|
Re: updating what it means to be "Cloud Native"
Deliberately vague. Yes, it could include the platform, such as Kubernetes.
I don't know that we're ready to draw a firm boundary yet. Cloud Native is still somewhat aspirational.
Deliberately vague. Yes, it could include the platform, such as Kubernetes.
I don't know that we're ready to draw a firm boundary yet. Cloud Native is still somewhat aspirational.
|
By
Brian Grant
·
#1635
·
|
|
Re: updating what it means to be "Cloud Native"
This is much, much better!
This is much, much better!
|
By
Drew Rapenchuk <drapenchuk@...>
·
#1634
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SPIFFE project proposal (inception)
+1 (non-binding)
By
Spike Curtis
·
#1633
·
|
|
Re: updating what it means to be "Cloud Native"
Not at all. Please do! I shared them
so they could be incorporated
I agree. Many things can claim to be "scalable" but every design decision has trade-offs. How you get to scalability
Not at all. Please do! I shared them
so they could be incorporated
I agree. Many things can claim to be "scalable" but every design decision has trade-offs. How you get to scalability
|
By
Justin Garrison <justinleegarrison@...>
·
#1632
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SPIFFE project proposal (inception)
+1 (non-binding)
By
Olivier Mallassi <olivier.mallassi@...>
·
#1631
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SPIFFE project proposal (inception)
+1
By
Ramses Martinez <ramses_martinez@...>
·
#1630
·
|
|
Re: updating what it means to be "Cloud Native"
As much as I'm a strong proponent of declarative configuration and APIs (and declarative APIs :-)), I agree that they are implementation techniques. I think we should provides examples of such
As much as I'm a strong proponent of declarative configuration and APIs (and declarative APIs :-)), I agree that they are implementation techniques. I think we should provides examples of such
|
By
Brian Grant
·
#1629
·
|
|
Re: updating what it means to be "Cloud Native"
I prefer the engineered attributes:
Operable
Observable
Elastic
Resilient
AgileOver the end goals:
Scalable
Durable
Continuous
Since I think some indication of strategy/technique is needed in order
I prefer the engineered attributes:
Operable
Observable
Elastic
Resilient
AgileOver the end goals:
Scalable
Durable
Continuous
Since I think some indication of strategy/technique is needed in order
|
By
Brian Grant
·
#1628
·
|
|
Re: updating what it means to be "Cloud Native"
Great discussion. Thanks!
Do you mind if we incorporate some/all of them?
ChrisA also pointed out that Schedule A at the bottom of the charter also needs to be similarly updated. My current thinking
Great discussion. Thanks!
Do you mind if we incorporate some/all of them?
ChrisA also pointed out that Schedule A at the bottom of the charter also needs to be similarly updated. My current thinking
|
By
Brian Grant
·
#1627
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SPIFFE project proposal (inception)
+1 non binding
By
Justin Cormack
·
#1626
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SPIFFE project proposal (inception)
+1 (non-binding)
--
Michael Fertik
michael@...
DISCLAIMER
Any private opportunity discussed in this email or its attachments is being presented to you because you have expressed an interest in such
+1 (non-binding)
--
Michael Fertik
michael@...
DISCLAIMER
Any private opportunity discussed in this email or its attachments is being presented to you because you have expressed an interest in such
|
By
Michael Fertik
·
#1625
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SPIFFE project proposal (inception)
+1 non-binding
By
Kevin Lynch
·
#1624
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SPIFFE project proposal (inception)
+1 non-binding
Andrew Randall
Tigera
+1 non-binding
Andrew Randall
Tigera
|
By
Andrew Randall
·
#1623
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SPIFFE project proposal (inception)
0 non-binding
I think the spec is very interesting and necessary but I feel like it, and associated example tooling (SPIRE), may be too early for even inception level
--
Justin
0 non-binding
I think the spec is very interesting and necessary but I feel like it, and associated example tooling (SPIRE), may be too early for even inception level
--
Justin
|
By
Justin Garrison <justinleegarrison@...>
·
#1622
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SPIFFE project proposal (inception)
+1 binding
By
Brian Grant
·
#1621
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SPIFFE project proposal (inception)
+1 (non-binding)
Alan Fraser
CREDIT SUISSE
Information Technology | Core Eng - Engineering Solutions - NY, VIAD 32
+1 (non-binding)
Alan Fraser
CREDIT SUISSE
Information Technology | Core Eng - Engineering Solutions - NY, VIAD 32
|
By
Alan <alan.fraser@...>
·
#1620
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SPIFFE project proposal (inception)
-1 binding.
I would rather see this mature for a while.
-1 binding.
I would rather see this mature for a while.
|
By
Camille Fournier
·
#1619
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SPIFFE project proposal (inception)
+1 (non-binding)
Ramkumar Kb
Lead Engineer, APAC-PB-IT Channels
+65 6212 8403 (*650 8403)
==============================================================================
Please access the
+1 (non-binding)
Ramkumar Kb
Lead Engineer, APAC-PB-IT Channels
+65 6212 8403 (*650 8403)
==============================================================================
Please access the
|
By
Kb, Ramkumar <ramkumar.kalpathy@...>
·
#1618
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SPIFFE project proposal (inception)
I’m +1 only the spec. -1 anything else.
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 17:34 Thangavelu, Kapil via Lists.Cncf.Io <kapil.thangavelu=capitalone.com@...> wrote:
--
Jessie Frazelle
4096R / D4C4 DD60 0D66 F65A
I’m +1 only the spec. -1 anything else.
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 17:34 Thangavelu, Kapil via Lists.Cncf.Io <kapil.thangavelu=capitalone.com@...> wrote:
--
Jessie Frazelle
4096R / D4C4 DD60 0D66 F65A
|
By
me@...
·
#1617
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SPIFFE project proposal (inception)
+1 (non-binding)
By
Thangavelu, Kapil
·
#1616
·
|