Maybe prefix things intead of postfix things to get the ordering right? Some tools sort () and [] after letters and numbers. Give it a shot? FWIW, the over promotion of sandbox projects was raised at

In addition, Pivotal's interest in RSocket extends beyond the Java implementation and we're specifically interested in JavaScript and Go. For us to be comfortable, we'd ensure reliable

Hi Alexis, How much interoperability testing have you done? Especially in the multi hop multi implementation cases There are internal tests using RSocket with the different implementations and

Go, java, js and c++ would be a convincing portfolio, if interop worked.

RSocket’s primary use-case is distributed systems communication. I mentioned the above example as it’s difficult to do that today and you usually need additional components like Socket.io,

I'd like to add to Ben's comments that this pattern is implemented in many message brokers which de facto support relays a->b->c. The appeal (to me) of rsocket is to make the pattern part of the

TCP flow control is at the byte level and RSocket is flow control at the message level. It's often easier to reason at the message level when you build applications because you don't have to guess

Is mobile the primary use case today? Rsocket uses client-slide load balancing to achieve this? https://github.com/rsocket/rsocket-java/tree/1.0.x/rsocket-load-balancer OOC, how much work does

FYI this is the best we can do, based on the day the data is pulled within the CFP program (it's why Helm is at the bottom instead of alphabetized currently) If we reorder them, then, for example,

and of course I posted the wrong screenshot sigh: -- Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719

At the moment, we are limited to what the CFP tool is capable of doing, so we only have a list. We have updated the list of projects to label their relative maturity level in the CFP system. For

Yes I agree with Quinton

OK, I’m suggesting the opposite – three clearly separate lists – graduated, incubating, sandbox If I’m the only one who feel strongly on this I’m happy to step down off my soapbox. But I

We can annotate each listing with the project maturity level, that's my proposed solution moving forward. -- Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719

This topic has already come up several times in the ToC. We explicitly decided that a very clear distinction should always be drawn between sandbox, incubation and graduated projects in

I don't see an issue with listing the projects in alphabetic order outside that it should be a series of checkboxes instead of radio buttons (we will fix that soon). The TOC list is meant for

Correct.

+1 congratulations and good work

Adding Tim Bozarth from Netflix, who's had some practical experience working with both gRPC and RSocket. Full thread here: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/topic/rsocket_followup_post_toc/24221841 +1

This is a question more for CNCF staff based on the marketing expectations of sandbox projects: https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/process/sandbox.md#clarifying-marketing-expectations I'm