|
Re: RexRay follow up
Correct Brian, REX-Ray should be transparent to end users in this space and provides an important service by helping connect apps to storage. Operators of clusters are the ones that should be very
Correct Brian, REX-Ray should be transparent to end users in this space and provides an important service by helping connect apps to storage. Operators of clusters are the ones that should be very
|
By
Kitson, Clinton <clinton.kitson@...>
·
#1702
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CoreDNS moving to incubation
+1 (non-binding).
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Justin Garrison <justinleegarrison@...>
Date: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 at 09:26
To: "cncf-toc@..." <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: Re: [cncf-toc] [VOTE]
+1 (non-binding).
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Justin Garrison <justinleegarrison@...>
Date: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 at 09:26
To: "cncf-toc@..." <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: Re: [cncf-toc] [VOTE]
|
By
Quinton Hoole
·
#1701
·
|
|
Election Schedule for 2 TOC-selected Seats
On today's TOC call, we discussed that we have two TOC-selected seats opening up for the TOC (https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/process/election-schedule.md), the schedule is below:
2/20/2018:
On today's TOC call, we discussed that we have two TOC-selected seats opening up for the TOC (https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/process/election-schedule.md), the schedule is below:
2/20/2018:
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#1700
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CoreDNS moving to incubation
+1 non-binding
--
Justin Garrison
justingarrison.com
+1 non-binding
--
Justin Garrison
justingarrison.com
|
By
Justin Garrison <justinleegarrison@...>
·
#1699
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CoreDNS moving to incubation
+1 non-binding
--
Mark Interrante
SVP Infrastructure Engineering | Salesforce
m: 415-638-1268 e: minterrante@... t: @interrante l: in/interrante
--
-
+1 non-binding
--
Mark Interrante
SVP Infrastructure Engineering | Salesforce
m: 415-638-1268 e: minterrante@... t: @interrante l: in/interrante
--
-
|
By
Mark Interrante
·
#1698
·
|
|
RexRay follow up
Thanks to Clinton for presenting.
Slides: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1BthkP9OftIICEn1h9ML1F0TKXhaUxXILlcDpuz3Sjzg/edit#slide=id.g31fcaed9a5_0_7
A response to Alexis's question/point about
Thanks to Clinton for presenting.
Slides: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1BthkP9OftIICEn1h9ML1F0TKXhaUxXILlcDpuz3Sjzg/edit#slide=id.g31fcaed9a5_0_7
A response to Alexis's question/point about
|
By
Brian Grant
·
#1697
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CoreDNS moving to incubation
+1 non-binding
By
Ihor Dvoretskyi
·
#1696
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CoreDNS moving to incubation
+1, non-binding
By
Christopher LILJENSTOLPE <cdl@...>
·
#1695
·
|
|
Final RFC: CNCF Sandbox
At today's TOC call there was consensus on the CNCF Sandbox proposal is close to being ready for a formal vote. We will leave the document open for any community comments for a week and do a formal
At today's TOC call there was consensus on the CNCF Sandbox proposal is close to being ready for a formal vote. We will leave the document open for any community comments for a week and do a formal
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#1694
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CoreDNS moving to incubation
+1 non-binding
thanks
-Doug
_______________________________________________________
STSM | IBM Open Source, Cloud Architecture & Technology
(919) 254-6905 | IBM 444-6905 | dug@...
The more I'm
+1 non-binding
thanks
-Doug
_______________________________________________________
STSM | IBM Open Source, Cloud Architecture & Technology
(919) 254-6905 | IBM 444-6905 | dug@...
The more I'm
|
By
Doug Davis <dug@...>
·
#1693
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CoreDNS moving to incubation
+1 binding
By
alexis richardson
·
#1692
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CoreDNS moving to incubation
+1 non-binding
By
John Belamaric
·
#1691
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CoreDNS moving to incubation
+1 non-binding
--
Eduardo Silva
Open Source, Treasure Data
http://www.treasuredata.com/opensource
+1 non-binding
--
Eduardo Silva
Open Source, Treasure Data
http://www.treasuredata.com/opensource
|
By
Eduardo Silva
·
#1690
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CoreDNS moving to incubation
+1 non-binding
Sent by mobile; please excuse my brevity.
+1 non-binding
Sent by mobile; please excuse my brevity.
|
By
Richard Hartmann
·
#1689
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CoreDNS moving to incubation
+1 non-binding
By
Lee Calcote
·
#1688
·
|
|
[VOTE] CoreDNS moving to incubation
At today's TOC call, we had the CoreDNS team perform their annual inception project review and request to move to the incubation level. You can see the project statistics here:
At today's TOC call, we had the CoreDNS team perform their annual inception project review and request to move to the incubation level. You can see the project statistics here:
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#1687
·
|
|
TOC Agenda 2/20/2018
Here's the agenda deck for the TOC meeting tomorrow: https://goo.gl/Z5ytqu
The agenda is primarily focused on finalizing the CNCF Sandbox proposal. We will also hear updates from the CNCF Serverless
Here's the agenda deck for the TOC meeting tomorrow: https://goo.gl/Z5ytqu
The agenda is primarily focused on finalizing the CNCF Sandbox proposal. We will also hear updates from the CNCF Serverless
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#1686
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] [PAUSE] INCEPTION
+1. I think the term "sandbox" is great.
+1. I think the term "sandbox" is great.
|
By
Stephen Watt
·
#1685
·
|
|
data on OCI contributors
Hey Chris.
You can ignore my Slack message.
Have you seen any contributor stackalytics for the OCI project or do you have anything similar?
I see data for K8s and Helm.
Thanks!
Rob
Hey Chris.
You can ignore my Slack message.
Have you seen any contributor stackalytics for the OCI project or do you have anything similar?
I see data for K8s and Helm.
Thanks!
Rob
|
By
Rob Lalonde
·
#1684
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] [PAUSE] INCEPTION
As a dog owner (see my sig), I love it!
Imagine all of the other easter eggs we could put in our docs.
We could "make governance docs great
As a dog owner (see my sig), I love it!
Imagine all of the other easter eggs we could put in our docs.
We could "make governance docs great
|
By
Doug Davis <dug@...>
·
#1683
·
|