cncf-toc@lists.cncf.io

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Messages

Topics Expanded Polls

Export Group Data

Between

and

Re: [VOTE] CNCF Sandbox proposal

+1 binding.

By Sam Lambert <samlambert@...> · #1807 ·

Re: RexRay follow up

https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1BthkP9OftIICEn1h9ML1F0TKXhaUxXILlcDpuz3Sjzg/edit#slide=id.g31eff88140_0_37 The best place to start here is to refer to the slide above. CSI by its name is an

By Kitson, Clinton <clinton.kitson@...> · #1806 ·

Re: [VOTE] CNCF Sandbox proposal

+1 (non-binding)

By Daniel Bryant · #1805 ·

Re: [VOTE] CNCF Sandbox proposal

+1 non-binding -- +31 652134960 CEO www.implicit-explicit.com Co-Founder www.softwarecircus.io Marketing Chair www.cncf.io

By Mark Coleman <mark@...> · #1804 ·

Re: RexRay follow up

I think Clint should chime in here, but I had seen RexRay as more than just a CSI implementation... as a multi platform storage orchestrator? Maybe some clarification on what that means could help,

By Gou Rao <grao@...> · #1803 ·

Re: RexRay follow up

Yes please do chime in!

By alexis richardson · #1802 ·

Re: RexRay follow up

Yes I think so. But really I am a storage idiot. Who else could we ask?

By alexis richardson · #1801 ·

Re: RexRay follow up

I’m glad to see the strong alignment between Rex-Ray and CSI. Would it make sense for Rex-Ray to be even more closely aligned with CSI, i.e. as a set of libraries and tools for people wanting to

By Bassam Tabbara · #1800 ·

Re: [VOTE] CNCF Sandbox proposal

'sandbox' has the connotation of 1) the island of broken toys and 2) incomplete, disposable, non-serious ideas or projects My 2c

By Ruben Orduz <ruben@...> · #1799 ·

Re: [VOTE] CNCF Sandbox proposal

+1 non-binding

By Yong Tang <ytang@...> · #1798 ·

Re: RexRay follow up

All - questions? (thanks Clint, this is super helpful) <clinton.kitson@...> wrote:

By alexis richardson · #1797 ·

Re: [VOTE] CNCF Sandbox proposal

+1 non-binding

By Christopher LILJENSTOLPE <cdl@...> · #1796 ·

Re: [VOTE] CNCF Sandbox proposal

thanks +1 non binding

By Justin Cormack · #1795 ·

Re: [VOTE] CNCF Sandbox proposal

+1 Binding www.dejamobile.com Arnaud Gouriou Email : arnaud.gouriou@... SECURE MOBILE SERVICES ENGINEER Office : +33 2 14 74 75 10 Technopole CITIS – 4 Avenue de

By Arnaud Gouriou <arnaud.gouriou@...> · #1794 ·

Re: [VOTE] CNCF Sandbox proposal

+1 Binding Ken Owens Vice President Digital Native Architecture Mastercard 2200 Mastercard Blvd. |O'Fallon, MO 63368 mobile +1 636-542-0923 From: Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> Date:

By Owens, Ken <Ken.Owens@...> · #1793 ·

Re: [VOTE] CNCF Sandbox proposal

+1 non-binding -- Eduardo Silva Open Source, Treasure Data http://www.treasuredata.com/opensource

By Eduardo Silva · #1792 ·

Re: [VOTE] CNCF Sandbox proposal

Also, if you do have comments/suggestions on details, please comment on the PR (and thanks to Justin Cormack, who has done so): https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/92

By Brian Grant · #1791 ·

Re: [VOTE] CNCF Sandbox proposal

+1 non-binding Have a few minor questions/comments in the PR though - non-blocking things. thanks -Doug _______________________________________________________ STSM | IBM Open Source, Cloud

By Doug Davis <dug@...> · #1790 ·

Re: [VOTE] CNCF Sandbox proposal

I have an outstanding query on the text around archiving and exit https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/92#pullrequestreview-99852558 And there is another issue open.

By Justin Cormack · #1789 ·

Re: [VOTE] CNCF Sandbox proposal

+1 binding We (both the CNCF and Kubernetes) definitely need something like this. We can iterate on the details.

By Brian Grant · #1788 ·

6201 - 6220 of 8007

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms