Brian, Thanks for your suggestion which has been put into action already! The CNI project is now the lonesome member of the "containernetworking" organization on Github [1]. We (the CNI maintainers)

+1 (non binding) Here's a link to the initial proposal: http://lists.cncf.io/pipermail/cncf-proposals/2016-April/000002.html Prometheus Proposal name of project: Prometheus description Prometheus is

YES

TOC voters, Please indicate your vote on the acceptance of Prometheus as a CNCF project by saying YES or NO. Today we are seeking unanimous support, from all TOC voting members, for the following

My appologies I have to skip this call.

Here are the slides/agenda for today's call. https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/11jk9t_oRovx0fNoRnGInVeNn3PsaOKIb5K_c704Zwhs/edit#slide=id.gd5ae4e962_2_136 TOC Call- 5/4/16 8AM PT Join the

Yes, I'm just waiting for someone to OK sharing a particular URL on the slides.

Is there an agenda for today's meeting?

Our mission is currently defined more natively than Joe's definition of "cloud native": https://cncf.io/about/our-mission The mission is described in terms of mechanisms rather than goals: containers,

For reference for the TOC list since this was sent to the marketing mailing list. Sent with Mixmax Sarah Saul Client Services Manager The

The panel was not accepted by O'Reilly. I sent an earlier email to the list Diane -- Kind Regards, Diane Mueller Director, Community Development Red Hat OpenShift @openshiftcommons We have more in

I'm not sure how my name got on there - I won't be attending the conference.

Hi Kiersten, I believe it's a full panel. Diane can confirm if anyone has dropped or if Ben could be a backup. I have the below folks listed for the panel: Chris Aniscyzk, Linux Foundation, Developer

+1

As a next step, for now, if you'd like to create a more neutral brand, I recommend moving the project to its own github org. Practically speaking, that would make the project easier to manage, also.

Hello Sarah, Please keep myself, Kim and RJ in the loop on Ben's participation at the Open Container Day. Have any further emails gone out about this? Please share. Best, Kiersten ---- Kiersten

All, There will be no TOC call this week, because quite a few people are travelling. A few asks, please: 1. Can we have a vote on Prometheus in the next few weeks? Please speak up if you'd like more

Doug I think the main worry is "ex ante and de jure standards", i.e.: - created ahead of real adoption & maturation of use cases - by a legislature with wide authority I know that Craig liked to say

On top of what Doug said, I'd like to remind the TOC on what's in the charter currently around projects (section 9): https://cncf.io/governance 9. CNCF Projects (a) It is expected that member

re: topic "A" - acceptable CNCF projects IMO the CNCF should allow a variety of types of projects. Ranging from ones that are pure "code" to ones that are just "specifications". While pure spec