cncf-toc@lists.cncf.io

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Messages

Between

and

Re: [VOTE] SPIFFE project proposal (inception)

+1 non-binding (based on proposal review, comments review and potential use in serverless context) -sebastien -- Sebastien Goasguen Senior Director of Cloud Technologies, Bitnami +41 79 367 38

By Sebastien Goasguen <sebgoa@...> · #1567 ·

Re: [VOTE] SPIFFE project proposal (inception)

+1 non-binding From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of alexis richardson <alexis@...> Reply-To: "cncf-toc@..." <cncf-toc@...> Date: Thursday, February 1, 2018 at 8:04 AM To: "cncf-toc@..."

By Grigoriu, Marius <marius.grigoriu@...> · #1566 ·

Re: [VOTE] SPIFFE project proposal (inception)

+1 non-binding 2018-02-01 16:44 GMT+01:00 Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>: -- Deutschlands beste Arbeitgeber - 1.Platz für QAware ausgezeichnet von Great Place to Work und kununu Dr. Josef

By Josef Adersberger · #1565 ·

Re: [VOTE] SPIFFE project proposal (inception)

+1 binding

By alexis richardson · #1564 ·

Re: [VOTE] SPIFFE project proposal (inception)

+1 non-binding

By Joe Beda <joe@...> · #1563 ·

[VOTE] SPIFFE project proposal (inception)

The TOC has decided to invite SPIFFE (https://github.com/spiffe) as an INCEPTION level CNCF project, sponsored by Brian Grant from the TOC. SPIFFE (Secure Production Identity Framework For Everyone)

By Chris Aniszczyk · #1562 ·

Re: updating what it means to be "Cloud Native"

I'm glad so many people found my definitions helpful! I disagree that applications have "always been designed for resiliency, operability, and observability". I have worked on numerous systems that

By Justin Garrison <justinleegarrison@...> · #1561 ·

Re: updating what it means to be "Cloud Native"

I really like how Justin framed this but I don’t want to lose the “agility” piece he mentions. Applications have always been designed for resiliency, operability, and observability and have

By Scott Hammond <scott.hammond@...> · #1560 ·

Re: updating what it means to be "Cloud Native"

I really like the "declarative, dynamic, resilient, scalable". I think it fits the need for the elevator pitch. -Bob

By Bob Wise · #1559 ·

Re: [VOTE] Vitess project proposal (incubation)

Thanks for indulging my last minute questions. +1 binding

By Camille Fournier · #1558 ·

Re: updating what it means to be "Cloud Native"

+1. -- Duncan Johnston-Watt Founder & Chair, Advisory Board Phone: +44 777 190 2653 | Skype: duncan_johnstonwatt Twitter: @duncanjw | LinkedIn: https://linkedin.com/in/duncanjohnstonwatt

By Duncan Johnston-Watt <duncan.johnstonwatt@...> · #1557 ·

Re: updating what it means to be "Cloud Native"

I’m also more aligned with Justin’s definition, the way I usually describe Cloud-Native architecture in my posts is that it provides: Durability — services must sustain component

By Yaron Haviv <yaronh@...> · #1556 ·

Re: updating what it means to be "Cloud Native"

Wow, I really like Justin's (and Kris's) definitions. As I read Brian's proposed attributes, it occurred to me how much software we have that is indisputably cloud native and yet doesn't exhibit the

By Bryan Cantrill <bryan@...> · #1555 ·

Re: updating what it means to be "Cloud Native"

This is just my opinion. Feedback is encouraged. I did a lot of thinking about definitions when writing Cloud Native Infrastructure with Kris Nova last year. In the book I define cloud native

By Justin Garrison <justinleegarrison@...> · #1554 ·

Re: updating what it means to be "Cloud Native"

Good point. I'll think about that (and am open to suggestions). "Automation" is a bit too terse, and not differentiated from the numerous automation systems of the past.

By Brian Grant · #1553 ·

Re: updating what it means to be "Cloud Native"

Although the new definition is deeper and more inclusive, I think it is much less approachable especially to an less technical audience. The "container packaged, dynamically managed, micro service

By Bob Wise · #1552 ·

Re: [VOTE] Vitess project proposal (incubation)

+1 (non-binding)

By Junghyun Kim <kjh@...> · #1551 ·

Re: [VOTE] Vitess project proposal (incubation)

+1 non-binding From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> Reply-To: "cncf-toc@..." <cncf-toc@...> Date: Thursday, January 25, 2018 at 8:50 AM To: "cncf-toc@..."

By Mark Peek · #1550 ·

Re: [VOTE] Vitess project proposal (incubation)

+1 binding

By Jonathan Boulle <jon@...> · #1549 ·

Re: updating what it means to be "Cloud Native"

Hi Brian, Thank you. This is very timely with some of the efforts that are underway with the CNCF website. We intend to have a high level messaging on several use cases and applications. Regards, Dee

By Dee Kumar <dkumar@...> · #1548 ·

6441 - 6460 of 8007

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms