cncf-toc@lists.cncf.io

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Messages

Topics Expanded Polls

Export Group Data

Between

and

Re: [VOTE] linkerd moving to incubation

+1 non-binding

By Richard Hartmann · #1915 ·

Re: [VOTE] linkerd moving to incubation

+1 (non-binding) Linkerd is an excellent service mesh proxy!

By Nikolay Pshenichnyy · #1914 ·

Re: [VOTE] linkerd moving to incubation

+1 (non-binding)

By Daniel Bryant · #1913 ·

Re: [VOTE] linkerd moving to incubation

thank-you for the detailed summary, George!

By alexis richardson · #1912 ·

Re: [VOTE] linkerd moving to incubation

+1 (non binding) Linkerd provides a mature and production-ready implementation of a service mesh. There are several areas where its architecture has considerable benefits over currently available

By g.khomeriki@... · #1911 ·

Re: [VOTE] linkerd moving to incubation

+1 (non-binding)

By Zack Angelo <zack.angelo@...> · #1910 ·

Re: [VOTE] linkerd moving to incubation

+1 (non-binding) Linkerd is legit with a great core team and supporting community!

By Dan Richelson · #1909 ·

Re: [VOTE] linkerd moving to incubation

+1 (non-binding)

By Ruben Orduz <ruben@...> · #1908 ·

Re: [VOTE] linkerd moving to incubation

0 non-binding-- Chris Short https://chrisshort.net https://devopsish.com

By Chris Short · #1907 ·

Re: [VOTE] linkerd moving to incubation

-1 non-binding I think linkerd does a great job helping applications gain resilience from the network proxy and it has done an amazing 🙌 job and educating users and gaining production usage. I

By Justin Garrison <justinleegarrison@...> · #1906 ·

Re: [VOTE] linkerd moving to incubation

+1 non-binding

By Brandon Dimcheff <brandon@...> · #1905 ·

Re: [VOTE] linkerd moving to incubation

+1 (non binding) Also have a the same question, any plans to diversify that in the future ? I am glad to integrate linkerd with Apache RocketMQ 5.0 deeply :-) Best Regards, Von Gosling, Apache

By vongosling · #1904 ·

Re: [VOTE] linkerd moving to incubation

+1 (non-binding)

By Joseph Jacks <jacks.joe@...> · #1903 ·

Re: Kuberhealthy for CNCF Sandbox

Thanks Eric, but let's please keep this discussion to the GitHub issue you already opened: https://github.com/cncf/toc/issues/94 To enter the sandbox, you will need to present to the TOC and find at

By Chris Aniszczyk · #1902 ·

Kuberhealthy for CNCF Sandbox

Hello everyone, I gave a presentation today at the Kubernetes community meeting about Kuberhealthy: https://youtu.be/tvP_HPFteKI?t=41 Kuberhealthy is a synthetic monitoring tool for Kubernetes

By Greer, Eric · #1901 ·

Re: [VOTE] linkerd moving to incubation

Thanks! And those are just the public ones. :) Re: code percentages. This is a side-effect of where the project started, but we definitely want to diversify and I expect that it will happen naturally

By William Morgan · #1900 ·

Re: [RESULT] NATS project proposal ACCEPTED (incubation)

Awesome work team. Great stuff. Regards, Doug On Mar 15, 2018, at 10:12 AM, Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:

By NASSAUR, DOUGLAS C <dn283x@...> · #1899 ·

Re: [VOTE] linkerd moving to incubation

+1 (non-binding) Dan Barker Chief Architect National Association of Insurance Commissioners 1100 Walnut St. Suite 1500 Kansas City, MO 64106 816-783-8669

By drbarker@... · #1898 ·

Re: [VOTE] linkerd moving to incubation

+1 (non binding)

By JJ · #1897 ·

Re: [VOTE] linkerd moving to incubation

+1 (non binding) Impressive production adoption! I notice that 95%+ of code is contributed by current Buoyant employees. Any plans to diversify that in the future? To be clear, this is not a

By Quinton Hoole · #1896 ·

6081 - 6100 of 7995

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms