|
making final changes to the Sandbox doc
Hi all
This is a further reminder to speak up on the list or in the Sandbox
doc, if you have concerns about the content, tone or emphasis. I'd
like to attempt any redrafting of passages early next
Hi all
This is a further reminder to speak up on the list or in the Sandbox
doc, if you have concerns about the content, tone or emphasis. I'd
like to attempt any redrafting of passages early next
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#1710
·
|
|
nomination
Hello TOC,
I am wishing to be nominated for the open seat on the TOC board. Alexis and Chris asked I reach out to the board to request one of you nominate me.
A little about me:
I currently am a
Hello TOC,
I am wishing to be nominated for the open seat on the TOC board. Alexis and Chris asked I reach out to the board to request one of you nominate me.
A little about me:
I currently am a
|
By
Erin Boyd
·
#1709
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CoreDNS moving to incubation
+1 Binding
By
Ken Owens
·
#1708
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CoreDNS moving to incubation
+1 non-binding
By
Thangavelu, Kapil
·
#1707
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CoreDNS moving to incubation
+1 binding
--
Benjamin Hindman
Founder of Mesosphere and Co-Creator of Apache Mesos
Mesosphere Inc.
Follow us on Twitter: @mesosphere
Follow Us
+1 binding
--
Benjamin Hindman
Founder of Mesosphere and Co-Creator of Apache Mesos
Mesosphere Inc.
Follow us on Twitter: @mesosphere
Follow Us
|
By
Benjamin Hindman
·
#1706
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CoreDNS moving to incubation
+1 non binding
By
Gou Rao <grao@...>
·
#1705
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CoreDNS moving to incubation
+1 (non-binding)
By
Bassam Tabbara <bassam@...>
·
#1704
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CoreDNS moving to incubation
+1 binding
It's also worth noting that CoreDNS announced its 1.0 release last year.
https://github.com/coredns/coredns/releases/tag/v1.0.5
+1 binding
It's also worth noting that CoreDNS announced its 1.0 release last year.
https://github.com/coredns/coredns/releases/tag/v1.0.5
|
By
Brian Grant
·
#1703
·
|
|
Re: RexRay follow up
Correct Brian, REX-Ray should be transparent to end users in this space and provides an important service by helping connect apps to storage. Operators of clusters are the ones that should be very
Correct Brian, REX-Ray should be transparent to end users in this space and provides an important service by helping connect apps to storage. Operators of clusters are the ones that should be very
|
By
Kitson, Clinton <clinton.kitson@...>
·
#1702
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CoreDNS moving to incubation
+1 (non-binding).
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Justin Garrison <justinleegarrison@...>
Date: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 at 09:26
To: "cncf-toc@..." <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: Re: [cncf-toc] [VOTE]
+1 (non-binding).
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Justin Garrison <justinleegarrison@...>
Date: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 at 09:26
To: "cncf-toc@..." <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: Re: [cncf-toc] [VOTE]
|
By
Quinton Hoole
·
#1701
·
|
|
Election Schedule for 2 TOC-selected Seats
On today's TOC call, we discussed that we have two TOC-selected seats opening up for the TOC (https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/process/election-schedule.md), the schedule is below:
2/20/2018:
On today's TOC call, we discussed that we have two TOC-selected seats opening up for the TOC (https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/process/election-schedule.md), the schedule is below:
2/20/2018:
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#1700
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CoreDNS moving to incubation
+1 non-binding
--
Justin Garrison
justingarrison.com
+1 non-binding
--
Justin Garrison
justingarrison.com
|
By
Justin Garrison <justinleegarrison@...>
·
#1699
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CoreDNS moving to incubation
+1 non-binding
--
Mark Interrante
SVP Infrastructure Engineering | Salesforce
m: 415-638-1268 e: minterrante@... t: @interrante l: in/interrante
--
-
+1 non-binding
--
Mark Interrante
SVP Infrastructure Engineering | Salesforce
m: 415-638-1268 e: minterrante@... t: @interrante l: in/interrante
--
-
|
By
minterrante@...
·
#1698
·
|
|
RexRay follow up
Thanks to Clinton for presenting.
Slides: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1BthkP9OftIICEn1h9ML1F0TKXhaUxXILlcDpuz3Sjzg/edit#slide=id.g31fcaed9a5_0_7
A response to Alexis's question/point about
Thanks to Clinton for presenting.
Slides: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1BthkP9OftIICEn1h9ML1F0TKXhaUxXILlcDpuz3Sjzg/edit#slide=id.g31fcaed9a5_0_7
A response to Alexis's question/point about
|
By
Brian Grant
·
#1697
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CoreDNS moving to incubation
+1 non-binding
By
Ihor Dvoretskyi
·
#1696
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CoreDNS moving to incubation
+1, non-binding
By
Christopher LILJENSTOLPE <cdl@...>
·
#1695
·
|
|
Final RFC: CNCF Sandbox
At today's TOC call there was consensus on the CNCF Sandbox proposal is close to being ready for a formal vote. We will leave the document open for any community comments for a week and do a formal
At today's TOC call there was consensus on the CNCF Sandbox proposal is close to being ready for a formal vote. We will leave the document open for any community comments for a week and do a formal
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#1694
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CoreDNS moving to incubation
+1 non-binding
thanks
-Doug
_______________________________________________________
STSM | IBM Open Source, Cloud Architecture & Technology
(919) 254-6905 | IBM 444-6905 | dug@...
The more I'm
+1 non-binding
thanks
-Doug
_______________________________________________________
STSM | IBM Open Source, Cloud Architecture & Technology
(919) 254-6905 | IBM 444-6905 | dug@...
The more I'm
|
By
Doug Davis <dug@...>
·
#1693
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CoreDNS moving to incubation
+1 binding
By
alexis richardson
·
#1692
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CoreDNS moving to incubation
+1 non-binding
By
John Belamaric
·
#1691
·
|