+1 binding

+1 non-binding

+1 non-binding -- Eduardo Silva Open Source, Treasure Data http://www.treasuredata.com/opensource

+1 non-binding Sent by mobile; please excuse my brevity.

+1 non-binding

At today's TOC call, we had the CoreDNS team perform their annual inception project review and request to move to the incubation level. You can see the project statistics here:

Here's the agenda deck for the TOC meeting tomorrow: https://goo.gl/Z5ytqu The agenda is primarily focused on finalizing the CNCF Sandbox proposal. We will also hear updates from the CNCF Serverless

+1. I think the term "sandbox" is great.

Hey Chris. You can ignore my Slack message. Have you seen any contributor stackalytics for the OCI project or do you have anything similar? I see data for K8s and Helm. Thanks! Rob

As a dog owner (see my sig), I love it! Imagine all of the other easter eggs we could put in our docs. We could "make governance docs great

As a dog owner, I object to that.

Can we get the phrase "cat poop" added to the formal CNCF definition of Sandbox? That would make our governance docs much more interesting to

Hurrah

I'm sorry to have missed the call this week, but I think the term "Sandbox" is great -- in addition to its positive connotations of fun and play, it's also dirty and filled with sniffling toddlers,

Please note that as of 0945 UK time on 8 Feb 2018, voting is paused. <yangguan=google.com@...> wrote:

Hi all In this week's TOC we converged on some possible changes to the Inception tier, that can address issues that have been raised about market perception & confusion. It is most likely that

+1 (non-binding)

+1 (non-binding)

Erin Let's sort out inception/sandbox and then we'll see. For the record, I think "community support" is not an objective metric. alexis

Alexis, I guess it depends on what we plan to do with inception in terms of acceptance, dd, marketing, etc.. I absolutely think it's imperative that we have community support at incubation. The