+1 binding

+1 Binding

+1 non-binding From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> Date: Monday, 26 February 2018 at 16:52 To: "cncf-toc@..." <cncf-toc@...> Subject: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] Kubernetes

​+1 non-binding​ -- Justin Garrison justingarrison.com

Chris I think the right way to reflect our governance values is in the Graduation criteria and Incubation criteria. Therefore the Sandbox doc could add a statement of the form "The CNCF will help

+1 non-binding

+1 Regards, -Andy From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of John Belamaric <jbelamaric@...> Date: Monday, February 26, 2018 at 8:59 AM To: "cncf-toc@..." <cncf-toc@...> Cc: "cncf-toc@..."

+1 non-binding

Thanks for your feedback here Stephen, a big tenant of CNCF has always been that projects are self governing and can bring their own governance as long as it's transparent + fair (we call this minimum

+1 non-binding

+1 non-binding

+1 non-binding

+1 non-binding

+1 (non-binding).

+1 non-binding.

+1 non-binding thanks -Doug _______________________________________________________ STSM | IBM Open Source, Cloud Architecture & Technology (919) 254-6905 | IBM 444-6905 | dug@... The more I'm

+1 binding

+1 binding

After last week's TOC call, we decided to start moving forward with graduation reviews. Kubernetes was the project that motivated the creation of the CNCF, and was its first (seed) project. It has

CoreDNS is now an incubating project at CNCF, here are the results: +1 binding TOC votes (6/9) - Alexis Richardson: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/1692 - Brian Grant: