|
Re: [VOTE] linkerd moving to incubation
+1 Binding
By
Ken Owens
·
#1946
·
|
|
Re: TOC Agenda for 4/3/2018
The stars seem to be aligning in exactly the wrong way, but I am also unavailable tomorrow morning...
- Bryan
The stars seem to be aligning in exactly the wrong way, but I am also unavailable tomorrow morning...
- Bryan
|
By
Bryan Cantrill <bryan@...>
·
#1945
·
|
|
Re: TOC Agenda for 4/3/2018
Unfortunately I am also unable to attend.--
Benjamin Hindman
Founder of Mesosphere and Co-Creator of Apache Mesos
Mesosphere Inc.
Follow us on Twitter: @mesosphere
Follow Us
Unfortunately I am also unable to attend.--
Benjamin Hindman
Founder of Mesosphere and Co-Creator of Apache Mesos
Mesosphere Inc.
Follow us on Twitter: @mesosphere
Follow Us
|
By
Benjamin Hindman
·
#1944
·
|
|
Re: TOC Agenda for 4/3/2018
No worries, safe travels, I can run the meeting in your absence.
--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
No worries, safe travels, I can run the meeting in your absence.
--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#1943
·
|
|
Re: TOC Agenda for 4/3/2018
Apologies, I shall miss tomorrow's meeting due to travel
Apologies, I shall miss tomorrow's meeting due to travel
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#1942
·
|
|
TOC Agenda for 4/3/2018
Here's the agenda for tomorrow's TOC meeting: https://goo.gl/FnpaEA
We will discuss the status of the TOC-selected spots election, working group process and we will feature an update from the CNCF CI
Here's the agenda for tomorrow's TOC meeting: https://goo.gl/FnpaEA
We will discuss the status of the TOC-selected spots election, working group process and we will feature an update from the CNCF CI
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#1941
·
|
|
Re: [RESULT] SPIFFE project proposal ACCEPTED (sandbox)
Excellent! This is a project that will help a lot of our use cases
Excellent! This is a project that will help a lot of our use cases
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#1940
·
|
|
Re: [RESULT] OPA project proposal ACCEPTED (sandbox)
Welcome!
By
alexis richardson
·
#1939
·
|
|
Re: [RESULT] OPA project proposal ACCEPTED (sandbox)
Very promising project!
Welcome to CNCF OPA community!
P@
Very promising project!
Welcome to CNCF OPA community!
P@
|
By
Patrick Chanezon <patrick.chanezon@...>
·
#1938
·
|
|
Re: [RESULT] SPIFFE project proposal ACCEPTED (sandbox)
Excellent news!
Welcome to CNCF SPIFFE community!
P@
Excellent news!
Welcome to CNCF SPIFFE community!
P@
|
By
Patrick Chanezon <patrick.chanezon@...>
·
#1937
·
|
|
Re: [RESULT] SPIFFE project proposal ACCEPTED (sandbox)
Awesome! Welcome SPIFFE community!
- Lee
Awesome! Welcome SPIFFE community!
- Lee
|
By
Lee Calcote
·
#1936
·
|
|
Re: [RESULT] OPA project proposal ACCEPTED (sandbox)
Spectacular! Much value to be found in OPA.
- Lee
Spectacular! Much value to be found in OPA.
- Lee
|
By
Lee Calcote
·
#1935
·
|
|
[RESULT] OPA project proposal ACCEPTED (sandbox)
Hey everyone, we are happy to announce that OPA project has been accepted into CNCF as a SANDBOX level project (https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/process/sandbox.md) sponsored by Brian Grant and
Hey everyone, we are happy to announce that OPA project has been accepted into CNCF as a SANDBOX level project (https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/process/sandbox.md) sponsored by Brian Grant and
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#1934
·
|
|
[RESULT] SPIFFE project proposal ACCEPTED (sandbox)
Hey everyone, we are happy to announce that SPIFFE project has been accepted into CNCF as a SANDBOX level project (https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/process/sandbox.md) sponsored by Brian Grant,
Hey everyone, we are happy to announce that SPIFFE project has been accepted into CNCF as a SANDBOX level project (https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/process/sandbox.md) sponsored by Brian Grant,
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#1933
·
|
|
Re: TOC Contributions
The place we usually ask for help is in reviewing upcoming project proposals:
https://github.com/cncf/toc/pulls
A current place we could use help is in driving an update to the reference architecture
The place we usually ask for help is in reviewing upcoming project proposals:
https://github.com/cncf/toc/pulls
A current place we could use help is in driving an update to the reference architecture
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#1932
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] linkerd moving to incubation
Yes.
Great suggestion. With the current model we aimed for the simplest, most basic structure that still captured what we thought was important (some maintainers are experts in a subsystem; some
Yes.
Great suggestion. With the current model we aimed for the simplest, most basic structure that still captured what we thought was important (some maintainers are experts in a subsystem; some
|
By
William Morgan
·
#1931
·
|
|
TOC Contributions
Hi TOC,
I just signed up to be a TOC Contributor, and am trying to understand what sort of contributions would be the most valuable to the TOC. I'd like to understand what the TOC's biggest
Hi TOC,
I just signed up to be a TOC Contributor, and am trying to understand what sort of contributions would be the most valuable to the TOC. I'd like to understand what the TOC's biggest
|
By
Dave Zolotusky
·
#1930
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] linkerd moving to incubation
I assume the maintainers govern all linkerd repositories, since other repositories do not contain MAINTAINERS.md
I assume the maintainers govern all linkerd repositories, since other repositories do not contain MAINTAINERS.md
|
By
Brian Grant
·
#1929
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] linkerd moving to incubation
Whoops, thanks for pointing that out. I count 3 PRs out of the last 18 or so that violated the governance rules about requiring a super-maintainer review, all minor. We're still adjusting to some of
Whoops, thanks for pointing that out. I count 3 PRs out of the last 18 or so that violated the governance rules about requiring a super-maintainer review, all minor. We're still adjusting to some of
|
By
William Morgan
·
#1928
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] linkerd moving to incubation
0 (non binding)
The governance seems confused and I am not sure it technically meets the criteria of number of committers.
The governance doc[1] states "All PRs must receive approval from at least one
0 (non binding)
The governance seems confused and I am not sure it technically meets the criteria of number of committers.
The governance doc[1] states "All PRs must receive approval from at least one
|
By
Justin Cormack
·
#1927
·
|