|
Re: [VOTE] Prometheus moving to graduation
+1 non-binding
By
Nick Chase
·
#2166
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Prometheus moving to graduation
+1 non-binding
By
Erin Boyd
·
#2165
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Prometheus moving to graduation
+1 (non-binding)
Xuan Jia
Project Manager
Network & IT Technology ResearchCenter China Mobile Research Institute
32 Xuanwumen West Street, XichengDistirct, Beijing 100032, China
Mobile: (+86)
+1 (non-binding)
Xuan Jia
Project Manager
Network & IT Technology ResearchCenter China Mobile Research Institute
32 Xuanwumen West Street, XichengDistirct, Beijing 100032, China
Mobile: (+86)
|
By
Xuan Jia <jason.jiaxuan@...>
·
#2164
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Prometheus moving to graduation
+1 (non-binding)
Tim
By
Timothy Chen
·
#2163
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Prometheus moving to graduation
+1 (non-binding)
By
Justin Cappos
·
#2162
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Prometheus moving to graduation
+1 (non-binding)
By
Sun, Ning
·
#2161
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Prometheus moving to graduation
+1 non-binding
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Josef Adersberger <josef.adersberger@...>
Date: Wednesday, August 1, 2018 at 2:46 PM
To: Quinton Hoole <quinton.hoole@...>
Cc: "cncf-toc@..."
+1 non-binding
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Josef Adersberger <josef.adersberger@...>
Date: Wednesday, August 1, 2018 at 2:46 PM
To: Quinton Hoole <quinton.hoole@...>
Cc: "cncf-toc@..."
|
By
Grigoriu, Marius <marius.grigoriu@...>
·
#2160
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Prometheus moving to graduation
+1 (non-binding)
--
Beste Arbeitgeber ITK 2018 - 1.Platz für QAware
ausgezeichnet von Great Place to Work und kununu
Dr. Josef Adersberger
Technischer Geschäftsführer
QAware GmbH
Aschauer
+1 (non-binding)
--
Beste Arbeitgeber ITK 2018 - 1.Platz für QAware
ausgezeichnet von Great Place to Work und kununu
Dr. Josef Adersberger
Technischer Geschäftsführer
QAware GmbH
Aschauer
|
By
Josef Adersberger
·
#2159
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Prometheus moving to graduation
+1 binding
By
Camille Fournier
·
#2158
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Prometheus moving to graduation
+1 (binding)
By
Quinton Hoole
·
#2157
·
|
|
Seeking feedback on TiKV (and one more TOC sopnsor)
Hi all,
Thank you for giving our team a chance to present TiKV, a distributed transactional key-value database, on July 3.
Please let us know of your feedback and comments to our project
Hi all,
Thank you for giving our team a chance to present TiKV, a distributed transactional key-value database, on July 3.
Please let us know of your feedback and comments to our project
|
By
Kevin Xu
·
#2156
·
|
|
TOC Agenda for 7/17/2018
Hey all, we are meeting tomorrow, here's the agenda deck:
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/17p5QBVooGMLAtX6Mn6d3NAFhRmFHE0cH-WI_-0MbOm8/edit#slide=id.g25ca91f87f_0_0
We will be hearing from the
Hey all, we are meeting tomorrow, here's the agenda deck:
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/17p5QBVooGMLAtX6Mn6d3NAFhRmFHE0cH-WI_-0MbOm8/edit#slide=id.g25ca91f87f_0_0
We will be hearing from the
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#2155
·
|
|
Re: Cloud Native definition in Chinese
Final version (for now). Thanks everyone for your assistance.
https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/DEFINITION.md
CNCF Cloud Native Definition v1.0
Approved by TOC:
Final version (for now). Thanks everyone for your assistance.
https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/DEFINITION.md
CNCF Cloud Native Definition v1.0
Approved by TOC:
|
By
Dan Kohn <dan@...>
·
#2154
·
|
|
Re: Cloud Native definition in Chinese
Thanks for everybody’s comments! I accepted one more suggestion in the Google doc version.
I believe the current Chinese translation looks good enough. Even though people may still have some
Thanks for everybody’s comments! I accepted one more suggestion in the Google doc version.
I believe the current Chinese translation looks good enough. Even though people may still have some
|
By
"蔡俊杰 <j.cai@...>
·
#2153
·
|
|
Re: survey
Dan,
When we performed the k8s apps survey we listed the tools we were aware of at the time (incomplete but a list) and did a cut line based on some measure of popularity (often github stars for
Dan,
When we performed the k8s apps survey we listed the tools we were aware of at the time (incomplete but a list) and did a cut line based on some measure of popularity (often github stars for
|
By
Matt Farina
·
#2152
·
|
|
Re: survey
I agree that we could be clearer in some of the project/product distinctions. Next time, we'll add some additional reviewers to look at that issue.
--
Dan Kohn <dan@...>
Executive Director, Cloud
I agree that we could be clearer in some of the project/product distinctions. Next time, we'll add some additional reviewers to look at that issue.
--
Dan Kohn <dan@...>
Executive Director, Cloud
|
By
Dan Kohn <dan@...>
·
#2151
·
|
|
Re: survey
Hi Dan,
I know the CNCF only has the best intentions in mind and the survey is meant to better understand our community. However, there are some inconsistencies that should be addressed if we are
Hi Dan,
I know the CNCF only has the best intentions in mind and the survey is meant to better understand our community. However, there are some inconsistencies that should be addressed if we are
|
By
Erin Boyd
·
#2150
·
|
|
Re: survey
Agreed. If we included OpenShift I think we’d also need to include the other 59 certified Kubernetes distros and platforms, which seems infeasible/undesirable.
Q
Quinton Hoole
Technical Vice
Agreed. If we included OpenShift I think we’d also need to include the other 59 certified Kubernetes distros and platforms, which seems infeasible/undesirable.
Q
Quinton Hoole
Technical Vice
|
By
Quinton Hoole
·
#2149
·
|
|
Re: survey
https://www.cncf.io/blog/2017/12/06/cloud-native-technologies-scaling-production-applications/
The issue is that the question was treating OpenShift and Kubernetes separately, when we see OpenShift as
https://www.cncf.io/blog/2017/12/06/cloud-native-technologies-scaling-production-applications/
The issue is that the question was treating OpenShift and Kubernetes separately, when we see OpenShift as
|
By
Dan Kohn <dan@...>
·
#2148
·
|
|
Re: survey
Hi Dan,
Thanks for your quick reply.
I am a little concerned by OpenShift being completely omitted from the survey all together.
I would of course like to see it in the next survey (not sure when that
Hi Dan,
Thanks for your quick reply.
I am a little concerned by OpenShift being completely omitted from the survey all together.
I would of course like to see it in the next survey (not sure when that
|
By
Erin Boyd
·
#2147
·
|