policy control and
A new CNCF Working Group has been proposed (sponsored by Ken Owens):
https://github.com/cn-security/safe
Secure Access for Everyone (SAFE) Working Group will explore secure access, policy control and
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#2316
·
|
|
Re: RSocket Followup (post TOC meeting)
> why did you feel it necessary to add an additional layer of application flow control on top of what TCP already provides?
This is discussed in the FAQ of the project:
> why did you feel it necessary to add an additional layer of application flow control on top of what TCP already provides?
This is discussed in the FAQ of the project:
|
By
Ben Christensen
·
#2315
·
|
|
Re: RSocket Followup (post TOC meeting)
> Other than to support non-TCP transports (like UDP), which I would assume are fairly uncommon,
This is actually something we leverage in production:
- TCP for server-to-server
- WebSocket for
> Other than to support non-TCP transports (like UDP), which I would assume are fairly uncommon,
This is actually something we leverage in production:
- TCP for server-to-server
- WebSocket for
|
By
Ben Christensen
·
#2314
·
|
|
Re: RSocket Followup (post TOC meeting)
> How much interoperability testing have you done?
We use rsocket-cpp, rsocket-js, and rsocket-java together. C++ as both client and server. JS as a client against C++ and Java, and recently
> How much interoperability testing have you done?
We use rsocket-cpp, rsocket-js, and rsocket-java together. C++ as both client and server. JS as a client against C++ and Java, and recently
|
By
Ben Christensen
·
#2313
·
|
|
Re: TOC + Community Input: Cloud Native Buildpacks
Thanks Alexis, I let the folks know to put together an official proposal for the sandbox:
https://github.com/cncf/toc/issues/122#issuecomment-416621975
--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
Thanks Alexis, I let the folks know to put together an official proposal for the sandbox:
https://github.com/cncf/toc/issues/122#issuecomment-416621975
--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#2312
·
|
|
Re: TOC + Community Input: Cloud Native Buildpacks
I am happy to co-sponsor.
alexis
<caniszczyk@...> wrote:
I am happy to co-sponsor.
alexis
<caniszczyk@...> wrote:
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#2311
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] etcd project proposal (incubation)
+1 (non-binding)
Cheers,
Michael
--
Michael Hausenblas, Developer Advocate
OpenShift by Red Hat
Mobile: +353 86 0215164 | Twitter: @mhausenblas
http://openshift.com | http://mhausenblas.info
+1 (non-binding)
Cheers,
Michael
--
Michael Hausenblas, Developer Advocate
OpenShift by Red Hat
Mobile: +353 86 0215164 | Twitter: @mhausenblas
http://openshift.com | http://mhausenblas.info
|
By
Michael Hausenblas <mhausenb@...>
·
#2310
·
|
|
Re: Feedback on Cortex presentation + call for TOC sponsors
Thanks Bryan!
By
Tom Wilkie <tom.wilkie@...>
·
#2309
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] etcd project proposal (incubation)
+1 Binding
By
Ken Owens
·
#2308
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] etcd project proposal (incubation)
+1 non-binding
By
Erin Boyd
·
#2307
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] etcd project proposal (incubation)
+1 non-binding
Regards,
-Tamal
+1 non-binding
Regards,
-Tamal
|
By
Tamal Saha
·
#2306
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] etcd project proposal (incubation)
+1 non-binding
Iftach Schonbaum
Senior Solution Architect
+972-52-8281751
cloudzone.io
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of 郑淮城 <huaicheng.zheng@...>
Date: Thursday, 23
+1 non-binding
Iftach Schonbaum
Senior Solution Architect
+972-52-8281751
cloudzone.io
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of 郑淮城 <huaicheng.zheng@...>
Date: Thursday, 23
|
By
iftach Schonbaum
·
#2305
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] etcd project proposal (incubation)
+1 non-binding
郑淮城
星环信息科技(上海)有限公司
15216615728
徐汇区虹漕路88号越虹广场B座11-12楼
发件人: <cncf-toc@...> 代表 Chris Aniszczyk
+1 non-binding
郑淮城
星环信息科技(上海)有限公司
15216615728
徐汇区虹漕路88号越虹广场B座11-12楼
发件人: <cncf-toc@...> 代表 Chris Aniszczyk
|
By
郑淮城 <huaicheng.zheng@...>
·
#2304
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] etcd project proposal (incubation)
+1 non-binding
By
colin@...
·
#2303
·
|
|
Re: Feedback on Cortex presentation + call for TOC sponsors
Thanks Bryan, duly noted here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/125#issuecomment-415137365
--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
Thanks Bryan, duly noted here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/125#issuecomment-415137365
--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#2302
·
|
|
Re: Feedback on Cortex presentation + call for TOC sponsors
Just to follow up on this: after speaking with the Cortex team, I'm happy to co-sponsor them as a CNCF sandbox project!
- Bryan
P.S. Thanks, too, to the team for educating me as to the
Just to follow up on this: after speaking with the Cortex team, I'm happy to co-sponsor them as a CNCF sandbox project!
- Bryan
P.S. Thanks, too, to the team for educating me as to the
|
By
Bryan Cantrill <bryan@...>
·
#2301
·
|