cncf-toc@lists.cncf.io

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Messages

Topics Expanded Polls

Export Group Data

Between

and

Re: [RESULT] Prometheus moving to graduation (PASSED)

Great news! Congratulations.

By Ihor Dvoretskyi · #2207 ·

Re: [RESULT] Prometheus moving to graduation (PASSED)

Congrats Prometheans! Very well deserved. Q Quinton Hoole Technical Vice President America Research Center 2330 Central Expressway, Santa Clara, CA 95050 Tel: 408-330-4721 Cell: 408-320-8917

By Quinton Hoole · #2206 ·

[RESULT] Prometheus moving to graduation (PASSED)

The vote for Prometheus to graduate has been approved: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/88 https://www.cncf.io/announcement/2018/08/09/prometheus-graduates/ +1 binding TOC votes (9/9): Alexis:

By Chris Aniszczyk · #2205 ·

Re: [VOTE] Prometheus moving to graduation

+1 (binding) -- Benjamin Hindman Founder of Mesosphere and Co-Creator of Apache Mesos Mesosphere Inc. Follow us on Twitter: @mesosphere Follow Us

By Benjamin Hindman · #2204 ·

Re: RSocket Followup (post TOC meeting)

Yes, that’s right. I’m not sure where the notion that Go doesn’t do async well came from. In my experience golang does just fine using channels and go routines. Here’s a fairly useful

By Quinton Hoole · #2203 ·

Re: RSocket Followup (post TOC meeting)

Hi Justin, From the go people I talked with we can use go channels for request stream and request channel. For request / response and fire forget people could be a use a go routine. I am not a go

By Robert Roeser <robert@...> · #2202 ·

Re: RSocket Followup (post TOC meeting)

Reading through the responses, imo this speaks to a need for a public project feature comparison I mentioned elsewhere in this thread (https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/2192).

By colin@... · #2201 ·

Re: RSocket Followup (post TOC meeting)

The Go question came up in the call, which is interesting as much of the CNCF ecosystem is currently Go based, although diversifying. Go is unusual in not supporting async interfaces really,

By Justin Cormack · #2200 ·

Re: RSocket Followup (post TOC meeting)

How much interoperability testing have you done? Especially in the multi hop multi implementation cases

By alexis richardson · #2199 ·

Re: RSocket Followup (post TOC meeting)

+stevegury@... Hi, Here’s answers to your questions below. Please reach out to Ben Hale, Steve Gury, or myself if you have additional questions Thanks, Robert Roeser Rsocket team,

By Robert Roeser <robert@...> · #2198 ·

Re: RFC: etcd project proposal (incubation)

The proposal looks good. I’m fully in support. Q Quinton Hoole Technical Vice President America Research Center 2330 Central Expressway, Santa Clara, CA 95050 Tel: 408-330-4721 Cell:

By Quinton Hoole · #2197 ·

RFC: etcd project proposal (incubation)

Just a heads up, the etcd community published their incubation project proposal: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/143 I'd like to invite the TOC and wider community to review it for a week or so

By Chris Aniszczyk · #2196 ·

Re: [VOTE] Prometheus moving to graduation

+1 (non-binding)

By Jesse White · #2195 ·

Re: [VOTE] Prometheus moving to graduation

+1 (non-binding) -Kai From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> Date: Tuesday, April 17, 2018 at 7:56 AM To: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...> Subject: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] Prometheus

By Kai Chen · #2194 ·

Re: RSocket Followup (post TOC meeting)

Has it not actively sought contributors or users up to now? The project hasn’t sought active contributors until now. What did the "language agnostic" point mean? RSocket is spec’d protocol

By Robert Roeser <robert@...> · #2193 ·

Re: RSocket Followup (post TOC meeting)

Great presentation, RSocket is an interesting project - the flow control handling with the lease based model is impressive. Speaking for myself and the NATS team, we’re happy to see more messaging

By colin@... · #2192 ·

Re: RSocket Followup (post TOC meeting)

Thanks for the presentation. It looks like the project has existed for about 3 years? Has it not actively sought contributors or users up to now? Development looks not very active and it has < 300

By Brian Grant · #2191 ·

Re: RSocket Followup (post TOC meeting)

Colin, your feedback is essential, please do share Rsocket team, key questions for me are: - what are main differences/USPs Vs prior art (nats, grpc, 0mq) - is rsocket more of a lib or a "product' -

By alexis richardson · #2190 ·

RSocket Followup (post TOC meeting)

https://github.com/rsocket I just wanted to move this discussion to the mailing list as there was some questions that weren't answered and I know that Colin had some feedback on the project

By Chris Aniszczyk · #2189 ·

Re: [VOTE] Prometheus moving to graduation

+1 binding

By Brian Grant · #2188 ·

5801 - 5820 of 8007

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms