The vote for Kubernetes to graduate has passed: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/91 +1 binding TOC votes (9/9): - Alexis Richardson: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/1720 - Camille Fournier:

The vote for the Sandbox has passed: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/92 +1 TOC binding votes (6/9): - Camille Fournier: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/1783 - Brian Grant:

+1 (non-binding) -- Sebastien Goasguen Senior Director of Cloud Technologies, Bitnami +41 79 367 38 25 @sebgoa

+1 non-binding -- Taha Ozket Senior IT Consultant taha.ozket@... ACEDEMAND IT Consulting Services http://www.acedemand.com Maslak Eclipse A 164 Tel: +90-212

+1 binding Hats off to the maintainers, sustaining this kind of growth without compromising quality and consistency of design is much harder than it looks...

Here's the agenda deck for tomorrow: https://goo.gl/LcE3TC The formal agenda is fairly brief so there should be time for Q&A with the TOC but we will focus on an update to the TOC election due to

FWIW, I believe the inspiration for sandbox came from the Apache project, which uses the same term.

Bob, All, Thank-you all for your feedback on the Sandbox doc. Please don't send any more new names as suggestions. While all feedback is always welcome, I think the TOC settled on

It's a good callout, but I think it makes my point even stronger. From https://commons.apache.org/sandbox.html "The Sandbox is a Subversion repository for Commons committers to function as an open

No worries. My recommendation is simple: don't pull in REX-Ray as a separate CNCF project. Instead allow the CSI community to decide how to best deliver the tooling necessary to make it easier for

As long as we are playing around with names in a non-blocking way, might I add to the list "greenhouse"? In favor of this idea it is more aligned to selective nuturing things as they start to grow,

+1 to "playground" Cheers, Michael -- Michael Hausenblas, Developer Advocate OpenShift by Red Hat Mobile: +353 86 0215164 | Twitter: @mhausenblas http://openshift.com | http://mhausenblas.info

This might be overly colo[u]rful, but what about playground[ or kindergarten]? It implies no quality whatsoever, that breaking stuff is fine and with little consequence, and clearly carries

+1 to that!

Aah – to be clear I was not pointing fingers at anyone in particular :-). Just advocating for unambiguous communication, even to those who may not have English as a first language. Q From: Alexis

Yes, please! Also, you just called Chris British ;-)

I think the proposal skirts around the due diligence issue a bit too much. I think we need to be more direct and a little less British about it, perhaps :). I’ll add some specific comments in the

Quinton Thank-you. Do you think the Sandbox write-up is sufficiently clear on that point? (I think it is, but keen to get this right). Ruben, all, We are intentionally lowering the bar so I am

While I share some of the concerns about the name sandbox (and no, I don’t have any better proposals :-), when considering alternatives like “launchpad” and “runway" I think that we need to be

Garrett, Forgive me, I am not quite sure I follow. What is your recommendation for rexray in the context of your description below? A