|
Re: [VOTE] CoreDNS moving to incubation
+1, non-binding
By
Christopher LILJENSTOLPE <cdl@...>
·
#1695
·
|
|
Final RFC: CNCF Sandbox
At today's TOC call there was consensus on the CNCF Sandbox proposal is close to being ready for a formal vote. We will leave the document open for any community comments for a week and do a formal
At today's TOC call there was consensus on the CNCF Sandbox proposal is close to being ready for a formal vote. We will leave the document open for any community comments for a week and do a formal
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#1694
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CoreDNS moving to incubation
+1 non-binding
thanks
-Doug
_______________________________________________________
STSM | IBM Open Source, Cloud Architecture & Technology
(919) 254-6905 | IBM 444-6905 | dug@...
The more I'm
+1 non-binding
thanks
-Doug
_______________________________________________________
STSM | IBM Open Source, Cloud Architecture & Technology
(919) 254-6905 | IBM 444-6905 | dug@...
The more I'm
|
By
Doug Davis <dug@...>
·
#1693
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CoreDNS moving to incubation
+1 binding
By
alexis richardson
·
#1692
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CoreDNS moving to incubation
+1 non-binding
By
John Belamaric
·
#1691
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CoreDNS moving to incubation
+1 non-binding
--
Eduardo Silva
Open Source, Treasure Data
http://www.treasuredata.com/opensource
+1 non-binding
--
Eduardo Silva
Open Source, Treasure Data
http://www.treasuredata.com/opensource
|
By
Eduardo Silva
·
#1690
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CoreDNS moving to incubation
+1 non-binding
Sent by mobile; please excuse my brevity.
+1 non-binding
Sent by mobile; please excuse my brevity.
|
By
Richard Hartmann
·
#1689
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CoreDNS moving to incubation
+1 non-binding
By
Lee Calcote
·
#1688
·
|
|
[VOTE] CoreDNS moving to incubation
At today's TOC call, we had the CoreDNS team perform their annual inception project review and request to move to the incubation level. You can see the project statistics here:
At today's TOC call, we had the CoreDNS team perform their annual inception project review and request to move to the incubation level. You can see the project statistics here:
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#1687
·
|
|
TOC Agenda 2/20/2018
Here's the agenda deck for the TOC meeting tomorrow: https://goo.gl/Z5ytqu
The agenda is primarily focused on finalizing the CNCF Sandbox proposal. We will also hear updates from the CNCF Serverless
Here's the agenda deck for the TOC meeting tomorrow: https://goo.gl/Z5ytqu
The agenda is primarily focused on finalizing the CNCF Sandbox proposal. We will also hear updates from the CNCF Serverless
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#1686
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] [PAUSE] INCEPTION
+1. I think the term "sandbox" is great.
+1. I think the term "sandbox" is great.
|
By
Stephen Watt
·
#1685
·
|
|
data on OCI contributors
Hey Chris.
You can ignore my Slack message.
Have you seen any contributor stackalytics for the OCI project or do you have anything similar?
I see data for K8s and Helm.
Thanks!
Rob
Hey Chris.
You can ignore my Slack message.
Have you seen any contributor stackalytics for the OCI project or do you have anything similar?
I see data for K8s and Helm.
Thanks!
Rob
|
By
Rob Lalonde
·
#1684
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] [PAUSE] INCEPTION
As a dog owner (see my sig), I love it!
Imagine all of the other easter eggs we could put in our docs.
We could "make governance docs great
As a dog owner (see my sig), I love it!
Imagine all of the other easter eggs we could put in our docs.
We could "make governance docs great
|
By
Doug Davis <dug@...>
·
#1683
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] [PAUSE] INCEPTION
As a dog owner, I object to that.
As a dog owner, I object to that.
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#1682
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] [PAUSE] INCEPTION
Can we get the phrase "cat poop" added to the formal CNCF definition of Sandbox? That would make our governance docs much more interesting to
Can we get the phrase "cat poop" added to the formal CNCF definition of Sandbox? That would make our governance docs much more interesting to
|
By
Doug Davis <dug@...>
·
#1681
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] [PAUSE] INCEPTION
Hurrah
By
alexis richardson
·
#1680
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] [PAUSE] INCEPTION
I'm sorry to have missed the call this week, but I think the term "Sandbox" is great -- in addition to its positive connotations of fun and play, it's also dirty and filled with sniffling toddlers,
I'm sorry to have missed the call this week, but I think the term "Sandbox" is great -- in addition to its positive connotations of fun and play, it's also dirty and filled with sniffling toddlers,
|
By
Bryan Cantrill <bryan@...>
·
#1679
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SPIFFE project proposal (inception)
Please note that as of 0945 UK time on 8 Feb 2018, voting is paused.
<yangguan=google.com@...> wrote:
Please note that as of 0945 UK time on 8 Feb 2018, voting is paused.
<yangguan=google.com@...> wrote:
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#1678
·
|
|
[VOTE] [PAUSE] INCEPTION
Hi all
In this week's TOC we converged on some possible changes to the
Inception tier, that can address issues that have been raised about
market perception & confusion. It is most likely that
Hi all
In this week's TOC we converged on some possible changes to the
Inception tier, that can address issues that have been raised about
market perception & confusion. It is most likely that
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#1677
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SPIFFE project proposal (inception)
+1 (non-binding)
By
Yang Guan
·
#1676
·
|