cncf-toc@lists.cncf.io

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Messages

Between

and

We can annotate each listing with the project maturity level, that's my proposed solution moving forward. -- Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719

By Chris Aniszczyk · #2215 ·

Re: Question on sandbox projects

This topic has already come up several times in the ToC. We explicitly decided that a very clear distinction should always be drawn between sandbox, incubation and graduated projects in

By Quinton Hoole · #2214 ·

Re: Question on sandbox projects

I don't see an issue with listing the projects in alphabetic order outside that it should be a series of checkboxes instead of radio buttons (we will fix that soon). The TOC list is meant for

By Chris Aniszczyk · #2213 ·

Re: Question on sandbox projects

Correct.

By Luis Pab?n · #2212 ·

Re: [RESULT] Prometheus moving to graduation (PASSED)

+1 congratulations and good work

By alexis richardson · #2211 ·

Re: RSocket Followup (post TOC meeting)

Adding Tim Bozarth from Netflix, who's had some practical experience working with both gRPC and RSocket. Full thread here: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/topic/rsocket_followup_post_toc/24221841 +1

By hsaliak@... · #2210 ·

Re: Question on sandbox projects

This is a question more for CNCF staff based on the marketing expectations of sandbox projects: https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/process/sandbox.md#clarifying-marketing-expectations I'm

By Chris Aniszczyk · #2209 ·

Question on sandbox projects

Hi all, While creating a CFP for Kubecon/Seattle I noticed that sandbox projects get first level choices in the Kubecon CFP. Does this apply to any sandbox project? Will the CNCF continue with this

By Luis Pab?n · #2208 ·

Re: [RESULT] Prometheus moving to graduation (PASSED)

Great news! Congratulations.

By Ihor Dvoretskyi · #2207 ·

Re: [RESULT] Prometheus moving to graduation (PASSED)

Congrats Prometheans! Very well deserved. Q Quinton Hoole Technical Vice President America Research Center 2330 Central Expressway, Santa Clara, CA 95050 Tel: 408-330-4721 Cell: 408-320-8917

By Quinton Hoole · #2206 ·

[RESULT] Prometheus moving to graduation (PASSED)

The vote for Prometheus to graduate has been approved: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/88 https://www.cncf.io/announcement/2018/08/09/prometheus-graduates/ +1 binding TOC votes (9/9): Alexis:

By Chris Aniszczyk · #2205 ·

Re: [VOTE] Prometheus moving to graduation

+1 (binding) -- Benjamin Hindman Founder of Mesosphere and Co-Creator of Apache Mesos Mesosphere Inc. Follow us on Twitter: @mesosphere Follow Us

By Benjamin Hindman · #2204 ·

Re: RSocket Followup (post TOC meeting)

Yes, that’s right. I’m not sure where the notion that Go doesn’t do async well came from. In my experience golang does just fine using channels and go routines. Here’s a fairly useful

By Quinton Hoole · #2203 ·

Re: RSocket Followup (post TOC meeting)

Hi Justin, From the go people I talked with we can use go channels for request stream and request channel. For request / response and fire forget people could be a use a go routine. I am not a go

By Robert Roeser <robert@...> · #2202 ·

Re: RSocket Followup (post TOC meeting)

Reading through the responses, imo this speaks to a need for a public project feature comparison I mentioned elsewhere in this thread (https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/2192).

By colin@... · #2201 ·

Re: RSocket Followup (post TOC meeting)

The Go question came up in the call, which is interesting as much of the CNCF ecosystem is currently Go based, although diversifying. Go is unusual in not supporting async interfaces really,

By Justin Cormack · #2200 ·

Re: RSocket Followup (post TOC meeting)

How much interoperability testing have you done? Especially in the multi hop multi implementation cases

By alexis richardson · #2199 ·

Re: RSocket Followup (post TOC meeting)

+stevegury@... Hi, Here’s answers to your questions below. Please reach out to Ben Hale, Steve Gury, or myself if you have additional questions Thanks, Robert Roeser Rsocket team,

By Robert Roeser <robert@...> · #2198 ·

Re: RFC: etcd project proposal (incubation)

The proposal looks good. I’m fully in support. Q Quinton Hoole Technical Vice President America Research Center 2330 Central Expressway, Santa Clara, CA 95050 Tel: 408-330-4721 Cell:

By Quinton Hoole · #2197 ·

RFC: etcd project proposal (incubation)

Just a heads up, the etcd community published their incubation project proposal: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/143 I'd like to invite the TOC and wider community to review it for a week or so

By Chris Aniszczyk · #2196 ·

5781 - 5800 of 7995

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms